100 Commits

This Branch

This Branch

All Branches

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
siddharthd	2cfaf8e8c8	statements: derive account identity, fix the new-bank alert (0033) ... account_number fragments exactly like bank_name did, from the same cause: ANZ's Access Advantage arrived as both '4085-56264' (4 statements) and '408556264' (1). uq_statement_identity keyed on it, so re-importing one period under the other spelling evaded the duplicate check. account_number_key is GENERATED ALWAYS — the number with separators stripped — and the unique index moves onto it. Derived rather than rewritten because the raw number is the readable one and some of it is structure: Up stores '633-123 / 176540052', a BSB and an account number, and flattening it would lose a distinction a human reads at a glance to fix a machine problem. The Amex mask and case are preserved; 'X' records which digits were redacted. Not the cause of the documented 31-row / $42,040.68 ANZ duplication — 107/142/143 overlap on different end dates, which that index cannot catch at any spelling. Adds statement_identity_drift: one account under two bank names, or one bank under two spellings of one number. Non-empty means fragmentation the normaliser could not know about. Currently one row, the ANZ pair above, now unified by key. Also documents the N8N regression this series caused. Check Known Bank compared the raw Gemini name against the canonical column before the insert, so nothing ever matched and every Zip statement was tagged pending and held for Slack approval — a stall, not just a noisy alert. Fixed in workflow FysADdFwEtwONQl4 by comparing like with like through normalize_bank_name(), passing currency so a genuinely new national entity still alerts. Verified live: 12s after vs 30-53s before.	2026-08-15 17:03:13 +10:00
siddharthd	c3b623052d	statements: keep one bank's national entities apart (migration 0032) ... Fixes 0031. Every merge it made was provably one account — each split pair shared an account_number — but the PREFIX generalises past that evidence. Citibank Australia and Citibank India are different banks with different accounts and currency, and `citi%` flattens them into one. Older Citi India statements are queued to load, so this would have merged them on arrival. Not Citi-specific: `hsbc%` and `%american express%` carry the identical defect. Currency alone cannot be the discriminator: Wise holds AUD, EUR and USD accounts under one provider, so a blanket "non-AUD is a different bank" rule would shatter it into three. Wise stays unmapped for exactly that reason, now a documented property rather than an accident. The country comes from the name when the name states it and from the currency otherwise, with AUD as home taking no suffix — so nothing renames: the backfill touched 0 rows. 'Citibank' + AUD -> 'Citibank' (unchanged) 'Citibank India' + INR -> 'Citibank India' 'Citibank N.A.' + INR -> 'Citibank India' (currency carries it) 'CITIBANK INDIA' + AUD -> 'Citibank India' (name beats a wrong currency) 'N.A.' is deliberately not read as a country marker: it means "National Association", a US legal form printed on Citibank letterhead worldwide, including India. Reading it as US is precisely the mistake this fixes. The trigger now fires on UPDATE OF bank_name, currency, since the country is partly derived from the currency.	2026-08-15 16:52:14 +10:00
siddharthd	0bb4329249	statements: one institution, one bank name (migration 0031) ... bank_name is a component of uq_statement_identity (bank_name, account_number, billing_end_date), so two spellings of one institution mean the same statement can be ingested twice without the index ever firing. Gemini reads the name off whatever the PDF prints, so the spelling varies per document, not per account. Zip exposed it: account 2705256 arrived under four names in sixteen minutes — ZipMoney Payments Pty Ltd, ZipMoney Payments Pty Limited, Zip Pay, ZipPay — with ten more in the ingestion queue. Not unique: 17 bank_name values represented 13 institutions, every split pair sharing an account number (Amex 14/1, Citibank/Citi 8/4, NAB 3/1). Fragmentation also splits both bank filters and by_bank in /api/analytics/fees. normalize_bank_name() + a BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger, mirroring the 0013 statement_type pattern with one deliberate difference: the vocabulary is OPEN. An unrecognised name passes through tidied rather than collapsing to a fallback, and there is no CHECK constraint — a bank never used before must be able to arrive without a migration, and destroying its name on first contact is worse than leaving it unmapped. Matching is by prefix, not by enumerated spelling, so unseen variants normalise with no code change. Branches for Westpac, ANZ, HSBC, ING, AMP, Up and CommBank are no-ops that map to the spelling already in use, to catch the legal-entity variant a future PDF might print. Wise is left alone: one spelling is a rename, not a merge. Backfill verified collision-free against uq_statement_identity first. 17 names -> 12. account_owner_mappings keys on (bank_name, account_number) with its own UNIQUE constraint and is updated too; it is empty today.	2026-08-15 16:45:04 +10:00
siddharthd	95d8544752	transactions: change who paid, on a row and on a statement ... Owner was write-once for every ingestion path — a pantry receipt hardcodes DEFAULT_OWNER_ID and there was not one `UPDATE ... SET owner_id` in src/ — so a shop the other person paid for was permanently filed as yours. PATCH /api/transactions/[id] now takes owner_id, for manual rows only. A statement row returns 400 statement_owned and points at the statements page: its effective owner is COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id), so writing it there would either no-op or detach one row from the account it came from. PATCH /api/statements/[id] is new. The statements page has had an owner dropdown since it was built, wired to a route with no PATCH handler — every change 405'd, and because useUpdateStatement never checked res.ok it failed silently and the select snapped back on refetch. It writes both tables: 2,194 statement rows carry their own owner_id against 1,803 that inherit, so updating `statements` alone moves less than half and splits one account's history between two people. The guard is the point. Access is "owner OR holds a split", so handing a row over while holding no split removes it from your list and 404s every route that could put it back — only the new owner can undo it. That is 409 would_lose_access, and the modal offers both ways forward: add my split first, or give it away anyway. Taking a row onto your own ledger is never blocked, and claiming a row you cannot see is a 404 before any owner logic runs. Splits are deliberately not rewritten. They record shares, not direction, so a 50/50 flips from "they owe me" to "I owe them" untouched, settled included. Also adds the missing res.ok check to useUpdateTransaction, without which every rejection resolved as success: the modal closed, the list refetched, and the edit silently vanished. 14 new integration tests; 203 integration + 130 unit green.	2026-08-15 16:17:38 +10:00
siddharthd	6c14b493ef	analytics: your share of what someone else paid is your spend ... Every spend analytic gated on `OWNER_SCOPE = $1` and scaled by `mySplitOf` *within* that gate, so ownership was a precondition for an expense being yours. Half a grocery shop Sonu paid for counted as zero — in monthly, daily, merchants, subscriptions, fees and the budget page. 167 rows / $3,210.91 across Jan-Jul 2026, worst in April (+$1,354.83, the Europe trips), while getParticipantBalances booked the matching debt correctly. The app could say you owed her for a shop while insisting you had not spent anything on it. New MY_SPEND_SCOPE(): owner = me OR I hold a split. OWNER_SCOPE stays on the things that measure an *account* rather than a person — the income and investment lines, and the statement-level fee rollup. myShare had to change with it, and widening the gate alone would have been worse than the bug: its `100 - everyone else` fallback is the payer's remainder, so on someone else's unsplit row it returns 100 and moves their whole bill onto you. It now branches on ownership — my row resolves as before; their row takes an explicit split row only, absent meaning 0. That 0 is what makes the wider gate safe. my_share_percent is deliberately not read on someone else's row: one unscoped column, writable by anyone who can see the row, so "my" can only mean the owner's. All 402 rows carrying one today are owner-side. MY_SHARE_PCT mirrors myShare for the transactions list, which has no viewer-scoped ts join; a test asserts the two agree across seven fixture shapes. No historical restatement — every non-owner split is 2026-dated, and the 1,266 pre-2026 SplitMyExpenses splits are all on rows you own. Also fixes a latent failure in the NATIVE_CURRENCY test, which inserted a statement relying on participant id 1 existing (owner_id is NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 with an FK) and only passed when a sibling file had left one behind. It now owns its fixture. 15 new integration tests; 189 integration + 130 unit green.	2026-08-15 15:37:32 +10:00
siddharthd	22c2349a47	docs: one CSV import path, and the statement-coverage rule that replaced the Frollo importer	2026-08-13 15:09:11 +10:00
siddharthd	3edcc27781	csv import: map a currency column, or foreign rows land as AUD ... Deleting the Frollo importer dropped its currency handling and nothing replaced it: ColumnMapping had no currency column, so applyMapping could never produce foreign_currency_code and batchInsertCSVTransactions' support for it was unreachable from the UI. The USD 10,782 salary imported as A$10,782 — about a third under, sitting in a column of AUD figures looking entirely normal, which is the same defect the owner spotted in the first place. An optional Currency column now sets foreign_currency_code and foreign_currency_amount when the cell is a three-letter code other than AUD, and leaves amount_aud NULL rather than inventing a rate. That is the shape order ingestion already uses and what AMOUNT_UNCONVERTED looks for, so the row renders as its native figure with "no AUD rate" and the statement supplies the real number when it arrives. Caught by reading the imported row rather than the import summary: the summary said 171 inserted and was right about everything it reported.	2026-08-13 15:08:50 +10:00
siddharthd	461c021e7a	csv import: exclude what the statements already cover, and delete the Frollo importer ... "This is becoming too complex... Frollo should be done through that [the manual CSV import]" (owner). It was right: a bespoke importer, an API route, a CLI, two scheduled n8n workflows and a shared secret existed to do what the CSV import modal already did, minus one rule. That rule is statement coverage, and it turns out to be the whole thing. Applying each account's newest billing_end_date as a watermark takes the real 2,607-row Frollo export down to 171 rows — with no account allowlist, no credit-card exclusion and no Frollo-specific scoping at all. Cards drop out on their own because their statements are current; the 46 card rows that survive are genuinely post-statement. Every bit of the bespoke apparatus was doing by hand what one query does generically. Deleted: src/lib/frollo-csv.ts, src/lib/frollo-ingest.ts, scripts/import-frollo.mts, src/app/api/frollo/, both test files, the FROLLO_INGEST_TOKEN wiring, and the n8n Frollo Import + Frollo Freshness Check workflows. Added to the shared CSV path, so every import benefits: - getStatementCoverage() + /api/import/statement-coverage. The review step leaves out rows an account's statements already cover and says how many, with the rows one click away. Only applies when an account column is mapped and that account has statements — a row is never dropped on a guess. - Optional Account and Row ID columns in the mapper. Account drives the watermark and is stored as source_account; Row ID becomes source_ref. - An in-file duplicate warning. A CDR re-consent re-exports history under fresh ids, so source_ref cannot see it — 385 twins in one 2,563-row export doubled every salary payment, and that is not visible by eye in a review table. Two pre-existing bugs in that path, both of which this plan depends on: - The category chosen in the review step was accepted by batchInsertCSVTransactions and then left out of the INSERT column list, so it was silently discarded and the trigger wrote 'other'. Not cosmetic: an uncategorised credit is admitted by NET_SPEND_ROWS and negated by SPEND_SIGNED, so 62 imported transfers cancelled $74,338 of spend while counting as no income. - The path had no idempotency whatsoever. row_index is assigned MAX+1 on every run, which makes uq_transaction_identity structurally unable to fire, so a second import of the same file duplicated all of it. Now writes source + source_ref with ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING. awaitsStatementLine()'s removal note is kept but rewritten: it no longer points at a deleted file, and the lesson stands — the queue jump from 8 to 558 was the measurement, not the noise.	2026-08-13 12:58:06 +10:00
siddharthd	b82c4570bd	frollo: don't import what the statements already cover ... "We should not be importing from Frollo what we already have from statements" (owner). The amount+direction guard could not deliver that, because the two sources decompose the same event differently: Frollo bundles the Wise fee into the transfer (10001.13) where the statement itemises it (10000.00 + 1.13). So 38 Wise USD rows passed the amount guard as new while being the same money, and were the reason the transactions view showed a USD figure where every neighbouring row showed AUD. A statement's billing_end_date is a hard watermark: everything on that account up to that date is already in the ledger, itemised and converted. Guard 1 now drops any feed row at or before its account's newest statement. Guard 2 (amount + direction) stays as the net for accounts that have no statement at all. Note this is the coverage test the first import needed and got wrong. That one asked whether a row's date fell inside a statement's min-max window, which for periods spanning 182 to 460 days swallows a year and answers nothing. The watermark asks a question that has an answer: up to what date is this account complete? Matching is on last4, verified against the live statement set — the eight in-scope accounts with statements each map to one bank, no cross-bank collision. The watermarks are printed by the CLI so a wrong boundary is visible rather than inferred from a row count. Re-imported from empty: 425 covered by statement, 15 amount twins, 110 inserted. Exactly one row now carries a foreign currency with no AUD figure — the 2026-08-12 HDR salary, which is the genuinely-new pre-statement row this feed exists for. Was 39.	2026-08-13 12:36:08 +10:00
siddharthd	afd75d3f09	transactions: never print a foreign amount as AUD ... The amount cell rendered formatAmount(amount_aud ?? amount) with no currency argument, so a row with no AUD figure fell back to its native amount and was stamped with a dollar sign. A USD 10,782.00 Wise credit showed as "+$10,782.00" in a column of AUD figures — the same payment from the statement, one row above, correctly showed $15,518.53 over USD 10,782.00. So the feed row read as $10,782 AUD when the real value is about $15,500, and the sub-line just repeated the same number correctly labelled. amount_unconverted is already selected by the transactions query (queries.ts:298) and was simply unused here. When set, the native figure becomes the headline and the absence of a rate is stated rather than papered over. Pre-existing rather than Frollo's: any row with amount_aud NULL and a foreign currency hits it, including foreign order-receipt rows. Frollo made it visible at scale — 39 rows.	2026-08-13 12:32:17 +10:00
