The ledger already knew we had ordered from a place; it did not know the
food was bad. Orders got repeated from places we disliked because nobody
remembered by the time the next one went in. That is what the receipt
ingestion was for (ING-9) and the last piece was missing: order_reviews
existed as a table with no API, no UI and no writes.
Four levels, not three. "Loved" and "liked" are both "would order again"
but only one is worth a detour, and "ok" is not a recommendation.
A verdict belongs to a person, not to an order. A shared meal produces
two opinions and they routinely disagree — that disagreement is the
useful part, and the old UNIQUE on transaction_id alone could not hold
it. Now UNIQUE (transaction_id, participant_id), and the default is the
signed-in user rather than the owner: Sonu authenticates through the same
Traefik OAuth as participant 4, so an owner default would have filed her
verdict under his name.
Per-item opinions key on the item DESCRIPTION, not its index. An index is
meaningless across orders; "the Pad Thai here is good" is the signal that
has to survive into the next order from the same merchant. Only the two
poles are offered — a per-item "ok" answers neither of the questions you
ask at order time.
Sharing is recorded as a real 50/50 split, not a decorative flag. The
split already IS the record that an order was shared, and two records of
one fact drift apart.
An ABSENT item_verdicts means "leave them alone"; an empty array clears
them. Without that distinction a note-only save silently wipes every
per-item opinion — the same shape as the bug that reset `settled` on
split rewrites, and just as invisible on screen. Mutation-tested: making
keepItems a no-op fails exactly one test.
mockDbWithPool gained queryRow. Omitting an export from the mock makes it
undefined at the call site, which fails as "not a function" and reads
like a code bug rather than a test-harness gap.
Nothing dated before 2026-01-09 can be owed, because carryover transaction 2348
already carries the entire pre-cutover balance as a single figure. ACTIVE_OBLIGATION
now says so directly.
This inverts which mechanism is load-bearing, and that is the point. Until now
the only thing keeping $37,233.28 of paid debt out of the balances was
transaction_splits.settled -- a boolean that any delete-and-recreate write path
resets to false, as the split modal did until commit 6add958. Losing the flag on
a pre-cutover row now costs nothing: the date still excludes it. The flag matters
only on or after the cutover, marking the few settled outside this app.
It also makes splitting history safe to do freely. A split on a 2024 grocery
shop can now describe how the expense was shared -- which is what stops it
inflating spend -- without asserting a debt that was settled years ago. That was
the whole reason not to split pre-2026 expenses, and it no longer applies.
The bound is inclusive because transaction 2348 is itself dated 2026-01-09; an
exclusive one would drop the carryover and with it the entire pre-cutover
balance.
Corrects one live figure: a Woolworths on 2026-01-06 was split 50/50 three days
before the cutover, double-counting $7.55 against the carryover. Sonu
$5,428.08 -> $5,420.53.
The test fixture default moved to 2026-06-15 -- it was 2024-06-15, which is now
pre-cutover and made every balance fixture read zero. That the suite caught this
is the guard working.
Statements 107, 142 and 143 bill overlapping periods on one ANZ account, so 31
transactions -- $42,040.68 -- are in the ledger twice.
They are marked superseded, not deleted. Every child of transactions is ON
DELETE CASCADE (splits, tags, overrides, expense_metadata, order_reviews), so
deleting "the duplicate" destroys whatever curation sits on it, and which
member of a pair holds that curation is an accident of import order: here 1
pair carries splits and 6 carry overrides, all on the surviving side, but
nothing guarantees that. Superseding keeps the row, keeps its children, and
makes a mistake one UPDATE to undo rather than a restore from backup.
reconciled_with_id could not be reused. Its predicate is scoped to
statement_id IS NULL on purpose -- a statement line pointing at something else
is the survivor, not the duplicate -- and here both rows are statement lines.
