ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 40s
CLAUDE.md gains the traps a new session would otherwise re-discover: - Rules: a zero-condition rule matches everything (rule 43 would split all ~3,700 transactions); preview-then-apply-by-id is the safe pattern and why it beats auto-applying on ingestion; how run provenance works. - Shared expenses: transaction_splits.settled is dead data; getParticipantBalances is correct and must not be 'fixed'; settlement cannot be attributed per trip. - The shared loan: separate ledger, fixed 50% with a tracked receivable, why the share must not be derived from actual payments, and why interest stays as spend. - Extraction: balance assertions are the check that works, do not derive opening_balance or add a totals assertion (both would be tautological), Gemini invents summary fields it was not given, empty statements must not throw, FX is per-date, and CSV comparisons need millisecond ordering. The design doc records Phase 0 as done - including that the original Phase 0 plan was wrong, since reading the code first is what prevented breaking a working balance page. Known Gaps lists what is open: the unbuilt phases, 11 failing assertions, the uncategorised Up rows, and the CSVs sitting in 030490e's history.