siddharthd	2738213a23	docs: record the ledger-duplicate guard and why awaitsStatementLine is gone	2026-08-13 12:24:59 +10:00
siddharthd	bb8a009e02	frollo: don't re-import what the ledger already has, and stop hiding the queue ... The first import wrote 550 rows on 2026-08-13. 422 of them (77%) were second copies of transactions the ledger already held from statements — $1,023,824.63 of movement counted twice. The owner found it by opening the transactions view and seeing one HDR Global salary listed twice, once as A$15,518.53 from the statement and once as US$10,782.00 from the feed. The currency was never the defect. toLedgerRow already left amount_aud NULL and named the currency in foreign_currency_code, which is the documented contract for a row whose AUD value is unknown, and the transactions page labels it. What made it look wrong was the duplicate sitting beside it. Two changes. Upstream, ingestFrolloCsv now drops rows the ledger already holds, matching on amount + direction within LEDGER_MATCH_DAYS (3). Three things had to be right and the first two were not, each caught only by rehearsing against real data rather than fixtures: - pg returns a DATE as a JS Date while Prisma and the CSV give strings. String(date).slice(0,10) is "Wed Mar 10", which parses to NaN, so the first dry run reported 550 to insert and zero duplicates. dayMs() takes both. - Direction has to be in the key. This ledger is full of internal transfers between the owner's own accounts and the feed carries both legs: 2026-05-18 has +3076.04 into ANZ and -3076.04 out of AMP. Matching on amount alone let the credit leg consume the ledger's debit row, so the real duplicate was written — 20 rows got in that way. - 'refund' is money in. The feed calls a reversed account fee a credit and the statement importer types it 'refund'; classifying it as an outflow left every ANZ servicing-fee reversal behind. Downstream, awaitsStatementLine() is removed. Its premise — feed rows never await a statement line — was asserted, never tested, and false for almost every account. Worse is how it got there: the reconcile queue jumped 8 -> 558 when the feed landed, that jump was read as noise and filtered away, and filtering it removed the only mechanism that would ever have collapsed the duplicates. The queue was right. A feed row IS a row awaiting its statement line. Re-imported: 375 dropped as already-on-ledger, 175 inserted. Residual duplicates 4 rows / $15.01, all sub-$5 account fees where several identical amounts fall in overlapping windows and greedy consumption picks the wrong one; not chased further at this scale. The CLI prints the already-on-ledger count even when zero — a number you have to go looking for is a number nobody looks at.	2026-08-13 12:23:01 +10:00
siddharthd	3e826a317b	CLAUDE.md: document the Frollo account feed and the new reconcile exclusion ... Two things a future reader would otherwise have to reverse-engineer. The reconcile queue now excludes account-feed rows for a reason unrelated to payment method: a feed row is the account's own ledger entry, not a receipt awaiting a statement line, because the importer only covers accounts whose statements are deliberately not imported. Measured, the queue went from 8 to 558 without it. And the de-duplication rule needs its history attached, because the obvious version is wrong in a way that passes tests: keeping close-id rows as genuine repeats survived 29 tests and a clean dry run while still doubling three salary payments. In-scope duplicate pairs have id gaps from 58 to 260 million; real repeats sat at 1-4.	2026-08-13 11:29:08 +10:00
siddharthd	21e9e765a3	Add /api/frollo/ingest so the import can run unattended ... Shares one module with the CLI rather than reimplementing the insert: frollo-ingest.ts holds parsing, scoping, de-duplication and the write, and both callers pass in their own SQL executor (Prisma in the route, a pg client in the script). The alternative is two implementations of the same insert, which is how the pantry healthcheck came to be fixed in one repo and left broken in the other. The route refuses rather than guesses. findAnomalies() returns every reason an unattended run should stop - a configured account contributing no rows, an unrecognised account, a near-consecutive-id collapse that might be a real repeat, a batch over ~200 rows, or an export taken with pending included - and the route answers 409 having written nothing. Two defects the wiring surfaced. Deliberately excluded credit cards were reported as unknown accounts, which would have raised the new-account anomaly on every single run and left the automatic path permanently refusing; EXCLUDED_ACCOUNTS now distinguishes excluded from unknown. And pending was tested after account scope, so pending rows on cards - which is all of them so far - classified as out-of-scope and the wrong-export-option signal could never fire; pending is now tested first.	2026-08-13 11:19:27 +10:00
siddharthd	493ff6f631	Import Frollo account feeds for the accounts statements don't cover ... Credit cards keep arriving as monthly statements and stay the source of truth for them. This covers the other fourteen accounts, whose statements arrive every 182 to 460 days — AMP including the loan, ANZ Access, Wise including the income account, Up, ING, and the small transaction accounts. About 50 rows a month, where the alternative is downloading each statement by hand. The file needs three defences, all found by diffing three real exports (smarthome DECISIONS.md ING-11): A CDR re-consent makes Frollo re-ingest an account's whole history under fresh transaction ids while the originals survive, and consents expire annually. On this export 112 rows were such twins, and every HDR salary payment appeared twice — importing blind doubles reported income. dedupe() collapses each natural-key group to its lowest id, lowest because old ids were a strict subset of new across two exports, so source_ref stays stable and a re-import inserts nothing. An earlier version of that rule kept close-id rows on a 10,000 threshold, reasoning that genuine same-day repeats have consecutive ids. Verifying it against the income rows killed it: in-scope duplicate pairs have id gaps from 58 to 260 million, so no threshold separates them from the gaps of 1-4 that real repeats showed. It now collapses unconditionally and flags anything within 10 for review — the errors are asymmetric, and nothing in scope has ever tripped the flag. A lapsed consent removes an account from the export silently, with no error and no marker; the row count just drops. So the import asserts the account roster and refuses to run when a configured account contributes nothing. Also holds these rows out of the pending-reconciliation queue. A feed row is the account's own ledger entry, not a receipt awaiting a statement line — these accounts' statements are deliberately not imported — so without the exclusion 550 rows a year would bury the receipts that need a decision. The queue stays at 8 instead of 558. Foreign rows follow order-ingestion's existing shape: amount is the native figure, foreign_currency_code names it, amount_aud stays NULL rather than asserting a rate, and AMOUNT_UNCONVERTED already reports the balance as incomplete. Dry run by default. Verified against the real export before applying: 550 rows inserted, 14 accounts, re-run inserts 0.	2026-08-13 10:49:35 +10:00
siddharthd	2c666236b2	orders: share the merchant tidy, and fix two bugs the corpus run found (board 212) ... The tidy existed but lived inside the list page, so the DETAIL page never had it: following a row through showed "Apple" becoming "Apple Pty Ltd." Moved to src/lib/merchant-label.ts and applied on both surfaces. Running it over all 1,451 distinct merchant names — rather than over examples — turned up two real defects: Coburger & Co -> "Coburger &" eBay Commerce Australia Pty Ltd. -> "EBay Commerce Australia" The first strips a suffix that is part of the brand and leaves a dangling connector. The second is the capitalisation rule firing on "starts with a lower-case letter" when what it means is "is a bare domain" — mangling a brand that is deliberately lower-cased. Both are now guarded, and re-running over the full corpus reports 170 names tidied and 0 defects. PRESENTATION ONLY. It merges nothing and must never decide two rows are the same merchant. Amazon.in stays Amazon.in — a different marketplace with different currency and geography, not a name variant — and there is a test asserting it can never equal amazon.com.au. Kogan.com, GOG.com, AliExpress.com and Catch.com.au are real brand names containing a TLD and are left alone. Real unification is the merchant-alias bridge, ticket 176, which has already merged what can be merged safely. The five names that read alike after tidying (ebay/eBay/eBay Inc., menulog/Menulog Pty Ltd, deliveroo/Deliveroo, grab/Grab, paypal/PayPal) are genuinely one merchant each, so reading alike is correct. Lower-case platform SLUGS are deliberately not capitalised: "ebay" -> "Ebay" is wrong, and getting it right is the registry's job, not the stylesheet's.	2026-08-12 21:07:50 +10:00
siddharthd	215303161b	orders: bring the lifecycle-only toggle's numbers up to date (board 210) ... The count moved three times on 2026-08-12 and the history is the point: 755 when the predicate was written 904 after board 219 turned unstated zeros into NULLs — those 149 rows had been failing the "no amount" test on a technicality 699 after 210a retired 205 Amazon "share your experience" mails, which were never lifecycle events at all 620 after 210b joined 79 phantoms to their real parent, placebo-verified at a 1.9% error rate What is left is the corpus coverage ceiling rather than a defect — a mail whose parent is not in the corpus has nothing to join to — and the tooltip now says that instead of describing the whole class as an open ingestion defect.	2026-08-12 20:38:43 +10:00
siddharthd	3b5e495ca4	orders phase 2: order_transaction_links, and move every reader to it (board 205) ... Phase 1 read linkage out of expense_metadata, which is shaped as ONE ROW PER TRANSACTION — transaction_id UNIQUE, matched_transaction_id partial-unique — so every multiplicity it expresses is smuggled through a string key (0029 keys split shipments <entity_key>#f<fact_id>). A BNPL plan needs four rows against one order and has no such trick available. Migration 0030 adds order_transaction_links (many-to-many, keyed on entity_key rather than entities.id: finance-app does not model the spine and must not hold an FK across a boundary a re-extraction can decompile) and backfills all 63 existing bridge rows. THE UNIQUENESS RULE WAS WRONG FIRST TIME, in the most on-brand way available. It read (entity_key, leg_kind, COALESCE(leg_index, 0)), so two shipment legs of the same order — both leg_index NULL — collapsed to one key and ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING dropped one SILENTLY. Caught only because the backfill reported 62 against 63 candidates. The row it ate was order_amazon_249-4859367-0690246's $130.00 second shipment, the same order named in migration 0029's comment as the reason split shipments need distinct keys at all. What identifies a leg depends on its kind: an instalment by its INDEX, a shipment by its FACT, a whole-order charge by neither. ALL FOUR READERS MOVE TOGETHER, links first with expense_metadata as fallback: - LINK_LATERAL (list txn_count/first_txn_id, and the has_transaction facets that read it) - the detail page's transactions query - /api/transactions/[id]/order - the order_ctx lateral in queries.ts Moving fewer is not a smaller change, it is an inconsistent one: the matcher's four links for order_ebay_14-11714-95953 come with no expense_metadata row, so a half-move would show four instalments on the detail page while the list said txn_count = 0 and put the order on the wrong side of BOTH has_transaction filters. Verified after: detail 4 legs, list txn_count 4, has_transaction=yes includes it, =no excludes it. UNION not UNION ALL on transaction_id — after the backfill the same charge is legitimately in both stores and counting it twice would show "2 charges" on a single-payment order. order_platform is deliberately NOT coalesced with the link's platform. It gates the receipt disclosure arrow on /transactions, and a BNPL leg has no receipt behind it — filling it in put an arrow on four Afterpay rows that expand to nothing, which is the exact promise the arrow exists to avoid making. Separate leg fields carry the sub-line instead ("1 of 4 - DJI Air 3 Fly More Combo"). order-details.tsx now also requires a real receipt (platform present) before rendering, because the endpoint can answer with a link alone. Two invariant views, both empty and expected to stay so: order_link_orphans (spine re-keying silently orphans a TEXT key — bridge links are rebuildable, `manual` ones are lost curation) and order_link_drift (the two stores disagreeing). The plan's suggested fix for drift — widening the bridge's NOT EXISTS guard to "neither store has it" — was NOT taken: the expense_metadata INSERT has no ON CONFLICT, so re-attempting an order that already has a receipt row would duplicate it. Detecting is cheap; a non-idempotent re-write is not. Unchanged: order_feed 6,265, order_spend AUD 4,895 / $442,651.80. Links 75.	2026-08-12 20:29:42 +10:00
siddharthd	6b9b5fe518	orders: badge the annual summary receipts (board 211) ... Migration 033 adds entity_orders.summarises_period; order_spend drops those rows and order_feed keeps them. Unbadged, a $2,376 annual tax receipt restating twelve monthly donations renders as the largest single purchase of the year, so both surfaces say what it is: - /orders — a "year summary" chip beside the auth badges - /orders/<key> — a banner in the same shape as the settled-rail one, saying the monthly debits are in the ledger under their own dates The amount is deliberately still shown. It is the year's giving total and the reason the row is worth keeping; it just belongs to no total on the page. The detail page already falls back to o.order_total when order_spend has no row, which is exactly the case now — verified: gross_total null, order_total 2125.5.	2026-08-12 20:12:36 +10:00
siddharthd	231ef3411a	orders: record why line items may not exempt a row from the phantom filter ... Board 219 nulled 263 unstated zero totals in the spine, which moved 149 rows into the lifecycle-only hide predicate — they had been failing its "no amount" test on a technicality, an unstated 0 they should never have carried, while matching the phantom signature on every other count. Tried exempting rows that carry line items, on the theory that naming what was bought proves a purchase. It surfaced 442 rows and the first window checked showed why it is wrong: the Amazon "Ordered:" mail that mints a msg- phantom carries the item list too, so Xelsluthe and YIWENTEC each rendered TWICE again — the exact complaint this page was fixed for today. Reverted, and the reason recorded in place so it is not re-attempted. Items do not separate an orphan purchase from an item-carrying echo. Only deduplication does, and that is board 210. No behaviour change from the previous commit; comments and counts only.	2026-08-12 18:26:24 +10:00