The exclusion goes into EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE rather than into a new
fragment, so every query already asking "count each purchase once" gets it
without being edited. The trip cost queries did not use that fragment at all
and now do; verified a no-op on current data (0 trip-tagged rows are either
reconciled sources or duplicates), but they were one import away from
double-counting.
Most of the $42k is transfers and investments, which spend already excludes.
The damage was elsewhere: duplicated rows in the list, and rules re-splitting a
duplicate -- txn 3807 is one of these 31 and was a candidate for splitting
earlier today.
Balances are unchanged: no duplicate carried a split.
An account cannot be billed twice for the same day, so an overlap means those
transactions are in the ledger twice. ANZ statements 107 and 143 overlap by 118
days and put roughly $42,000 of duplicate rows in; nothing anywhere said so.
Two details decide whether this catches the real case:
- Account numbers compare with non-digits stripped. The duplicate got in
because the existing key compared raw text and ANZ wrote the same account
as 408556264 on one statement and 4085-56264 on the other.
- The range is half-open. These statements are issued back-to-back with one
period ending the day the next starts, so inclusive bounds flagged 5 pairs
of which 3 were consecutive and fine. Half-open leaves exactly the 2 real
ones.
NULL bounds are excluded rather than handed to daterange, where NULL means
unbounded and an undated statement would overlap all of history.
Detection only. It does not refuse the import or touch the duplicate rows --
cleaning those is separate, and must supersede rather than delete because every
child of transactions is ON DELETE CASCADE and the curation sits on the
duplicate side.
Both subtleties have a test, and both fail if you undo them.
Every trip figure filtered on transaction_type IN ('debit','fee','interest'),
which drops refunds and credits outright. A partly-refunded booking therefore
read at its full price and the refund subtracted nothing, anywhere: the
headline total_spend, the category breakdown, the daily chart, top merchants
and the tag breakdown were all gross.
This is the same defect the general analytics fixed once already, which is why
NET_SPEND_ROWS and SPEND_SIGNED exist -- a refunded Expedia purchase read as
$2,888.92 of spend until they did. Trip analytics never adopted them. Doing so
now costs one predicate and one expression per query.
getTrips/getTripById needed the trips alias moved to `tr`: the fragments assume
`t` is `transactions`, and hand-inlining a copy rather than renaming is exactly
how the reconciled-row exclusion drifted out of the analytics routes before.
On Europe 2026 this is $821.12 -- a LuxuryEscapes booking with two part-credits
against it, and a FreeNow hold adjustment. Fully cancelled bookings are a
different case and are handled by untagging both legs from the trip by hand,
because a trip never incurred a cost it cancelled.
No balance moves: the owed query already excludes credits and a refund carries
no split. There is a test asserting exactly that, and it passes with or without
this change -- it is a guard, not a proof. The three that do prove it fail
without it.
The per-trip owed number shipped in 689fadc counted every split on every
trip transaction regardless of who paid, so it silently mixed debts owed to
different people under one label.
On Europe 2026 that meant Molina "owed" $21,572.12, of which $1,605.49 was
her share of rows Sonu paid for — a real debt, but between the other two
participants, and one they had already settled directly (split_payments id
5, Molina -> Sonu, exactly $1,605.49). A participant's own share of a row
they themselves paid for was in there too, which is nobody's debt at all.
Both sides needed scoping, not just one: the owed side to rows this owner
paid for, and the paid side to payments made to this owner. Scoping only
the first would have let a Molina -> Sonu payment reduce what Molina owes
the owner.
The corrected figures reproduce a number derived independently, months of
data apart: Molina now reads -$816.16 on Europe, matching her known
overpayment to the cent ($19,966.63 of splits against $20,782.79 paid).
Sonu goes from $8,793.10 to $1,084.61, and the owner correctly disappears
from a list of people who owe the owner.
Found by checking a household total against what the app had been showing
all along — the query was gross, gave a number about twice the real one,
and I had quoted it as "owed". Worth stating plainly: the defect was not in
the number the app displayed, it was in the number I computed to explain it.
