siddharthd
b82c4570bd
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 45s
"We should not be importing from Frollo what we already have from statements" (owner). The amount+direction guard could not deliver that, because the two sources decompose the same event differently: Frollo bundles the Wise fee into the transfer (10001.13) where the statement itemises it (10000.00 + 1.13). So 38 Wise USD rows passed the amount guard as new while being the same money, and were the reason the transactions view showed a USD figure where every neighbouring row showed AUD. A statement's billing_end_date is a hard watermark: everything on that account up to that date is already in the ledger, itemised and converted. Guard 1 now drops any feed row at or before its account's newest statement. Guard 2 (amount + direction) stays as the net for accounts that have no statement at all. Note this is the coverage test the first import needed and got wrong. That one asked whether a row's date fell inside a statement's min-max window, which for periods spanning 182 to 460 days swallows a year and answers nothing. The watermark asks a question that has an answer: up to what date is this account complete? Matching is on last4, verified against the live statement set — the eight in-scope accounts with statements each map to one bank, no cross-bank collision. The watermarks are printed by the CLI so a wrong boundary is visible rather than inferred from a row count. Re-imported from empty: 425 covered by statement, 15 amount twins, 110 inserted. Exactly one row now carries a foreign currency with no AUD figure — the 2026-08-12 HDR salary, which is the genuinely-new pre-statement row this feed exists for. Was 39.