siddharthd	699e4a2ddd	orders: cast cadence order_count to int — BigInt broke every recurring merchant ... order_merchant_cadence.order_count is a count(*), so BIGINT, and JSON.stringify throws on it: 'Do not know how to serialize a BigInt', a 500 carrying no SQL. It fires only where a cadence EXISTS, so the failure hid behind the merchant_entity_id fault and reappeared the moment that was fixed — St. Ali (40 orders, 14-day cadence) still 500'd while Amazon opened fine.	2026-08-12 17:12:14 +10:00
siddharthd	79940202f1	orders: fix the 42703 that broke EVERY order detail page ... getOrderDetail joined order_merchant_cadence on merchant_entity_id. Migration 021 rekeyed that view to merchant_key (merchant_entity_id is NULL on ~9% of the feed, and duplicate merchant entities split one shop's history); 027 and 029 moved order_feed and order_spend across, and this query was missed. Every /orders/<key> request has since failed with column rec.merchant_entity_id does not exist The reason nobody saw a 500 is the second half of this commit: the page collapsed every failure into 'That order could not be found.' A server fault wearing the costume of a data condition reads as an empty spine and gets investigated in the wrong repo. The hook now carries the status and only a genuine 404 says the order is missing.	2026-08-12 17:10:13 +10:00
siddharthd	9790b64e1d	orders: badge sender authentication, not source_trust ... source_trust is 'untrusted_external' on 100% of rows — every order came from email — so the badge marked every row and discriminated nothing. auth_verdict (migration 029) does: 93% pass, and the 7% that do not are the ones worth seeing. Adds the injection-scanner flag beside it.	2026-08-12 17:10:04 +10:00
siddharthd	1b34cd65d8	orders: restore the design the prototype had, and stop repeating the row ... Rebuilding the prototype in React quietly dropped most of what made it read well. Side by side, the live page had lost the year strip entirely — which was both the hero and the context for the date range — along with the masthead totals, the A$ prefix on amounts, and the Fraunces wordmark. The trust marker rendered as a tofu box. Restored, with the strip clickable so a bar scopes to that year. Also three content fixes, all visible the moment anyone looked at a real page. The title and the manifest were printing the same text twice on 1,964 of 4,649 itemised rows — 42% — because on a single-item order the order title IS the line item. The title now earns its line only when it says something the items do not. Food line items carry the full customisation: one Subway order runs to 450 characters naming every topping, and it swamped everything around it. Rows show a short form, cut at the first bracket where there is one, since "Footlong (Italian Herb…" is the product and the bracket is the customisation. Rows now expand, following the disclosure pattern the transactions page already uses, and the query fetches twelve items rather than three so opening one costs no round trip. Merchant names get a presentational tidy — corporate suffixes dropped, a lower-cased domain capitalised. This never merges two merchants: the estate holds amazon.com.au, Amazon.in and Amazon Services Australia as three distinct entities, and Amazon.in must stay separate because it is a different marketplace rather than a name variant. Actually unifying them is the merchant-alias bridge.	2026-08-12 13:28:06 +10:00
siddharthd	c05c4b5a35	orders: show the context, not just the row ... The first cut rendered entity_orders and nothing else, and it read like a table dump: a courier tracking notice and a subscription payment both presented as retail purchases, merchants shown as sender-domain slugs, and no indication that the same coffee roaster had been billing fortnightly for two years. Rows now carry what the ingestion layer already knew. A kind badge from content_class distinguishes a delivery notice, an invoice, a booking and a subscription from an actual purchase — NULL stays unbadged rather than being labelled a purchase, because 48% of rows predate the interpretation index and "unknown" is not "order". display_name shows the resolved merchant (98% of rows) instead of the slug. A recurrence badge marks merchants billing on a cadence, which is derived from the gaps between orders rather than stated anywhere in the mail. And the order's own title now appears when it differs from the merchant, so the manifest is not the only detail on the row. Adds the services lane for bookings, invoices and subscriptions — things with no goods and no delivery, where the retail columns are dead space.	2026-08-12 12:50:03 +10:00
siddharthd	b26d526e83	orders: a browse surface for the purchase history the ledger cannot show ... The spine holds ~6,300 purchase orders back to 2006, ~4,600 of them itemised, and 61 reach a transaction. Everything else has been visible only through SQL. This adds /orders and /orders/[entityKey] over it. The point of the page is the manifest. /transactions can only ever say "AMAZON AU MARKETPLACE SYDNEY"; a row here says what was in the box, which is the one thing the ledger structurally cannot carry. Five lanes, because the shapes genuinely differ — retail ends refunded or returned 14.1% of the time against food's 5.1%, food has no meaningful ETA where grocery has one on 54.8% of orders, digital never ships at all. The lane comes from order_lane() in migration 018 rather than a column, because slug 'uber' carries 394 taxi rides and 485 Eats orders. Defaults to this year: 449 orders rather than 6,283. Twenty-one years is the archive, not the working set. Three things the data forced. Unknown amounts render "not stated", never $0.00, because 1,648 orders have no amount and a zero would be false. A full reversal strikes the figure through; a partial refund does not, since striking $191.40 when $13.33 came back is a lie — the charge stays primary and the credit sits under it with the net. And rows with no amount, no reference and one lifecycle event are hidden by default, which lifts amount coverage from 74% to 84%; the toggle says on its face that it is a workaround for board 210 rather than a fix. Reads are raw SQL in lib/order-feed.ts rather than queries.ts: the spine is written by the ingestion-engine, is not in prisma/schema.prisma and never will be, and mixing it into a file where everything is Prisma-modelled would destroy that invariant. /orders is gated by an explicit viewer allowlist. Not because the three people listed need protecting from each other — everything here is on one person's cards — but because a participant is an accounting entity and any participant row with an email is a login. Adding someone to split a holiday must not silently hand them the purchase history. Verified live: gate returns 403 for non-participants and for a missing identity header; search "drone" finds the DJI order through its line items; the detail page renders its three lifecycle events and its Afterpay settlement sibling; and a bridged Amazon order shows both split-shipment charges.	2026-08-12 12:15:16 +10:00
siddharthd	872da3b12c	shared page: window the rendered rows — DOM no longer grows with history ... The table rendered every split row (1,279 today, ~600/yr growth), so page weight was unbounded even after the re-render fix. Render the first 100 of the filtered/sorted set with Show more (+100) / Show all; any filter or sort change resets the window. Data stays fully client-side on purpose — search still counts matches across all history — only the DOM is capped. Headless-measured expand stall: 165ms -> 35ms.	2026-08-10 19:46:58 +10:00
siddharthd	b4f28010df	shared page: fix expand freeze — cache date formatter, memoize rows ... Expanding a receipt on /shared froze the browser: this table renders every split row at once (1,279 today), and one state change re-rendered all of them. 520ms of each pass was formatDate constructing a fresh Intl.DateTimeFormat per call (2,558 calls per render); the rest was rebuilding 1,279 rows to change one. Headless-measured click stall: 802ms -> 165ms on the server; slower machines multiply the former. - module-level DATE_FMT, reused - rows extracted into memoized SharedTxRow with stable callbacks - filter+sort wrapped in useMemo so unrelated renders skip it	2026-08-10 19:39:19 +10:00
siddharthd	0e5422919e	shared page: expandable receipt details on split transactions ... The item list existed only on the owner's transactions page — the person a meal or order was split WITH could see the amount but never what was in it. getSharedTransactions now carries the same order_platform LATERAL the transactions page uses, and rows with a receipt get the same disclosure arrow + OrderDetails expansion. The shared viewer is a split participant, so canAccessTransactions already authorises the order API for them; meal rows keep the verdict UI (the partner records their own), bridge rows stay review-free.	2026-08-10 18:27:16 +10:00
siddharthd	7f8e363b5b	order details: hide the review surface for spine-bridged retail rows ... Verdicts are the meal lane's feedback loop (loved/never steers the next restaurant order and the nudge card warns on re-order). Bridge rows (source='order-bridge': Amazon, eBay, Officeworks...) have no such loop, so ItemVerdictToggle and OrderVerdict stay hidden there. The order API now returns 'source'; OrderReceipt.platform widened to string — the bridge writes real platform slugs beyond the meal trio.	2026-08-10 18:02:51 +10:00
siddharthd	502e3f563c	0029: rescope uq_expense_source_order for per-shipment bridge rows ... Split-shipment orders are charged per shipment; the spine bridge now writes one row per shipment sharing (source, order_reference). Meal-lane idempotency semantics unchanged (index scope excludes only source='order-bridge'); bridge rows get their own unique index on (source, source_message_id). Applied 2026-08-10.	2026-08-10 17:42:45 +10:00
siddharthd	7819a88af2	order-details: null item amounts render nothing, not $0.00; qty defaults to 1 ... Spine-bridged receipts (Amazon shipment notices, eBay) name the goods without per-item prices — null means 'the mail didn't say', and printing $0.00 would assert it did.	2026-08-10 13:37:39 +10:00
siddharthd	a1e776e9be	docs: quote the net trip phase figures, not the raw sums ... The phase queries apply NET_SPEND_ROWS and EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE like every other analytic, so committed is $21,229.56 rather than the $22,050.51 a raw sum gives. The $820.95 gap is a partial refund on the Luxury Escapes booking, and it is netted out on purpose.	2026-08-02 22:22:46 +10:00
siddharthd	9e4b518f57	Split a trip into its two economies, so travel stops being a 60% slab ... travel dominated every trip page and said nothing. The tempting fix is a finer travel taxonomy, which needs a hand-maintained merchant list — the trap #19 already describes — and it is also the wrong diagnosis. travel is the only category that spans both phases of a trip. Every other one is 100% on-the-ground: on Europe 2026, dining, transport, entertainment, groceries and shopping are all exactly $0.00 before departure. The chart was not bad, it was two economies stacked into one, and travel was the only thing visible in the union. So split on start_date and use the axis that carries information in each phase. Booked ahead ($22,050.51, 57%) is all flights and stays, so merchant is the axis — Agoda $4,490, Air India $3,454, Luxury Escapes $3,284. On the ground ($16,946.94) travel falls to $8,241 among dining $4,452 and transport $2,938, and category is finally worth charting. The hero is the ratio, not a lone total, with the on-ground daily rate beside it — the only figure comparable between trips, since totals are not: Europe $677.88/day against Auckland $83.39. A trip with near-zero committed spend says so, because Sonu + Sunny's $184.84 is a filing artefact (both legs' bookings sit on the first trip), not a cheap trip. Two dataviz rules this page was breaking. Category bars now use one copper hue with the name as a direct label: the per-bar rainbow double-encoded identity the label already carries, and the trip subset fails CVD validation on this surface (other vs shopping at delta-E 5.0 protan, below the floor of 6). And the hero figure drops the serif and tabular-nums, which read as decoration at that size. The phase bar is two ordinal steps of one hue, validated with --ordinal against the card surface, with a 2px gap so the boundary is an edge. 278 passing, build clean. Data verified against the database directly; I could not render the page in a browser to eyeball the layout.	2026-08-02 22:20:55 +10:00
siddharthd	2d341e24a0	A negative trip balance is over-coverage, not a bill ... You were right and my label was wrong. A payment is allocated to a trip as a lump sum, and the grouped-payment allocation gave each trip enough to clear the payer's gross share. So netting the other side off leaves a fully-paid trip negative by exactly what the payment over-covered: Europe reads -$802.75 because Sonu paid $8,004.04 against a net share of $7,201.30. That surplus is already carried in the overall balance, where she still owes $5,313.38 — nothing is owed to her, and "you owe them" said the opposite. The arithmetic never changed; only what the page claims it means. paid_to_me is the discriminator: negative with a payment into the scope is over-coverage, negative with no payment is genuinely owed because the viewer's share of the other person's spending exceeds theirs. Both cases now tested. All three of today's negatives are the first kind. The trip table gains an Overall balance column from the unscoped participant balances, because a single trip's figure cannot tell you whether to pay anyone, and the footnote now says settlement is always against the overall figure. 278 passing, build clean.	2026-08-02 21:52:51 +10:00
siddharthd	6db2345c49	Net the trip debt to one figure, and show payer, category and search on Shared ... Shared view: the query already returned owner_name and effective_category, the table just never rendered them. Paid by sits next to Splits because together they are whose money went out and whose share it was. Search is client-side — this endpoint returns all 1,267 split rows in one request with no pagination, so there is nothing for a round-trip to narrow, and the sort was already client-side. It matches description, merchant, notes, category and payer, but not participant names: the dropdown does that, and "sonu" matching every row she is split on would read as broken. Trip owed collapses to one settle-up figure per person, with the breakdown beside it so the net is auditable rather than asserted. I argued against netting a few hours ago and was wrong. The claim was that the grouped-payment allocation cleared each trip against the one-directional gross, so netting would redefine that debt after the fact. The rows say otherwise: Europe's $802.75 is 56 transactions Sonu actually paid across Rome, Venice, the Dolomites, Bellagio, Lucerne and Paris on which I hold 25%, and paid_by_me is $0.00 on every row of every trip because nothing has ever been recorded going from me to her. Her side looked settled only because the allocation derived her payment split from her gross, so it lands on zero by construction. The one-directional view was hiding a live obligation, not protecting an allocation. Nets now: Auckland Sonu +$1,077.25, Europe Sonu -$802.75, Sonu + Sunny -$936.34, Europe Molina -$816.16. Also correcting an error in my own reporting: I said Auckland's mirror was $0.00. It is $428.39 — 17 Auckland rows Sonu paid that I hold a split on. Two ad-hoc verification queries mis-joined on a nullable scope column and under-reported the mirror side. The app code was never affected and the owed column is still byte-identical. The footnote now states the trap the netting exposes: a debt settled by a payment left on the household tab still reads as outstanding on the trip. Payment 5 (Molina to Sonu, $1,605.49) is exactly that case and is left alone as a data decision. 277 passing, build clean.	2026-08-02 21:19:40 +10:00