A payment has only ever recorded from, to, amount and date. That is why
the per-trip owed figure did not exist — getTripAnalytics said so where
the number should have been: "split_payments carries no trip attribution,
so a payment cannot be assigned to a trip. Settlement is a property of the
whole relationship." Every trip therefore read 100% unsettled, including
trips paid in full.
It is also why the Shared page silently drops payments under a tag filter.
With one global pool there was nothing honest to subtract, so it showed
gross splits under the same label. A tag is a view; a scope is a ledger.
The scope is a trip, not a new settlement_contexts table. trips already
has owner_id, dates and archived, and transaction_overrides.trip_id
already decides membership. A second grouping beside it would be two
unsynchronised scopes over the same rows, with no invariant saying which
governs. NULL means the ongoing household tab, which never closes.
settled answers a different question and the two must not be collapsed:
trip_id is which tab, settled is whether the obligation is still live.
Critically, a live obligation is NOT settled by flipping the flag — it is
settled by recording the payment, and the balance nets to zero on its own.
Doing both would subtract the settlement twice. So settled is written only
by the historical import, for repayments made on a platform we no longer
run, and there is deliberately no "mark settled" action.
Both owed figures now exclude settled splits and the trip figure nets its
own payments. Spend analytics (myShare/mySplitOf) deliberately still count
settled rows: my half of a 2025 grocery shop is my spend whether or not the
other half was ever repaid, and filtering them would re-inflate exactly the
figures importing settled history exists to correct.
Also drops /api/participants/[id]/balance. It had no consumers, no owner
scoping, no debit/credit signs and no EXCLUDE_RECONCILED_SOURCE — a fourth
balance implementation that disagreed with the others and would have
imported three bugs if anything had aligned to it.
getTripAnalytics had no test at all. It has five now, including the one
that matters: a household payment must not make a trip look paid. Verified
by mutation — neutering the settled filter fails three, and dropping the
trip filter on payments fails that one.
Six metric-integrity defects from the UI/IA review, plus two found while
verifying the review's own claims against the code.
The reconciled-row exclusion existed only in queries.ts. Every analytics
route counted the superseded manual rows as spend — 48 rows, $4,474.79 of
double count, invisible precisely because the transaction list looked
right. It is now one fragment both sides import.
The spend-pace chart computed its own totals in the browser: gross
amounts, debits only, no personal share, no refunds, fees, interest or
itemised loan repayments. On live data it ended July at $4,747.31 under a
headline reading $3,597.10 — and its own baseline line was drawn from the
split-adjusted monthly totals, so the two series in one chart disagreed
with each other. Both now come from /api/analytics/daily, built from the
same fragments as the headline.
Fees aggregated every statement ever imported with no date filter, under
a heading with no period, so a lifetime figure read as a current one and
grew forever. Now bounded, labelled, and selectable.
Comparisons no longer measure a month in progress against complete ones:
the in-progress month is out of every baseline, and a selected current
month is compared through the same day.
Two the review did not catch:
- Every analytics window was a day early. toISOString() on a
local-midnight Date converts backwards through UTC. Surfaced only once
fees started reporting the range it had used.
- /monthly rounded per category, /daily per category-day, so the pace
chart ended a few cents off the headline above it.
Shared currency needed amending rather than applying. Reading s.currency
would have labelled every order row AUD, since an order receipt has no
statement and carries its own currency — the opposite convention from a
foreign charge on an AUD statement, where amount IS AUD. NATIVE_CURRENCY's
COALESCE order keeps the two apart. Balances also now count rows whose AUD
value is genuinely unknown instead of netting a foreign figure against AUD
ones. Latent today: no foreign transaction is currently split.
Tag-filtered balance cards no longer claim "owes you". With a filter on,
payments are deliberately not subtracted, so the figure is a split total
and settling against it would record a payment for a debt that never was.
Split-coverage warnings deliberately omitted (user decision).