siddharthd	cb7665ded1	Let everyone on a trip see it, and give payments their scope back ... Trips were scoped to trips.owner_id, so Sonu saw no trips at all — despite having paid for 104 of the tagged rows herself. Her own spending was invisible on the only page organised around it. A participant is now anyone with a split on, who paid for, or whose payment is scoped to, a transaction tagged to the trip. Derived, not stored. A trip_participants table was designed and rejected: the expenses already carry the fact, and two records of one fact drift apart. Deriving it also excludes Singapore + Bangkok 2026 from Sonu for free, which a table would have to be kept in sync to do. Siddharth 4 trips, Sonu 3, Molina 1. Everything about a trip is shared except delete. Both trip foreign keys are ON DELETE SET NULL, so deleting Europe 2026 untags 210 transactions and NULLs the trip scope on 6 payments — where the hand-derived Europe-first allocation lives, which nothing recomputes. That stays with the owner. Trip owed now returns both directions and nets neither. An obligation lives on a row someone else paid for, so a viewer-as-payer figure can never hold it, and Sonu's Europe read "you are owed $2,408.24" while omitting the $8,004.04 she owed. Collapsing the two into a signed net is the tempting next step and would have corrupted the scope allocation: the grouped-payment allocation cleared each trip against the one-directional gross, so redefining the debt afterwards turns $8,004.04 already allocated into an $802.75 over-allocation with household understated by the same amount. Verified byte-identical — Auckland $1,505.64, Europe Molina -$816.16, Europe Sonu $0.00, Sonu + Sunny $0.00. getTransactions gained trip_all_rows so a participant sees the whole trip. It is opt-in and not implied by trip_id, because the same endpoint backs the main transactions list and its trip filter must keep owner scoping. Participation is re-checked in SQL, so passing the flag for someone else's trip returns nothing. Payments can finally say what they settle. trip_id has existed since migration 0022 but POST never read it and GET never returned it, so every payment made in the app landed on household and the 9 trip-scoped rows were hand-written SQL. "Both" needs no new shape — one row per scope sharing a linked_transaction_id. Three write paths had no authorisation at all and were reachable by any participant: assignTransactionsToTrip checked nothing, DELETE on a payment deleted by bare id, and POST accepted any from/to pair. All three now check. Also fixes the test suite, which was pointing at postgres-pantry: container IPs move on recreation and 172.22.0.47 stopped being postgres-personal. It only failed safe because the credentials did not match — resetDB now refuses to truncate anything not named personal_test. 22 new tests, 276 passing, build clean.	2026-08-02 19:11:19 +10:00
siddharthd	6e179d3a0a	docs: put the UI review's priorities 1-4 on the board, and correct two claims ... The review was written 2026-07-26 and last touched 2026-07-29, one day before the board replaced ACTIONS.md, so it was never migrated. Priorities 1-4 existed only in this file. They are now epic #154 with #155-#159 under it. Two claims in the doc were wrong. It said Priority 0 was guarded by analytics-sql.test.ts; that file covers the three SQL fragments and nothing else, so items 2, 3 and 6 -- pace/headline parity, the fees date range, and partial-month comparison -- have no test at all. Those are the three where a regression is silent, which is why the gap is worth a ticket rather than a note. And it predated two changes in the same metric-integrity family: the signed investments line (c70d2b1) and transfers hidden by default (f6c500b). The first matters to the doc directly -- the cashflow strip it describes now carries a signed invested figure, so a negative month is data rather than a bug.	2026-08-02 16:44:04 +10:00
siddharthd	dbc6fd1352	Add source identity to transactions so a feed can be re-imported safely ... The CSV importer has no idempotency and structurally cannot have any: batchInsertCSVTransactions assigns row_index = MAX(row_index) + 1, and row_index is the fifth column of uq_transaction_identity, so the constraint is guaranteed a fresh value on every run. The same file imported twice produces two full sets of rows and nothing objects. Tolerable for the hand-driven bank CSV this was built for. Not tolerable for any recurring feed, whose windows overlap by design — and not cleanable afterwards, since every child of transactions is ON DELETE CASCADE, so a duplicate must be superseded rather than deleted (0023). ~$42k of re-imported statement rows already show how that goes. source_ref carries the provider's own key verbatim, enforced by a partial unique index rather than an application-side ON CONFLICT that a refactor can quietly drop. Found while evaluating Frollo (DECISIONS.md ING-11 in the smarthome repo). That feed is not being ingested — 88% of it duplicates existing statement coverage — but this gap is real independently of it.	2026-08-01 22:13:07 +10:00
siddharthd	c70d2b1fac	Sign the investments line so withdrawals net against contributions ... A withdrawal from a fund is a disinvestment, not income: units convert back to cash and net worth is unchanged. Summed unsigned it read as more money invested. March 2026 showed $38,615.34 of investing in a month that was net -$11,384.66, because a $25,000 Raiz withdrawal was added to an $8,563.80 IBKR deposit instead of cancelling it. Each credit costs twice — once for being added, once for not being subtracted — so the error is double the credit: $50,000 in March, $3,000 in May 2025, $53,000 across the window. Since net = income - spent - investments, March's net of -$55,918.73 should read -$5,918.73. Filing withdrawals as income is the other tempting answer and is worse: it books an asset disposal as earnings and feeds the same figure into net with a flattering sign. Same reason the Up item sales in Known Gaps do not belong on the income line. What this cannot resolve: part of a withdrawal genuinely is income — the capital gain. The bank descriptor is one gross figure with no cost base, so it cannot be decomposed from statement data. Netting tracks cash committed against cash returned and leaves the gain for holdings data to surface; it does not assert the gain is zero. The budget page gates the Invested card on `!== 0` rather than `> 0` — a net-disinvesting month is real data, not an empty one — and renders negative months in amber so the sign is not hidden by matching digits.	2026-07-31 00:05:05 +10:00
siddharthd	f6c500b27a	Hide transfers in the transactions view by default ... Transfers move money between your own accounts; at 433 of 3,996 rows (~11%) they crowd out the rows that represent actual spending. getTransactions gains `exclude_categories`, opt-in per caller and deliberately not defaulted in queries.ts: the rules preview and the bulk rule-apply path both read candidate rows through getTransactions, and a default exclusion there would silently shrink what a rule can see and reach — invisibly, since a rule that matches nothing looks the same as a rule with nothing to do. Two behaviours the filter needs, both tested: - An explicit category pick beats the exclusion. Selecting "Transfers" while the default is on subtracts it from the hidden list instead of returning zero rows and reading as "you have no transfers". - COALESCE the effective category to '' before `<> ALL`. NULL <> ALL(...) is NULL, not true, so an uncategorised row would disappear from a filter that never named its category — the trap EXCLUDE_NON_SPEND already documents. The default is off when the view is scoped to a statement: that is a reconciliation view, the row count has to match the statement, and a credit-card payment is the row you went there to check.	2026-07-30 23:34:31 +10:00
siddharthd	549abd8cca	docs: point work tracking at the board, not ACTIONS.md ... Status for this app now lives on the Vikunja board (saved filter finance-app), which replaced the smarthome repo's ACTIONS.md on 2026-07-30. Notes the thing a single-label filter hides: a ticket can carry several system labels — the receipt→pantry work is finance-app, pantry-app and email-ingestion at once — so the finance filter is a view, not the boundary of what will touch this codebase. Also records the one dated item here: postgres-personal runs PostgreSQL 14, EOL 2026-11-12, and it holds statements, transactions, orders and expense_metadata.	2026-07-30 23:12:50 +10:00
siddharthd	a465b147a3	Read receipt lines under the keys the receipt panel renders ... The order-details panel reads qty/description/amount from expense_metadata.line_items. A grocery shop is a receipt like any other, so it stores the same keys rather than name/quantity/line_total — otherwise the rows arrive complete and display blank, which is exactly the failure ING-8 names. unit and category are the two fields a grocery line has and a delivery line does not; nothing renders them yet and the category composition will.	2026-07-30 13:51:33 +10:00
siddharthd	17028c79ff	Accept grocery receipts scanned in pantry as candidate spend ... Adds /api/receipts/ingest as a sibling to the order lane, sharing its shape but making one decision differently: nothing is parked. An order can wait for its statement because it is already visible as an email; a gift-card grocery shop is visible nowhere at all, so a scan that produces no transaction produces nothing anyone can see. Every payment becomes a manual row immediately and the existing pending-reconciliation queue resolves the ones with a card leg coming. One transaction per tender leg. A $114.57 shop settled $40.75 gift card + $73.82 Mastercard has a statement line for $73.82 only. A single row marked credits is excluded from the queue while that line double-counts; marked card it is searched for at 1% of $114.57 and never matches. Either way the shop books $188.39. Per-leg rows make each amount the settled amount, so the matcher works untouched. Reconciliation now carries expense_metadata across. It already moved overrides, tags and splits from the manual row to the statement row and left metadata behind, which did not matter while metadata only came from an email that made its own transaction. It matters now that it carries a shop's line items: unmoved, the contents vanish at exactly the moment the statement line appears, and COLES 0556 MANOR LAKES stays as unreadable as before anything was scanned. transaction_id is UNIQUE, so a statement row that already has metadata keeps it and the pantry row is flagged rather than raising a constraint violation. Also regenerates the Prisma model. card_last4, currency, flags, reconciled_at, matched_transaction_id, platform and route have been in the database since migrations 0019/0020 and were absent from schema.prisma — regenerating the client from it would have dropped columns the order lane writes on every ingest. 23 integration tests against the real schema, built from the three receipts that drove the design. Existing suites unchanged: 104 unit, 144 integration.	2026-07-30 13:40:32 +10:00
siddharthd	69b3ed8ea9	docs: catch CLAUDE.md and the UI review up with the shared-expenses rebuild ... The redesign is live (2026-07-28); only the loan model remains a proposal. The UI review's 'settled is dead data' guidance described the pre-rebuild state and is superseded — settled now gates ACTIVE_OBLIGATION.	2026-07-29 22:22:42 +10:00
siddharthd	a56e5e2de5	docs: splits total 100%, and why the remainder is the owner's	2026-07-29 10:26:44 +10:00
siddharthd	22e4a1ead0	fix(splits): make every split account for 100% ... A 50/50 arrangement was stored as a single row saying "Sonu 50%". The arithmetic was never wrong — `myShare` resolves the payer's share as `100 - SUM(everyone else)`, so balances and per-user spend were correct throughout. It was still a bug, because a ledger is read as well as computed: on screen that row is a 50% share against a blank, which looks like half the money is unallocated and is indistinguishable from a split somebody abandoned half-finished. It also leaked. `getSharedTransactions` filters by participant with an EXISTS on an explicit split row, so filtering the Shared view by the payer silently dropped every transaction where their share was only ever implied. Four write paths could produce it, three of them unguarded: - the Slack nudge's share button, which inserted one row - `POST /api/transactions`, where the add form shows an amber total under 100 but saves anyway — this is how Lawn Mowing and Hedge Pruning were stored - `applyRuleActions`, where ten of the fourteen live split rules name only the other person `completeSplit` is now the single place that writes the remainder, and every one of those paths ends in it. The remainder goes to the transaction's *owner*, never to "me": the owner's row on their own transaction is excluded from both halves of the balance query, so it cannot create, enlarge or discharge a debt, whereas a row for me on someone else's transaction is a real obligation. That distinction is what makes this safe to apply to existing data. Also fixes the order panel's "Shared 50/50" toggle, which was inert in both directions: it posted a lone 50% row to share (rejected — must total 100%) and an empty array to un-share (rejected — array required), because no way to clear a split existed. DELETE on the splits route is that way. Backfill: 7 rows, verified against a row-level dump diff — 2549 -> 2556 rows, none removed, none modified — and participant balances byte identical before and after (Molina 19556.07, Sonu 20913.35). Every split in the database now totals 100%. Not done: a database-level constraint. Enforcing the sum needs a deferred constraint trigger, and the rule path commits its DELETE and INSERT as separate statements, so the trigger would reject the intermediate state. Making it work means wrapping every write path in a transaction, which is a larger change than the defect warrants.	2026-07-29 10:23:06 +10:00
siddharthd	dd0462a5f9	fix(orders): decode &bull; so item options separate again ... `&bull;` was missing from the entity table, and that was not cosmetic. DoorDash separates an item's name from its options with a bullet and parseDoorDashLineItems splits on the literal "•" — so left encoded, the split never happened and the line collapsed into the description: "Bucket and Side Pack (Meal Deals) &bull; Hot Bucket &bull; Chips" with options []. The entity showed on screen and the structure behind it was gone. Numeric entities are now decoded generically rather than one at a time, which is how &#36; came to be listed individually while its neighbours were not, and &amp; resolves last so a literal "&amp;bull;" stays as written instead of turning into a bullet. Repaired the 47 stored rows by re-parsing the captured email behind each one rather than string-replacing the entity, since a replacement would have fixed the display and left options [] underneath. Rehearsed first: all 47 re-parsed, all 47 gained options, 0 line items lost, 0 amounts changed. Old values kept in dump/rollback-line-items-20260728-223737.json. Pre-existing — 22 rows predate today — but the pre-cutover backfill more than doubled the affected rows, which is what surfaced it. Verified in the Order details panel, not in SQL.	2026-07-28 22:38:38 +10:00