Five rows all reading "Order - Uber Trip" are indistinguishable — the list gives
you a date and an amount and nothing to tell one ride from another (user,
2026-07-27). Where the trip went is exactly what separates them, and it was
already stored on expense_metadata.route since this morning; nothing in the list
read it.
getTransactions now joins the receipt (both directions — transaction_id OR
matched_transaction_id, since a card-settled order points at the statement line
instead) and the description cell renders "Terminal 2, Melbourne Airport (MEL)
→ 19 Lady Penrhyn Dr" in the same italic sub-line notes use.
Two deliberate limits:
- **A note the user wrote always wins.** This only fills an empty sub-line; it
never occupies the notes field, which is theirs.
- **Deliveries are excluded.** Their merchant already identifies them, so the
restaurant's street address would be clutter on every food order. Gated on
platform = 'uber'.
The summary keeps the first two comma-segments of each address — a truncation,
not a guess about geography. Uber puts the venue or street first, which is the
identifying part; the full stops with their times stay in the title attribute.
Trip rows read "Order - Uber Trip (Uber)". The suffix exists so you can tell
where to go and look; when the merchant is literally "Uber Trip" it says
nothing. What identifies a trip is its two addresses, and those are in the
Order details panel. Existing rows updated in prod.
Local rides are paid with credits (only overseas ones go on a card), so trips
belong to this slice and were simply never fetched — the Graph query searched
"order with Uber", the Eats subject. Captured 15 real messages from the mailbox
via a dry-run before touching anything, which found two defects that no amount
of reasoning about the template would have:
**Uber sends two mails per trip.** A "charge summary" when the ride ends, then
the real receipt when payment settles — same subject, same total. The summary
carries no tripReference, so order_reference fell back to `msg:<message-id>`
and I7 could not dedupe it against the receipt that follows. Every trip would
have been recorded twice. It says so itself ("This is not a payment receipt ...
You will receive a trip receipt when the payment is processed"), so it is now a
NotAReceiptError — 200 and silent, like every other expected non-receipt.
**Trip receipts label neither end of the journey.** Delivery receipts write
"1:20 pm - Pick-up"; trips print the time alone. The split regex put the time
into `label` and left `time` null. Time is now read properly, and a two-stop
trip is labelled Pick-up/Drop-off positionally — only where the receipt was
silent, so a template that does label its stops keeps its own wording.
Verified against all 15 captured messages: 7 trips recorded, 5 charge summaries
and 3 promotions skipped, 0 failures, no duplicate references. Two of the seven
are AUD credits-funded ($84.78 + $47.97) and would become transactions; the
five NZD ones are card-settled and correctly create provenance only (I5).
Fixtures ut-00 (local credits trip), ut-01 (overseas card trip) and ut-summary
(the charge summary) are captured mail, not written by hand.
These tests insert a Westpac statement and a `DD *DOORDASH ...` charge, and
only removed them at the end of the test — so they survived into the next run,
where `reconcileCardLeg` could match one at ingest time and resolve an order
that was meant to park `awaiting_card_statement`.
That is a real ordering bug in the fixtures regardless. It is my best
explanation for the intermittent failure in "parks an unresolvable split",
but I could not reproduce it: seeding the exact leftover row and running the
old code passed anyway. So this is hygiene with a plausible mechanism, not a
confirmed fix — if that test fails again, this was not the cause.
`expense_metadata` has held the itemised receipt since ingestion started and
nothing in the UI ever read it. A transaction that came from a DoorDash or Uber
Eats receipt showed a merchant and an amount, with the item list and the
delivery addresses sitting unread in the row behind it (user, 2026-07-27).
Adds GET /api/transactions/[id]/order and an "Order details" section in the
edit modal: line items with their options, pick-up/delivery stops with times
and addresses, the card tail when one was involved, and the provider's own
order reference.