siddharthd	3144cf3176	feat(orders): record credits orders from before the cutover ... I1 refused any credits-funded order dated before 2026-01-09, storing nothing at all — no transaction and no metadata, so the receipt was discarded rather than kept as history. Its reason was splits, not spend: before the cutover shared expenses lived in SplitMyExpenses, and re-importing them would double-charge against carryover transaction 2348. That reason expired with 788219b, where ACTIVE_OBLIGATION became `settled = false AND transaction_date >= '2026-01-09'`. A pre-cutover split can no longer assert a debt, so a pre-cutover order cannot move a balance however it is recorded — and ingestion writes no splits at any date, which now has a test of its own. What the guard was still doing was hiding ordinary history: 275 orders, $9,799.96 of meals and rides across 2020-2025, invisible only because the money came from a gift-card balance instead of a card. The funding side stays as it is, deliberately. Some of those orders were paid from ShopBack gift cards that are themselves booked as expenses, so that portion is counted twice. The exposure is bounded at $3,411.16 over 14 loads and is probably smaller: the descriptors name no brand — "ShopBack Gift Cards SQ" is a batch code, and the card could be Amazon, Airbnb or Shell as easily as DoorDash — and six are categorised `gifts`, which may be real presents rather than self-funding. Reclassifying them on a guess would corrupt correct data to fix a double-count that cannot be shown. Only the ShopBack purchase emails can settle it, joined on total paid.	2026-07-28 22:20:03 +10:00
siddharthd	fe104a9618	fix(orders): read both legs of an Uber payment ... Uber Cash IS credits, and the payment line had become unreadable in the newer layout: "Payments Uber Cash 10/17/25 8:50 PM A$54.87" carries a timestamp between the label and the amount, and writes the currency as a prefix. Both defeated the pattern, so credits_amount stayed null and the order was filed as card-settled — sent looking for a card leg that does not exist, found nothing, and left as an orphan with no transaction and no card tail to match on. 118 captured messages sit in that state, and every one of them is pre-cutover, so reading them correctly means I1 skips them rather than storing enrichment that points at nothing. The card leg had the same blind spot, hidden behind the first: the gap between the mask and the amount was [^\d]{0,40}, which a timestamp breaks. While BOTH legs were unreadable a mixed payment still looked consistent — the order read as card-settled for the full total. Fixing only credits reads half an order, which validateOrderTotals correctly refuses. Found exactly that way: four messages that validated before began failing "payments sum to 34.92 but receipt states 43.60". Legs are summed rather than taken first, because one order can be charged in instalments and an instrument can carry no mask at all (PayPal). But a leg that already equals the stated total IS the payment, not an instalment: a Dubai trip prints an AED 17.67 authorisation and then the AED 577.83 settled charge, and adding the hold overstates the trip. A mixed credits+card order is unaffected — neither leg equals the total there, which is why it needs summing. A/B over all 776 captures: 468 parsed by both, zero change to any amount, currency or existing card tail, 0 lost, 118 credits figures newly read. Mutation-tested: dropping the exact-leg rule fails 2 tests, dropping the Uber Cash read fails 7.	2026-07-28 21:59:35 +10:00
siddharthd	63aaf1eb21	fix(orders): read A$ totals and credits-funded receipts ... Two parse bugs that between them made 218 of 776 captured messages unreadable. Neither was the "old template" they were filed as. Uber writes the currency three ways and only two were handled. "Total A$54.87" is what it sends for ordinary Australian orders — A$ misses [A-Z]{3} by one character — so 98 of 275 Uber Eats mails and 78 of 275 trip mails failed with "no Total found" while the amount sat in plain sight. Most were 2024-2025, i.e. current mail. NZ$, US$, S$, HK$, C$ and a bare rupee/euro/pound symbol are handled the same way. A bare "$" is still left unresolved on purpose: a dozen currencies use it, and the body-wide scan that reads the receipt's own stated code should win. A DoorDash order paid from credits states "Total Charged $0.00" truthfully, above a real subtotal. Read literally that is a $0 order, and validateOrderTotals rejected 88 of them as non-positive — discarding exactly the credit-funded spend this pipeline exists to surface. The order's value is its subtotal; recording zero would show the order and hide what it cost. Guarded on the receipt actually saying credits, so an empty mail still fails rather than inheriting a stray subtotal, and the header cross-check stands down for these or it rejects the figure the parser deliberately overrode. Measured A/B over all 776 captures: 254 parsed by both parsers with zero change to any amount or currency, 0 lost, 214 newly readable. Both fixes mutation-tested — reverting the regex fails 4 tests, removing the credits branch fails 3. Fixtures are real captured receipts, per the 2026-07-26 rewrite: the earlier synthetic suite passed while the parser could not read a real email. No history replay — I7 idempotency refuses re-reads and that needs an explicit update mode. This fixes ingest from here on.	2026-07-28 20:32:02 +10:00
siddharthd	7cf247951a	docs: the verdict scale, and the two Slack rules that cost real data	2026-07-28 19:17:25 +10:00
siddharthd	d458228625	feat(orders): a fifth verdict, 'bad', between ok and never again ... The jump from "OK" to "Never again" is too big and most disappointments live in the gap (user, 2026-07-28) — so a merely poor meal either flattered itself as OK or got blacklisted. Only 'never' raises the warning on a future order. A blacklist that fires for every mediocre delivery is one nobody reads, so 'bad' records the disappointment without triggering the alarm. Both set order_again = false — you would not choose either again — and that split between "would I order it" and "warn me about it" is the point of the extra level. Migration widens the CHECK; nothing is removed, so no existing row needs mapping.	2026-07-28 19:12:26 +10:00
siddharthd	82f751cbf4	fix(slack): update the card via response_url, not the HTTP response ... Every press wrote correctly and then left the card showing stale state, so a working button looked dead — and a button that looks dead gets pressed again, which toggled the split back. That is how two orders got unshared while looking like nothing had happened. The cause was a wrong assumption in the original design: Block Kit interactivity ignores the HTTP response body. Replacing a message from the response is legacy attachment-style behaviour. The update has to go to payload.response_url, which needs no bot token — so it stays in the app rather than becoming another n8n node. Two things that were also invisible now speak up. The share guard used to return silently when it refused a three-way or uneven split, which is indistinguishable from a broken button; it now says which it was, as an ephemeral only the presser sees. Same for an unmapped Slack user. The response still echoes the rendered blocks. Slack ignores them, but it lets a card be rendered server-side without pressing anything — which is what stops the replay tooling from hand-writing a card with a guessed share state, the mistake that cost a real split earlier today.	2026-07-28 18:54:53 +10:00
siddharthd	9f0f38449b	feat(slack): ask the other person too, and put rating before sharing ... Two halves of the same requirement, one of which was quietly missing. Sharing split the money but never reached her: she is not in #smarthome, so the card whose caption said "both verdicts welcome" was one she could not see. Now a share DMs her a card of her own. A DM rather than adding her to the channel, so her surface stays "orders that concern me" instead of the whole house's ops feed. She was already in SLACK_USER_MAP, so her press files under participant 4. Only on the press that turns sharing ON, and only when someone else did the sharing. Re-notifying on every later rating press would turn one shared meal into a stream of DMs, which is how a nudge gets muted. Her card carries no share button: she is being told it was shared, not asked to decide, and two people toggling one split from separate copies of a card is a race with no upside. The app still holds no Slack bot token — it returns a notify instruction and n8n sends it, the same shape as the modal open. If SLACK_USER_MAP has no id for her the DM is skipped silently: the split is correct and complete either way, and failing the press over an unaddressable nudge would be the worse trade. Card reordered to rate -> details -> share. You judge the food, then decide who pays for it; asking "was this shared?" first inverts the order a person thinks in. The status caption moved under the share button it describes rather than sitting orphaned mid-card.	2026-07-28 18:33:25 +10:00
siddharthd	0595d49d5c	fix(orders): the restaurant is the merchant, not the courier ... Reverses a change made on request. The platform in the headline fragmented the merchant: the same restaurant read as two, depending on who carried the bag, and that is not a distinction anyone rating the food cares about. It also already has a home — the expandable Order details panel renders expense_metadata.platform next to its heading, which is where the user asked for it. The fragmentation was worse than cosmetic. merchantVerdict joined on an exact merchant_normalized, and the platforms capitalise differently ("TEG Kebabs & Biryani" on Uber Eats, "TEG KEBABS & BIRYANI" on DoorDash), so one restaurant kept two separate histories and a "never again" recorded through one app never warned in the other — silently defeating the point of the memory. Now case-folded; verified on real data, where the DoorDash order sees 1 prior verdict against 0 before. 81 existing descriptions backfilled in one transaction, dry-run first and dumped beforehand. The regex is anchored to the end so suburb parens survive: "Order - Coles (Wyndham Vale) (Uber Eats)" becomes "Order - Coles (Wyndham Vale)", not "Order - Coles".	2026-07-28 17:51:36 +10:00
siddharthd	50c5b7c430	fix(slack): don't let one tap flatten a hand-made split ... Splits on orders are made by hand, so a third participant or an uneven share is a deliberate decision — and "Make it just me" deleted every split row regardless. A one-tap button silently destroying an arrangement made with more care than the tap that undid it is the same failure shape as the rewrite that dropped `settled`. Now it refuses when a participant other than the two consumers is present, or when the share is not 50. Verified against the running stack: a three-way split and a 70/30 both survive a press; a plain 50/50 still toggles off and back on. Also: the nudge reads share state instead of assuming false. Today a freshly ingested order has no splits — the 140 that do were split by hand after the backfill, not by a rule — but the label drives a destructive button, so a wrong assumption there costs data rather than a cosmetic error. One query is cheaper.	2026-07-28 16:40:53 +10:00
siddharthd	14d6b40578	feat(slack): per-item verdicts and a note, in a Slack modal ... The card can rate an order but cannot ask which dish or why: a message cannot collect free text, and an actions block caps at 25 elements while item counts vary per receipt. A modal is the only Slack-native answer, and it stays inside Slack — no browser, no app, which is the whole reason it exists rather than a link. The overall rating deliberately stays on the card. That is the thing done every time and it should cost one tap; this is for when something was notably good or bad. finance-app holds no Slack bot token by design, so it returns the view and n8n — which already has the credential — calls views.open. One copy of the token, no new secret, no compose change. Item text travels in private_metadata because a submission returns block ids and values, never labels, so there is otherwise no way back to which dish a radio button referred to. Capped at 20 rows: a grocery order runs long and nobody scrolls a modal to rate a tin of tomatoes. The modal does NOT write the rating. A form that silently reset a decision the user did not revisit is the same class of bug as the split rewrite that dropped `settled`.	2026-07-28 16:33:10 +10:00
siddharthd	8fbcbc5f83	fix(slack): one select instead of four rating buttons ... Slack's mobile client gives every button in an actions block its own full-width row, so the four ratings rendered as four stacked bars and the nudge filled the screen (user, with a screenshot). A select is one row and still one decision. The interactive route now resolves both shapes — a button carries `value`, a select carries it on `selected_option`. Reading only the former would have left sharing working while rating silently did nothing.	2026-07-28 16:22:49 +10:00
siddharthd	aaa36dd75e	feat(slack): answer the order nudge in Slack, without opening the app ... Being sent to a web app to answer "was this shared?" is enough friction that the question stops getting answered — which is the exact failure the nudge exists to prevent. So the buttons now act in place: pressing "Shared 50/50" writes the transaction_splits row and edits the message, and the app is never opened. Slack does NOT reach this route directly. It posts to an n8n webhook that forwards the raw body and signature headers here (user's suggestion). That is the better shape: n8n already terminates public webhooks, so the app keeps its blanket OAuth chain and gains no internet-facing unauthenticated route, and no Traefik change is needed. n8n cannot verify the signature itself — its Code sandbox has no `require`, so no `crypto`. Two independent gates, both failing closed: the shared x-ingest-token (came from n8n) and Slack's v0 signature over the raw body (came from Slack, not replayed within 5 minutes). An unset signing secret rejects everything rather than waving it through, because the alternative turns a misconfigured deploy into an open write endpoint. An unmapped Slack user is refused rather than defaulted to the owner. In a two-person household a wrong attribution is not a rounding error, it is the other person's opinion recorded under your name. Block Kit is built in the app (ingest returns slack_blocks) rather than in n8n expressions: a template string is untestable, and this shape has to stay in step with what the interactive endpoint re-renders after each press. Null when there is no transaction yet — a card-settled order is parked until its statement arrives, so there is nothing to split or rate. Also: /transactions now honours ?q=, so the link lands on the row instead of the top of an unfiltered ledger.	2026-07-28 15:50:06 +10:00
siddharthd	66a6a51fb8	docs: order verdicts are built; record the four load-bearing shape decisions	2026-07-28 15:43:20 +10:00