Two details that matter:
- The lookup resolves from **both** sides — `transaction_id` OR
`matched_transaction_id`. A card-settled order creates no transaction of its
own (I5); the receipt points at the statement line instead. Matching only on
transaction_id would have left the panel blank on exactly the card-paid
orders, which are the ones whose detail is hardest to find elsewhere.
- An empty item list says so in words rather than rendering nothing. Uber
itemises groceries but not restaurant orders, and orders ingested before the
Uber item parser existed have none either — a blank section reads as a bug
when it is usually the receipt.
Read-only. This is what a provider sent; editing it would make provenance mean
nothing.
Four things the view could not tell you, all from reading the rows (user,
2026-07-27).
**Which platform.** The parser has always known — it has to, to read the
template — and then discarded it. "Order - Burger Corner" gives no way to know
whether to open DoorDash or Uber Eats for the detail, and restaurants exist on
both. Now stored on expense_metadata and named in the description:
"Order - Burger Corner (Uber Eats)". Migration 0021 recovers it for the 101
backfilled rows from the order_reference shape — DoorDash receipts carry no id
of their own so ingestion synthesises `msg:<message-id>`, Uber carries a real
trip UUID, which makes the discriminator exact.
**Bank said "Manual".** That label is derived, not stored, and "Manual" reads
as "hand-entered, still awaiting a card line to match". A gift-card order has
no card line coming, ever. It now reads "Gift Card", and — the part that
actually mattered — credits joins cash in needsCardMatch(), so these stop
sitting in the pending-reconciliation queue. All 81 were queued against a match
that could not exist.
**Uber line items were never parsed.** 67 of 101 orders had none. Uber itemises
groceries but not restaurant orders, so some of that is genuine; the rest was
simply unread. Its markup is better than DoorDash's — every cell carries a
data-testid with the item's uuid, so qty/title/amount bind by id rather than by
column position. Sold-out items (0.00) are kept: they are why a total is lower
than what was ordered.
**Uber prints pick-up and delivery addresses on every receipt** and they were
thrown away. Captured as `route` [{label, time, address}], de-duplicated
because the template renders the whole block twice for narrow screens. Wording
is kept as printed ("Pick-up" on some receipts, "Pickup" on others) rather than
normalised, so a template change stays visible. This is the same block a *trip*
receipt uses for start and destination — rides are not ingested today, but the
reader will not need changing when they are.
Also stores source_email_subject/from, which order ingestion had left null on
columns that already existed.
Verified against the captured corpus: route on all 6 Uber fixtures, 5/5 items
on the GLOMARK grocery receipt including the sold-out one. Production data
updated by smarthome:docker/scripts/order-presentation-2026-07-27.sql
(81 descriptions, `backfill` tag, re-run clean). `route` and Uber line items
are parsed from here on only — recovering them for already-ingested orders
means re-reading the mail, which I7 idempotency refuses by design.
Both were found by looking at the data after the live backfill, not by the
suite — 105 tests were green while 85 rows were invisible and 4 were double
counted.
owner_id was NULL on every ingested order. Analytics scope on
COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id), and an ingested order carries no statement,
so the coalesce resolved to NULL and matched no owner. The rows existed in
`transactions` and appeared in no view in the app. Ingestion now sets
DEFAULT_OWNER_ID, and a regression test asserts the row survives the same
COALESCE scoping the UI uses.
[Family] orders are card-settled, not credits-funded. Their receipts name the
payer ("Payments Siddharth LKR 3,783.20") and no instrument, which an earlier
version read as credits. The card statement carries all four of them (CBA
...3893, exact foreign_currency_amount matches), so creating a transaction
duplicated spend already recorded — the double-count I5 exists to prevent.
They now record provenance only; the statement line is the transaction and is
what carries the `family` tag that keeps them out of budgets.
Production data corrected separately by
smarthome:docker/scripts/fix-order-backfill-2026-07-27.sql.
Also: reconciliation tests no longer assert global row counts.
reconcilePendingOrders() scans every pending row, so leftovers from other
files moved the totals — the source of an intermittent failure that only
appeared on the first run after a source edit.
Backfill dry-run over 130 real messages surfaced one 422: 'payments sum to 1.17
but receipt states 16.50'. The receipt is a mixed Uber payment —
Uber Cash $1.17 + Westpac ••••8032 $15.33 — and the card regex only matched
Visa|MasterCard|American Express|Amex, so an issuer-named leg was dropped
entirely. validateOrderTotals correctly refused it rather than recording $1.17
as the cost of a $16.50 order.
Anchors on the ••••NNNN masking instead, which also covers the form already
seen in the corpus ('Mastercard ••••3893 (CBA Ultimate) CHF 51.23'). Fixture
and regression test added.
Also repoints .env.test at the current postgres-personal container IP and
documents why: the container publishes no host port, so the address changes on
every recreate and the whole integration suite fails with connection errors
until it is refreshed.
None of these were caught by 105 green tests, because the code they live in was
barely tested and the HTTP path was not tested at all.
1. reconcilePendingOrders hardcoded category 'dining', so any order resolved
through the deferred path booked as dining regardless of merchant — a
Woolworths grocery order that parks and later reconciles was misfiled.
That reintroduced, through the back door, exactly the misfiling
resolveCategory() exists to prevent. Now calls it.
2. reconcileCardLeg never marked a statement line as consumed, so two orders on
the same card inside the +/-4 day window both bound to the same charge and
each booked its own credits remainder — double-counting spend. At 10-15
orders a month on one card that is not a corner case. Migration 0020 adds
matched_transaction_id with a unique index; the matcher now excludes lines
already claimed.
3. The ingest API returned HTTP 200 for every parse failure, and the Slack
alert fires only on non-200. So the single most likely production failure —
a provider template change breaking every order at once — was completely
silent. Split into NotAReceiptError (promotions, delivery updates, refund
and adjustment notices: 200, silent, expected traffic) and OrderParseError
(it IS a receipt and would not parse: 422, alerts).
Also: order_reference now anchors on Uber's own tripReference cell rather than
'first UUID in the document'. I had claimed to verify that the first UUID was
always the order UUID; that check compared against zero samples and was
vacuous. tripReference is present in all 29 captured receipts and, for ue-00,
equals the UUID the PDF redirect resolves to. The positional fallback remains
but only flags when there is genuine ambiguity.
Adds the API route's first tests — auth gate and error taxonomy — plus
anchoring regressions. 63 unit + 53 integration green on five consecutive runs;
corpus holds at 63/65.
Closes the three gaps left after the parser rebuild.
Refund amendments. ue-05 is a real refund: 'Previous total $49.94 / Refund
-$4.21 / New Total $45.73'. Uber reuses the order UUID across the receipt and
the amendment, so the two can be matched. The transaction is reduced in place
rather than offset with a second row — the order is one event whose cost
changed, and a compensating row would misreport both the meal count and the
merchant's spend. When the original was never ingested, nothing is invented.
[Family] orders now import instead of parking. Their payment line names the
payer, not an instrument ('Payments Siddharth LKR 3,783.20'), so no split is
recoverable and there is no card leg to reconcile against — they would have sat
pending forever, which fails the actual requirement to import and tag them.
Treated as credits, flagged as an assumption. Safe because the family tag
removes them from every budget regardless of instrument, and the LKR amount is
preserved with amount_aud left NULL rather than asserting an FX rate.
Ingest API. n8n now POSTs each message to /api/orders/ingest instead of parsing
in a Code node — the n8n sandbox has no require or fs, so a parser there cannot
be tested against the fixture corpus, which is the one thing that makes this
parser trustworthy. Auth is a shared secret, since machine callers have no
Traefik session header. Rejections return 422 and record nothing.
60 unit + 45 integration green on three consecutive runs; 63/65 corpus holds.
Ingestion now runs on the rebuilt parser. Three substantive changes.