siddharthd	b8919a4775	feat(transactions): honour ?q= so a link can land on one row ... The Slack order nudge links here. Without it the link drops you at the top of an unfiltered ledger and the merchant has to be found by hand, which is how a nudge stops being opened.	2026-07-28 15:34:24 +10:00
siddharthd	0cb46a087b	feat(orders): record what we thought of an order, per person ... The ledger already knew we had ordered from a place; it did not know the food was bad. Orders got repeated from places we disliked because nobody remembered by the time the next one went in. That is what the receipt ingestion was for (ING-9) and the last piece was missing: order_reviews existed as a table with no API, no UI and no writes. Four levels, not three. "Loved" and "liked" are both "would order again" but only one is worth a detour, and "ok" is not a recommendation. A verdict belongs to a person, not to an order. A shared meal produces two opinions and they routinely disagree — that disagreement is the useful part, and the old UNIQUE on transaction_id alone could not hold it. Now UNIQUE (transaction_id, participant_id), and the default is the signed-in user rather than the owner: Sonu authenticates through the same Traefik OAuth as participant 4, so an owner default would have filed her verdict under his name. Per-item opinions key on the item DESCRIPTION, not its index. An index is meaningless across orders; "the Pad Thai here is good" is the signal that has to survive into the next order from the same merchant. Only the two poles are offered — a per-item "ok" answers neither of the questions you ask at order time. Sharing is recorded as a real 50/50 split, not a decorative flag. The split already IS the record that an order was shared, and two records of one fact drift apart. An ABSENT item_verdicts means "leave them alone"; an empty array clears them. Without that distinction a note-only save silently wipes every per-item opinion — the same shape as the bug that reset `settled` on split rewrites, and just as invisible on screen. Mutation-tested: making keepItems a no-op fails exactly one test. mockDbWithPool gained queryRow. Omitting an export from the mock makes it undefined at the call site, which fails as "not a function" and reads like a code bug rather than a test-harness gap.	2026-07-28 15:31:22 +10:00
siddharthd	d081d80a3f	docs: rewrite the shared-expenses section, which had gone false ... Every warning in it was inverted by this week's work: - "settled is dead data, false on every row" -- there are now 1,266 settled splits across 657 pre-2026 transactions. - "do not fix getParticipantBalances to exclude settled splits" -- it now excludes them, via ACTIVE_OBLIGATION, and must. - "settlement cannot be attributed per trip" -- migration 0022 added split_payments.trip_id and it is attributed. - "splits exist from 2026-01-09 only" -- pre-2026 transactions are now split deliberately, to stop them inflating spend. Replaced with what is actually true, including the rule that matters most: the cutover DATE is the primary balance gate and the settled flag only refines it, so pre-2026 expenses can be split freely.	2026-07-28 14:41:05 +10:00
siddharthd	db6b7f8375	docs(shared): the cutover date is the gate, the flag refines it	2026-07-28 13:54:46 +10:00
siddharthd	788219b9fd	fix(splits): the cutover date, not a boolean, is what gates a balance ... Nothing dated before 2026-01-09 can be owed, because carryover transaction 2348 already carries the entire pre-cutover balance as a single figure. ACTIVE_OBLIGATION now says so directly. This inverts which mechanism is load-bearing, and that is the point. Until now the only thing keeping $37,233.28 of paid debt out of the balances was transaction_splits.settled -- a boolean that any delete-and-recreate write path resets to false, as the split modal did until commit 6add958. Losing the flag on a pre-cutover row now costs nothing: the date still excludes it. The flag matters only on or after the cutover, marking the few settled outside this app. It also makes splitting history safe to do freely. A split on a 2024 grocery shop can now describe how the expense was shared -- which is what stops it inflating spend -- without asserting a debt that was settled years ago. That was the whole reason not to split pre-2026 expenses, and it no longer applies. The bound is inclusive because transaction 2348 is itself dated 2026-01-09; an exclusive one would drop the carryover and with it the entire pre-cutover balance. Corrects one live figure: a Woolworths on 2026-01-06 was split 50/50 three days before the cutover, double-counting $7.55 against the carryover. Sonu $5,428.08 -> $5,420.53. The test fixture default moved to 2026-06-15 -- it was 2024-06-15, which is now pre-cutover and made every balance fixture read zero. That the suite caught this is the guard working.	2026-07-28 13:52:30 +10:00
siddharthd	6add958132	fix(splits): editing a split must not resurrect a settled debt ... The route replaces every split for a transaction rather than editing in place, so the recreated rows took the column default settled=false. Opening the split modal on a historical transaction and saving it therefore converted a discharged obligation into a live one, with nothing on screen saying so. That is not theoretical. 657 pre-2026 transactions now carry settled splits imported from SplitMyExpenses -- $37,233.28 of balance that the carryover (transaction 2348) already accounts for. Editing one would double-count its share against a debt that was paid years ago. Now carries settled and settled_at across the rewrite, per participant, the same way the rules revert route already does. Changing someone's percentage does not re-open the obligation: it was settled outside this app and stays settled. A participant who was not on the transaction before is a genuinely new obligation and correctly starts unsettled. rule-actions.ts was already safe here -- it upserts ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE SET share_percent, so it never touches the flag.	2026-07-28 13:40:48 +10:00
siddharthd	3339a0b9b7	chore: ignore the scripts venv ... scripts/split_csv_match.py needs psycopg2, so scripts/ now has a venv beside it. This repo deploys from its working tree, so an untracked .venv would be swept into the Docker build context.	2026-07-28 13:32:31 +10:00
siddharthd	3b9d302ce2	docs(shared): record the grouped-payment allocation ... Sonu's two "transfer" payments are split by scope, Europe first and the remainder to household, chronologically so each settles what was outstanding when it was made. Both Europe tabs now read $0.00. No schema change was needed and that is the point worth writing down: split_payments has no unique constraint on linked_transaction_id, so one bank transfer carries one row per scope and the rows re-add to the transfer -- verified, 4111 sums to $3,779.33 and 4121 to $4,794.06. Her overall balance is unchanged at $5,428.08. Allocation moves money between tabs, never between people; that invariance is the check to repeat on any future re-allocation.	2026-07-28 13:02:56 +10:00
siddharthd	4fc8eeac95	docs(shared): record the Sonu+Sunny leg as its own trip ... Trip 3, 2026-04-12 to 2026-04-28, 124 rows, $9,914.24. It was marked only by tag 5 and so was invisible to every trip figure. It reads at first like a sharing scope overlapping the group trip, because the tag's earliest row is 17 March. It is not: that is a single advance booking (Ticketmaster Nanterre), 8 more rows fall on the 12 April handover day and were already held out of Europe 2026, and the remaining 115 run 13-28 April. A clean sequential leg. Also records that grouped payments need no schema change -- split_payments has no unique constraint on linked_transaction_id, so one transfer can carry a row per scope -- and that the 23 Apr Qantas booking is the flight to Bangkok starting a solo leg, which is why it stays out of this trip.	2026-07-28 12:59:53 +10:00
siddharthd	89300450a7	docs(shared): describe what was built, not what was proposed ... The 2026-07-26 document was a proposal marked "nothing built". Everything it described as broken is now fixed, and the fix is not the one it proposed, so leaving it in place would misdescribe the system to whoever reads it next. Records what the code now does: settled as the single balance gate, settled and trip_id as orthogonal axes, settling up by recording a payment rather than flipping a flag, and the reasons duplicates are superseded rather than deleted. Keeps the loan design intact and clearly marked as still a proposal -- it was never built and nothing in this work touched it. Also records that the proposal's own recommendation not to restate history from the CSVs was overturned, and why it was wrong: it measured the value in balances, where it is nil, and missed it in spend, where it is $35,259.	2026-07-28 12:06:56 +10:00
siddharthd	b4a116c134	feat(scripts): import the matched split history as settled ... Adds --write to the matcher. Wrote 1,242 split rows across 657 transactions. Imported settled, and that is the whole design. These obligations were discharged years ago on a platform we no longer run, and their residual is already carried by transaction 2348. Writing them unsettled would re-open roughly $40k of debts that were paid. ACTIVE_OBLIGATION keeps settled splits out of every owed figure while myShare/mySplitOf still count them, which is exactly the asymmetry this needs: the import exists to correct historical SPEND, not to move a balance. Effect: $35,259 leaves my historical spend -- $13,088 in 2024, $22,117 in 2025 -- because a $200 grocery shop that was always half hers no longer reads as $200 of mine. Balances are byte-identical before and after (Molina -1226.72/145, Sonu 5428.08/419), which is the assertion that matters. Shares are written as the CSV computed them, so a 50/50 row can land as 50.01/49.99. That is faithful rather than tidy; no transaction exceeds 100%. Rehearsed on the 37-row Rome file first (24 rows) and verified before the full run -- both the balances and one split read back through the API.	2026-07-28 12:02:57 +10:00
siddharthd	c9b000a428	feat(scripts): dry-run matcher for the SplitMyExpenses history ... Matches the five CSV exports against transactions already in the ledger and reports what it would do. Writes nothing -- importing is a separate step, and rehearsing it first is what catches the defects that tests do not. What it found, and why the number is what it is: 676 of 1,536 shareable rows match (44%). The ceiling is ledger coverage, not matcher quality. The CSVs describe 678 shared expenses in 2024 alone; the ledger holds 591 rows for the whole of that year, 3 to 72 a month, which is far less than a household actually spends. Most 2024 CSV rows have no transaction to attach a split to and never will. South Korea April 2024 matches 4 of 158 for that reason. Three decisions are encoded deliberately: - Date format is decided per FILE, not per row. The household export writes D/M/YYYY and the four trip exports write ISO, and 474 rows parse validly under both readings -- per-row guessing silently swaps January and February for some rows and not others. - A person's column is their net balance impact, not their share. The payer is whoever is positive; the other's share is |their negative| / cost. So a +cost/-cost row means the other party owes 100%, not that the expense was unshared -- the reading that would fake an arrangement change. - Matching is one-to-one, best pair first. The NZ trip has two identical $10.16 Uber rows against three ledger rows and four PayMyPark rows in the same shape; without this a ledger row is claimed repeatedly and the second CSV row looks matched while being unrepresented.	2026-07-28 12:00:18 +10:00
siddharthd	dbfbd5196d	fix(transactions): supersede rows imported twice instead of deleting them ... Statements 107, 142 and 143 bill overlapping periods on one ANZ account, so 31 transactions -- $42,040.68 -- are in the ledger twice. They are marked superseded, not deleted. Every child of transactions is ON DELETE CASCADE (splits, tags, overrides, expense_metadata, order_reviews), so deleting "the duplicate" destroys whatever curation sits on it, and which member of a pair holds that curation is an accident of import order: here 1 pair carries splits and 6 carry overrides, all on the surviving side, but nothing guarantees that. Superseding keeps the row, keeps its children, and makes a mistake one UPDATE to undo rather than a restore from backup. reconciled_with_id could not be reused. Its predicate is scoped to statement_id IS NULL on purpose -- a statement line pointing at something else is the survivor, not the duplicate -- and here both rows are statement lines. The exclusion goes into EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE rather than into a new fragment, so every query already asking "count each purchase once" gets it without being edited. The trip cost queries did not use that fragment at all and now do; verified a no-op on current data (0 trip-tagged rows are either reconciled sources or duplicates), but they were one import away from double-counting. Most of the $42k is transfers and investments, which spend already excludes. The damage was elsewhere: duplicated rows in the list, and rules re-splitting a duplicate -- txn 3807 is one of these 31 and was a candidate for splitting earlier today. Balances are unchanged: no duplicate carried a split.	2026-07-28 11:54:25 +10:00
siddharthd	d5589b2980	feat(statements): flag billing periods that overlap another statement ... An account cannot be billed twice for the same day, so an overlap means those transactions are in the ledger twice. ANZ statements 107 and 143 overlap by 118 days and put roughly $42,000 of duplicate rows in; nothing anywhere said so. Two details decide whether this catches the real case: - Account numbers compare with non-digits stripped. The duplicate got in because the existing key compared raw text and ANZ wrote the same account as 408556264 on one statement and 4085-56264 on the other. - The range is half-open. These statements are issued back-to-back with one period ending the day the next starts, so inclusive bounds flagged 5 pairs of which 3 were consecutive and fine. Half-open leaves exactly the 2 real ones. NULL bounds are excluded rather than handed to daterange, where NULL means unbounded and an undated statement would overlap all of history. Detection only. It does not refuse the import or touch the duplicate rows -- cleaning those is separate, and must supersede rather than delete because every child of transactions is ON DELETE CASCADE and the curation sits on the duplicate side. Both subtleties have a test, and both fail if you undo them.	2026-07-28 11:46:45 +10:00
siddharthd	7a1acc32a9	feat(trips): say which direction a trip balance points ... A participant who has overpaid a trip showed as "$-816.16" under a column headed "Outstanding on this trip". A negative outstanding reads as a bug rather than as "they are ahead", so the sign is now spelled out: magnitude plus one of all square / owes you / ahead — you owe them, coloured the same way Shared colours the same three states. Also corrects the footer, which had gone stale and was now simply false. It said settlement could not be computed per trip because payments carried no trip attribution. Migration 0022 added split_payments.trip_id and the figures above it have been net of trip-scoped payments since. What a reader needs to know is the opposite of what it said: household-tab payments are the ones NOT counted here.	2026-07-28 11:39:11 +10:00
siddharthd	e92fcb709f	docs(trips): say whose money the trip total counts ... Total Spend is every payer's trip-tagged spending; the split figures directly below it are scoped to the owner. Two lenses on one screen read as one unless the card says which it is. The number is unchanged and deliberate -- a trip cost what the group put into it -- so this is a label, not a fix.	2026-07-28 11:30:37 +10:00
siddharthd	8c21893cc2	fix(trips): money that came back is not what the trip cost ... Every trip figure filtered on transaction_type IN ('debit','fee','interest'), which drops refunds and credits outright. A partly-refunded booking therefore read at its full price and the refund subtracted nothing, anywhere: the headline total_spend, the category breakdown, the daily chart, top merchants and the tag breakdown were all gross. This is the same defect the general analytics fixed once already, which is why NET_SPEND_ROWS and SPEND_SIGNED exist -- a refunded Expedia purchase read as $2,888.92 of spend until they did. Trip analytics never adopted them. Doing so now costs one predicate and one expression per query. getTrips/getTripById needed the trips alias moved to `tr`: the fragments assume `t` is `transactions`, and hand-inlining a copy rather than renaming is exactly how the reconciled-row exclusion drifted out of the analytics routes before. On Europe 2026 this is $821.12 -- a LuxuryEscapes booking with two part-credits against it, and a FreeNow hold adjustment. Fully cancelled bookings are a different case and are handled by untagging both legs from the trip by hand, because a trip never incurred a cost it cancelled. No balance moves: the owed query already excludes credits and a refund carries no split. There is a test asserting exactly that, and it passes with or without this change -- it is a guard, not a proof. The three that do prove it fail without it.	2026-07-28 11:25:03 +10:00
siddharthd	4fcb135805	fix(trips): a trip figure must only count what the owner is owed ... The per-trip owed number shipped in 689fadc counted every split on every trip transaction regardless of who paid, so it silently mixed debts owed to different people under one label. On Europe 2026 that meant Molina "owed" $21,572.12, of which $1,605.49 was her share of rows Sonu paid for — a real debt, but between the other two participants, and one they had already settled directly (split_payments id 5, Molina -> Sonu, exactly $1,605.49). A participant's own share of a row they themselves paid for was in there too, which is nobody's debt at all. Both sides needed scoping, not just one: the owed side to rows this owner paid for, and the paid side to payments made to this owner. Scoping only the first would have let a Molina -> Sonu payment reduce what Molina owes the owner. The corrected figures reproduce a number derived independently, months of data apart: Molina now reads -$816.16 on Europe, matching her known overpayment to the cent ($19,966.63 of splits against $20,782.79 paid). Sonu goes from $8,793.10 to $1,084.61, and the owner correctly disappears from a list of people who owe the owner. Found by checking a household total against what the app had been showing all along — the query was gross, gave a number about twice the real one, and I had quoted it as "owed". Worth stating plainly: the defect was not in the number the app displayed, it was in the number I computed to explain it.	2026-07-27 23:40:58 +10:00
siddharthd	ff0629462c	fix(ci): generate the Prisma client before running tests ... The pipeline has been red on every run since at least ae0c34f. npm ci installs dependencies but the Prisma client is generated into src/generated/prisma, which is gitignored — so a fresh CI checkout has no client and anything importing src/lib/db.ts fails with 'Cannot find package @/generated/prisma/client' before a single assertion runs. prisma generate reads only the schema, so it needs no database and no secrets. Worth noting why this went unnoticed for a dozen commits: a pipeline that is always red carries no signal, so it stopped being read.	2026-07-27 23:23:32 +10:00
siddharthd	ae23b03d5d	fix(trips): carry the currency and reconcile rules into the trip figure ... a4ab543 landed six hours ago and this branch rewrote one of the queries it had just fixed, quietly dropping both of its guarantees. That commit made EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE "one fragment both sides import" because an inlined copy is how the reconciled-row exclusion drifted out of the analytics routes and double-counted 48 rows / $4,474.79. The trip owed query here had hand-inlined its own copy — the fragment assumes the alias `t` and this query used `tx`, so the path of least resistance was to re-create exactly the divergence that was being removed. Aliased to `t` so the fragments apply directly. The same commit made balances count rows whose AUD value is unknown rather than netting a foreign figure against AUD ones. The trip figure had no equivalent — on the query where it matters most, because a trip is where foreign rows actually live. A Europe total silently mixing EUR into AUD is the whole failure that fix was written to prevent. The column header still read "Share of this trip" while the number is now net of payments, which is the same class of drift a4ab543 set out to fix. It reads "Outstanding on this trip", carries the approx/unconverted caveat the Shared cards use, and greys a settled zero.	2026-07-27 23:15:28 +10:00
siddharthd	689fadc8b9	feat(shared): give a payment a tab to settle ... A payment has only ever recorded from, to, amount and date. That is why the per-trip owed figure did not exist — getTripAnalytics said so where the number should have been: "split_payments carries no trip attribution, so a payment cannot be assigned to a trip. Settlement is a property of the whole relationship." Every trip therefore read 100% unsettled, including trips paid in full. It is also why the Shared page silently drops payments under a tag filter. With one global pool there was nothing honest to subtract, so it showed gross splits under the same label. A tag is a view; a scope is a ledger. The scope is a trip, not a new settlement_contexts table. trips already has owner_id, dates and archived, and transaction_overrides.trip_id already decides membership. A second grouping beside it would be two unsynchronised scopes over the same rows, with no invariant saying which governs. NULL means the ongoing household tab, which never closes. settled answers a different question and the two must not be collapsed: trip_id is which tab, settled is whether the obligation is still live. Critically, a live obligation is NOT settled by flipping the flag — it is settled by recording the payment, and the balance nets to zero on its own. Doing both would subtract the settlement twice. So settled is written only by the historical import, for repayments made on a platform we no longer run, and there is deliberately no "mark settled" action. Both owed figures now exclude settled splits and the trip figure nets its own payments. Spend analytics (myShare/mySplitOf) deliberately still count settled rows: my half of a 2025 grocery shop is my spend whether or not the other half was ever repaid, and filtering them would re-inflate exactly the figures importing settled history exists to correct. Also drops /api/participants/[id]/balance. It had no consumers, no owner scoping, no debit/credit signs and no EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE — a fourth balance implementation that disagreed with the others and would have imported three bugs if anything had aligned to it. getTripAnalytics had no test at all. It has five now, including the one that matters: a household payment must not make a trip look paid. Verified by mutation — neutering the settled filter fails three, and dropping the trip filter on payments fails that one.	2026-07-27 23:12:05 +10:00
siddharthd	a4ab543a6c	fix(analytics): make the displayed numbers mean what they say ... Six metric-integrity defects from the UI/IA review, plus two found while verifying the review's own claims against the code. The reconciled-row exclusion existed only in queries.ts. Every analytics route counted the superseded manual rows as spend — 48 rows, $4,474.79 of double count, invisible precisely because the transaction list looked right. It is now one fragment both sides import. The spend-pace chart computed its own totals in the browser: gross amounts, debits only, no personal share, no refunds, fees, interest or itemised loan repayments. On live data it ended July at $4,747.31 under a headline reading $3,597.10 — and its own baseline line was drawn from the split-adjusted monthly totals, so the two series in one chart disagreed with each other. Both now come from /api/analytics/daily, built from the same fragments as the headline. Fees aggregated every statement ever imported with no date filter, under a heading with no period, so a lifetime figure read as a current one and grew forever. Now bounded, labelled, and selectable. Comparisons no longer measure a month in progress against complete ones: the in-progress month is out of every baseline, and a selected current month is compared through the same day. Two the review did not catch: - Every analytics window was a day early. toISOString() on a local-midnight Date converts backwards through UTC. Surfaced only once fees started reporting the range it had used. - /monthly rounded per category, /daily per category-day, so the pace chart ended a few cents off the headline above it. Shared currency needed amending rather than applying. Reading s.currency would have labelled every order row AUD, since an order receipt has no statement and carries its own currency — the opposite convention from a foreign charge on an AUD statement, where amount IS AUD. NATIVE_CURRENCY's COALESCE order keeps the two apart. Balances also now count rows whose AUD value is genuinely unknown instead of netting a foreign figure against AUD ones. Latent today: no foreign transaction is currently split. Tag-filtered balance cards no longer claim "owes you". With a filter on, payments are deliberately not subtracted, so the figure is a split total and settling against it would record a payment for a debt that never was. Split-coverage warnings deliberately omitted (user decision).	2026-07-27 17:10:27 +10:00
siddharthd	5ee5ee24cf	feat(orders): expand a row to see the receipt it came from ... Enrichment is the point of the ingestion pipeline (DECISIONS ING-8) — a bank statement gives a date, an amount and a mangled descriptor, and everything that makes a transaction understandable arrives by email. It was all reachable only by opening the edit modal, which is a strange place to look for "what was in this order". Rows with a receipt behind them get a disclosure arrow in the description cell; clicking expands an inline panel with the line items, the pick-up and drop-off stops, the card tail and the provider's reference. Several rows can be open at once — the point is comparing orders without losing your place. The arrow appears only where `order_platform` is set. Putting one on every transaction would promise detail that mostly does not exist. OrderDetails moves out of edit-transaction-modal.tsx into its own component so both surfaces render the same thing; `bare` drops the modal's top border when it sits in a table row.	2026-07-27 11:52:33 +10:00
siddharthd	3bb67f370d	feat(orders): show where an Uber trip went, in the list ... Five rows all reading "Order - Uber Trip" are indistinguishable — the list gives you a date and an amount and nothing to tell one ride from another (user, 2026-07-27). Where the trip went is exactly what separates them, and it was already stored on expense_metadata.route since this morning; nothing in the list read it. getTransactions now joins the receipt (both directions — transaction_id OR matched_transaction_id, since a card-settled order points at the statement line instead) and the description cell renders "Terminal 2, Melbourne Airport (MEL) → 19 Lady Penrhyn Dr" in the same italic sub-line notes use. Two deliberate limits: - **A note the user wrote always wins.** This only fills an empty sub-line; it never occupies the notes field, which is theirs. - **Deliveries are excluded.** Their merchant already identifies them, so the restaurant's street address would be clutter on every food order. Gated on platform = 'uber'. The summary keeps the first two comma-segments of each address — a truncation, not a guess about geography. Uber puts the venue or street first, which is the identifying part; the full stops with their times stay in the title attribute.	2026-07-27 11:43:55 +10:00
siddharthd	6161ddc9de	fix(orders): don't restate a platform the merchant already names ... Trip rows read "Order - Uber Trip (Uber)". The suffix exists so you can tell where to go and look; when the merchant is literally "Uber Trip" it says nothing. What identifies a trip is its two addresses, and those are in the Order details panel. Existing rows updated in prod.	2026-07-27 11:33:37 +10:00
siddharthd	c656f5d26b	feat(orders): read Uber trips, and reject the charge summary that duplicates them ... Local rides are paid with credits (only overseas ones go on a card), so trips belong to this slice and were simply never fetched — the Graph query searched "order with Uber", the Eats subject. Captured 15 real messages from the mailbox via a dry-run before touching anything, which found two defects that no amount of reasoning about the template would have: **Uber sends two mails per trip.** A "charge summary" when the ride ends, then the real receipt when payment settles — same subject, same total. The summary carries no tripReference, so order_reference fell back to `msg:<message-id>` and I7 could not dedupe it against the receipt that follows. Every trip would have been recorded twice. It says so itself ("This is not a payment receipt ... You will receive a trip receipt when the payment is processed"), so it is now a NotAReceiptError — 200 and silent, like every other expected non-receipt. **Trip receipts label neither end of the journey.** Delivery receipts write "1:20 pm - Pick-up"; trips print the time alone. The split regex put the time into `label` and left `time` null. Time is now read properly, and a two-stop trip is labelled Pick-up/Drop-off positionally — only where the receipt was silent, so a template that does label its stops keeps its own wording. Verified against all 15 captured messages: 7 trips recorded, 5 charge summaries and 3 promotions skipped, 0 failures, no duplicate references. Two of the seven are AUD credits-funded ($84.78 + $47.97) and would become transactions; the five NZD ones are card-settled and correctly create provenance only (I5). Fixtures ut-00 (local credits trip), ut-01 (overseas card trip) and ut-summary (the charge summary) are captured mail, not written by hand.	2026-07-27 11:21:13 +10:00
siddharthd	4febf38292	test(orders): clean statement fixtures before ingest, not after ... These tests insert a Westpac statement and a `DD *DOORDASH ...` charge, and only removed them at the end of the test — so they survived into the next run, where `reconcileCardLeg` could match one at ingest time and resolve an order that was meant to park `awaiting_card_statement`. That is a real ordering bug in the fixtures regardless. It is my best explanation for the intermittent failure in "parks an unresolvable split", but I could not reproduce it: seeding the exact leftover row and running the old code passed anyway. So this is hygiene with a plausible mechanism, not a confirmed fix — if that test fails again, this was not the cause.	2026-07-27 11:01:23 +10:00