Deferred card reconciliation. A 'MasterCard 8032 and/or credits' receipt never
states the split, but the card leg lands on the statement — Subway's $29.08
order shows $13.06 on 8032, so $16.02 was credits. For a live order that
statement is weeks away, so the split cannot be settled at ingest time. Such
orders are now parked with provenance and no transaction, and
reconcilePendingOrders() resolves them once the statement arrives. Backfill
takes the same path and resolves immediately. Migration 0019 adds the columns
that make an order resumable; applied to personal_test only, prod untouched.
Payment detection bug, found by the new tests: the old regex delimited the
'Paid with' line on a double space, which whitespace collapsing removes. Every
card and mixed receipt fell through to the credits branch — the Woolworths
receipt booked $60.93 of credits spend that never happened.
Category resolution reversed deliberately. Correction 1 said never default to
dining; the implementation of that sent everything unrecognised to 'other', and
knowing six merchants meant Carl's Jr, Taco Bell, Chilli India, Oporto, Schnitz
and Souvlaki GR all landed there. Grocers are an enumerable set and restaurants
are not, so match groceries explicitly and let the residual be dining.
Tests rebuilt on real captured receipts; the synthetic fixtures are deleted.
60 unit + 41 integration green on three consecutive runs.
The previous parser was written against synthetic fixtures shaped to match the
code. It invented a table layout DoorDash does not send, generated
order_reference from Math.random(), read the order date from a 'Date:' string
present in no real message, and detected [Family] by searching the body for the
substring 'family'. Its tests passed because the fixtures were built to satisfy
it. Against 36 real DoorDash and 29 real Uber Eats receipts it does not work.
Rebuilt from the real corpus. 63 of 65 now parse and validate; the 2 rejected
are correctly rejected — one is an order-adjustment notice and one a refund,
neither of which is a receipt.
Corrects an inherited diagnosis: the Mad Mex 'Discounts -$24.09' was recorded
as an HTML-flattening artefact masking a 'true discount of $9.45'. Parsing the
table cells structurally returns the same figures and no $9.45 exists anywhere
in the message — DoorDash genuinely prints a Discounts line that equals subtotal
plus service fee, and the components fail to reconcile on 32 of 36 receipts. So
the breakdown is stored as provenance and never gated on; validation instead
cross-checks the two independently stated totals and the payment line, which is
the number that becomes money.
Real-world cases the corpus forced, none of which were in the spec: [Family]
orders are LKR purchases for family in Sri Lanka (reading them as dollars
inflates ~200x), Swiss orders arrive in CHF, grocery 'Final receipt' mails carry
no Total Charged row, and a declined payment is printed alongside the successful
retry and must be skipped or it records money that never moved.
order_reference now comes from the Uber order UUID embedded in the body, or the
provider message id where DoorDash supplies no order id at all — never random,
so re-ingestion is genuinely idempotent.
Tests 12 & 13 asserted that every 'ShopBack Gift Cards' row becomes a transfer.
Resolved against the ShopBack purchase emails, 3 of the 14 matching rows are
Airbnb, 1 Shell, 1 Amazon — the bank descriptor's trailing token is a sequence
counter, not a brand code, so the description cannot identify what was bought.
Only $313.66 of $3,411.16 was ever reclassifiable.
Withdrawn rather than narrowed: making it safe needs ShopBack purchase-email
ingestion, brand resolution and an approval gate, to correctly handle 2
transactions in 20 months. Those two rows get handled by hand.
- Extract evaluateCondition + rule types into src/lib/rules.ts for testability
- 48 unit tests for evaluateCondition (all fields/operators) and formatCategory
- 21 integration tests for getTransactions filters and getParticipantBalances
- Vitest configs for unit (vitest.config.ts) and integration (vitest.integration.config.ts)
- setup-test-db.sh creates personal_test DB from production schema via pg_dump
- Use vi.doMock + dynamic import pattern to isolate test DB from Prisma singleton
siddharthd