siddharthd	b6cd62f7b5	feat(orders): show the receipt in the transaction detail panel ... `expense_metadata` has held the itemised receipt since ingestion started and nothing in the UI ever read it. A transaction that came from a DoorDash or Uber Eats receipt showed a merchant and an amount, with the item list and the delivery addresses sitting unread in the row behind it (user, 2026-07-27). Adds GET /api/transactions/[id]/order and an "Order details" section in the edit modal: line items with their options, pick-up/delivery stops with times and addresses, the card tail when one was involved, and the provider's own order reference. Two details that matter: - The lookup resolves from **both** sides — `transaction_id` OR `matched_transaction_id`. A card-settled order creates no transaction of its own (I5); the receipt points at the statement line instead. Matching only on transaction_id would have left the panel blank on exactly the card-paid orders, which are the ones whose detail is hardest to find elsewhere. - An empty item list says so in words rather than rendering nothing. Uber itemises groceries but not restaurant orders, and orders ingested before the Uber item parser existed have none either — a blank section reads as a bug when it is usually the receipt. Read-only. This is what a provider sent; editing it would make provenance mean nothing.	2026-07-27 10:55:57 +10:00
siddharthd	df4b875b82	feat(orders): make an ingested order legible in the transactions view ... Four things the view could not tell you, all from reading the rows (user, 2026-07-27). **Which platform.** The parser has always known — it has to, to read the template — and then discarded it. "Order - Burger Corner" gives no way to know whether to open DoorDash or Uber Eats for the detail, and restaurants exist on both. Now stored on expense_metadata and named in the description: "Order - Burger Corner (Uber Eats)". Migration 0021 recovers it for the 101 backfilled rows from the order_reference shape — DoorDash receipts carry no id of their own so ingestion synthesises `msg:<message-id>`, Uber carries a real trip UUID, which makes the discriminator exact. **Bank said "Manual".** That label is derived, not stored, and "Manual" reads as "hand-entered, still awaiting a card line to match". A gift-card order has no card line coming, ever. It now reads "Gift Card", and — the part that actually mattered — credits joins cash in needsCardMatch(), so these stop sitting in the pending-reconciliation queue. All 81 were queued against a match that could not exist. **Uber line items were never parsed.** 67 of 101 orders had none. Uber itemises groceries but not restaurant orders, so some of that is genuine; the rest was simply unread. Its markup is better than DoorDash's — every cell carries a data-testid with the item's uuid, so qty/title/amount bind by id rather than by column position. Sold-out items (0.00) are kept: they are why a total is lower than what was ordered. **Uber prints pick-up and delivery addresses on every receipt** and they were thrown away. Captured as `route` [{label, time, address}], de-duplicated because the template renders the whole block twice for narrow screens. Wording is kept as printed ("Pick-up" on some receipts, "Pickup" on others) rather than normalised, so a template change stays visible. This is the same block a *trip* receipt uses for start and destination — rides are not ingested today, but the reader will not need changing when they are. Also stores source_email_subject/from, which order ingestion had left null on columns that already existed. Verified against the captured corpus: route on all 6 Uber fixtures, 5/5 items on the GLOMARK grocery receipt including the sold-out one. Production data updated by smarthome:docker/scripts/order-presentation-2026-07-27.sql (81 descriptions, `backfill` tag, re-run clean). `route` and Uber line items are parsed from here on only — recovering them for already-ingested orders means re-reading the mail, which I7 idempotency refuses by design.	2026-07-27 10:51:30 +10:00
siddharthd	ae0c34fce7	fix(orders): two defects the backfill exposed that tests could not ... Both were found by looking at the data after the live backfill, not by the suite — 105 tests were green while 85 rows were invisible and 4 were double counted. owner_id was NULL on every ingested order. Analytics scope on COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id), and an ingested order carries no statement, so the coalesce resolved to NULL and matched no owner. The rows existed in `transactions` and appeared in no view in the app. Ingestion now sets DEFAULT_OWNER_ID, and a regression test asserts the row survives the same COALESCE scoping the UI uses. [Family] orders are card-settled, not credits-funded. Their receipts name the payer ("Payments Siddharth LKR 3,783.20") and no instrument, which an earlier version read as credits. The card statement carries all four of them (CBA ...3893, exact foreign_currency_amount matches), so creating a transaction duplicated spend already recorded — the double-count I5 exists to prevent. They now record provenance only; the statement line is the transaction and is what carries the `family` tag that keeps them out of budgets. Production data corrected separately by smarthome:docker/scripts/fix-order-backfill-2026-07-27.sql. Also: reconciliation tests no longer assert global row counts. reconcilePendingOrders() scans every pending row, so leftovers from other files moved the totals — the source of an intermittent failure that only appeared on the first run after a source edit.	2026-07-27 10:41:10 +10:00
siddharthd	5db42f086f	fix(orders): match the card leg by masking, not by card brand ... Backfill dry-run over 130 real messages surfaced one 422: 'payments sum to 1.17 but receipt states 16.50'. The receipt is a mixed Uber payment — Uber Cash $1.17 + Westpac ••••8032 $15.33 — and the card regex only matched Visa|MasterCard|American Express|Amex, so an issuer-named leg was dropped entirely. validateOrderTotals correctly refused it rather than recording $1.17 as the cost of a $16.50 order. Anchors on the ••••NNNN masking instead, which also covers the form already seen in the corpus ('Mastercard ••••3893 (CBA Ultimate) CHF 51.23'). Fixture and regression test added. Also repoints .env.test at the current postgres-personal container IP and documents why: the container publishes no host port, so the address changes on every recreate and the whole integration suite fails with connection errors until it is refreshed.	2026-07-27 01:39:42 +10:00
siddharthd	1103397397	fix(orders): three defects found reviewing my own branch ... None of these were caught by 105 green tests, because the code they live in was barely tested and the HTTP path was not tested at all. 1. reconcilePendingOrders hardcoded category 'dining', so any order resolved through the deferred path booked as dining regardless of merchant — a Woolworths grocery order that parks and later reconciles was misfiled. That reintroduced, through the back door, exactly the misfiling resolveCategory() exists to prevent. Now calls it. 2. reconcileCardLeg never marked a statement line as consumed, so two orders on the same card inside the +/-4 day window both bound to the same charge and each booked its own credits remainder — double-counting spend. At 10-15 orders a month on one card that is not a corner case. Migration 0020 adds matched_transaction_id with a unique index; the matcher now excludes lines already claimed. 3. The ingest API returned HTTP 200 for every parse failure, and the Slack alert fires only on non-200. So the single most likely production failure — a provider template change breaking every order at once — was completely silent. Split into NotAReceiptError (promotions, delivery updates, refund and adjustment notices: 200, silent, expected traffic) and OrderParseError (it IS a receipt and would not parse: 422, alerts). Also: order_reference now anchors on Uber's own tripReference cell rather than 'first UUID in the document'. I had claimed to verify that the first UUID was always the order UUID; that check compared against zero samples and was vacuous. tripReference is present in all 29 captured receipts and, for ue-00, equals the UUID the PDF redirect resolves to. The positional fallback remains but only flags when there is genuine ambiguity. Adds the API route's first tests — auth gate and error taxonomy — plus anchoring regressions. 63 unit + 53 integration green on five consecutive runs; corpus holds at 63/65.	2026-07-27 01:15:39 +10:00
siddharthd	a9e251d969	feat(orders): amendments, family imports, and the ingest API ... Closes the three gaps left after the parser rebuild. Refund amendments. ue-05 is a real refund: 'Previous total $49.94 / Refund -$4.21 / New Total $45.73'. Uber reuses the order UUID across the receipt and the amendment, so the two can be matched. The transaction is reduced in place rather than offset with a second row — the order is one event whose cost changed, and a compensating row would misreport both the meal count and the merchant's spend. When the original was never ingested, nothing is invented. [Family] orders now import instead of parking. Their payment line names the payer, not an instrument ('Payments Siddharth LKR 3,783.20'), so no split is recoverable and there is no card leg to reconcile against — they would have sat pending forever, which fails the actual requirement to import and tag them. Treated as credits, flagged as an assumption. Safe because the family tag removes them from every budget regardless of instrument, and the LKR amount is preserved with amount_aud left NULL rather than asserting an FX rate. Ingest API. n8n now POSTs each message to /api/orders/ingest instead of parsing in a Code node — the n8n sandbox has no require or fs, so a parser there cannot be tested against the fixture corpus, which is the one thing that makes this parser trustworthy. Auth is a shared secret, since machine callers have no Traefik session header. Rejections return 422 and record nothing. 60 unit + 45 integration green on three consecutive runs; 63/65 corpus holds.	2026-07-27 00:48:20 +10:00
siddharthd	c82a22767f	feat(orders): wire the real parser in, defer card reconciliation ... Ingestion now runs on the rebuilt parser. Three substantive changes. Deferred card reconciliation. A 'MasterCard 8032 and/or credits' receipt never states the split, but the card leg lands on the statement — Subway's $29.08 order shows $13.06 on 8032, so $16.02 was credits. For a live order that statement is weeks away, so the split cannot be settled at ingest time. Such orders are now parked with provenance and no transaction, and reconcilePendingOrders() resolves them once the statement arrives. Backfill takes the same path and resolves immediately. Migration 0019 adds the columns that make an order resumable; applied to personal_test only, prod untouched. Payment detection bug, found by the new tests: the old regex delimited the 'Paid with' line on a double space, which whitespace collapsing removes. Every card and mixed receipt fell through to the credits branch — the Woolworths receipt booked $60.93 of credits spend that never happened. Category resolution reversed deliberately. Correction 1 said never default to dining; the implementation of that sent everything unrecognised to 'other', and knowing six merchants meant Carl's Jr, Taco Bell, Chilli India, Oporto, Schnitz and Souvlaki GR all landed there. Grocers are an enumerable set and restaurants are not, so match groceries explicitly and let the residual be dining. Tests rebuilt on real captured receipts; the synthetic fixtures are deleted. 60 unit + 41 integration green on three consecutive runs.	2026-07-26 22:43:10 +10:00
siddharthd	33db7d05ef	feat(orders): rebuild the receipt parser against real captured email ... The previous parser was written against synthetic fixtures shaped to match the code. It invented a table layout DoorDash does not send, generated order_reference from Math.random(), read the order date from a 'Date:' string present in no real message, and detected [Family] by searching the body for the substring 'family'. Its tests passed because the fixtures were built to satisfy it. Against 36 real DoorDash and 29 real Uber Eats receipts it does not work. Rebuilt from the real corpus. 63 of 65 now parse and validate; the 2 rejected are correctly rejected — one is an order-adjustment notice and one a refund, neither of which is a receipt. Corrects an inherited diagnosis: the Mad Mex 'Discounts -$24.09' was recorded as an HTML-flattening artefact masking a 'true discount of $9.45'. Parsing the table cells structurally returns the same figures and no $9.45 exists anywhere in the message — DoorDash genuinely prints a Discounts line that equals subtotal plus service fee, and the components fail to reconcile on 32 of 36 receipts. So the breakdown is stored as provenance and never gated on; validation instead cross-checks the two independently stated totals and the payment line, which is the number that becomes money. Real-world cases the corpus forced, none of which were in the spec: [Family] orders are LKR purchases for family in Sri Lanka (reading them as dollars inflates ~200x), Swiss orders arrive in CHF, grocery 'Final receipt' mails carry no Total Charged row, and a declined payment is printed alongside the successful retry and must be skipped or it records money that never moved. order_reference now comes from the Uber order UUID embedded in the body, or the provider message id where DoorDash supplies no order id at all — never random, so re-ingestion is genuinely idempotent.	2026-07-26 22:25:26 +10:00
siddharthd	6d3b6e1a9d	feat(orders): withdraw the ShopBack transfer guard ... Tests 12 & 13 asserted that every 'ShopBack Gift Cards' row becomes a transfer. Resolved against the ShopBack purchase emails, 3 of the 14 matching rows are Airbnb, 1 Shell, 1 Amazon — the bank descriptor's trailing token is a sequence counter, not a brand code, so the description cannot identify what was bought. Only $313.66 of $3,411.16 was ever reclassifiable. Withdrawn rather than narrowed: making it safe needs ShopBack purchase-email ingestion, brand resolution and an approval gate, to correctly handle 2 transactions in 20 months. Those two rows get handled by hand.	2026-07-26 22:09:31 +10:00
siddharthd	9f168cf4c8	test(orders): stop integration files racing on the shared test database ... The integration suite shares one personal_test database and helpers.resetDB() TRUNCATEs it with CASCADE, which reaches expense_metadata via the transactions FK. With file parallelism on, queries.test.ts and participants.test.ts were truncating rows out from under order-ingestion.test.ts mid-test, so a different set of assertions failed on every run — including I6 (credits), I7 (idempotency) and I11 ([Family]), the three invariants the suite exists to prove. Serialise the files. Suite was reported 31/31 green; observed 29/31 then 28/31 on consecutive runs. Now 31/31 on three consecutive runs.	2026-07-26 19:50:21 +10:00
siddharthd	775e5cc08f	feat(orders): add Uber Eats and Uber Rides support, fare parsing, and category resolution	2026-07-26 19:00:59 +10:00
siddharthd	bbb90238e4	feat(orders): implement order ingestion pipeline, review ratings schema, and [Family] exclusion	2026-07-26 18:52:34 +10:00