Commit Graph
35 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
siddharthd 79940202f1 orders: fix the 42703 that broke EVERY order detail page
getOrderDetail joined order_merchant_cadence on merchant_entity_id. Migration
021 rekeyed that view to merchant_key (merchant_entity_id is NULL on ~9% of the
feed, and duplicate merchant entities split one shop's history); 027 and 029
moved order_feed and order_spend across, and this query was missed. Every
/orders/<key> request has since failed with

  column rec.merchant_entity_id does not exist

The reason nobody saw a 500 is the second half of this commit: the page
collapsed every failure into 'That order could not be found.' A server fault
wearing the costume of a data condition reads as an empty spine and gets
investigated in the wrong repo. The hook now carries the status and only a
genuine 404 says the order is missing.
2026-08-12 17:10:13 +10:00
siddharthd b26d526e83 orders: a browse surface for the purchase history the ledger cannot show
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 59s
The spine holds ~6,300 purchase orders back to 2006, ~4,600 of them itemised,
and 61 reach a transaction. Everything else has been visible only through SQL.
This adds /orders and /orders/[entityKey] over it.

The point of the page is the manifest. /transactions can only ever say "AMAZON
AU MARKETPLACE SYDNEY"; a row here says what was in the box, which is the one
thing the ledger structurally cannot carry.

Five lanes, because the shapes genuinely differ — retail ends refunded or
returned 14.1% of the time against food's 5.1%, food has no meaningful ETA where
grocery has one on 54.8% of orders, digital never ships at all. The lane comes
from order_lane() in migration 018 rather than a column, because slug 'uber'
carries 394 taxi rides and 485 Eats orders.

Defaults to this year: 449 orders rather than 6,283. Twenty-one years is the
archive, not the working set.

Three things the data forced. Unknown amounts render "not stated", never $0.00,
because 1,648 orders have no amount and a zero would be false. A full reversal
strikes the figure through; a partial refund does not, since striking $191.40
when $13.33 came back is a lie — the charge stays primary and the credit sits
under it with the net. And rows with no amount, no reference and one lifecycle
event are hidden by default, which lifts amount coverage from 74% to 84%; the
toggle says on its face that it is a workaround for board 210 rather than a fix.

Reads are raw SQL in lib/order-feed.ts rather than queries.ts: the spine is
written by the ingestion-engine, is not in prisma/schema.prisma and never will
be, and mixing it into a file where everything is Prisma-modelled would destroy
that invariant.

/orders is gated by an explicit viewer allowlist. Not because the three people
listed need protecting from each other — everything here is on one person's
cards — but because a participant is an accounting entity and any participant
row with an email is a login. Adding someone to split a holiday must not
silently hand them the purchase history.

Verified live: gate returns 403 for non-participants and for a missing identity
header; search "drone" finds the DJI order through its line items; the detail
page renders its three lifecycle events and its Afterpay settlement sibling; and
a bridged Amazon order shows both split-shipment charges.
2026-08-12 12:15:16 +10:00
siddharthd 7f8e363b5b order details: hide the review surface for spine-bridged retail rows
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 58s
Verdicts are the meal lane's feedback loop (loved/never steers the next
restaurant order and the nudge card warns on re-order). Bridge rows
(source='order-bridge': Amazon, eBay, Officeworks...) have no such loop,
so ItemVerdictToggle and OrderVerdict stay hidden there. The order API
now returns 'source'; OrderReceipt.platform widened to string — the
bridge writes real platform slugs beyond the meal trio.
2026-08-10 18:02:51 +10:00
siddharthd cb7665ded1 Let everyone on a trip see it, and give payments their scope back
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 52s
Trips were scoped to trips.owner_id, so Sonu saw no trips at all — despite
having paid for 104 of the tagged rows herself. Her own spending was invisible
on the only page organised around it.

A participant is now anyone with a split on, who paid for, or whose payment is
scoped to, a transaction tagged to the trip. Derived, not stored. A
trip_participants table was designed and rejected: the expenses already carry
the fact, and two records of one fact drift apart. Deriving it also excludes
Singapore + Bangkok 2026 from Sonu for free, which a table would have to be kept
in sync to do. Siddharth 4 trips, Sonu 3, Molina 1.

Everything about a trip is shared except delete. Both trip foreign keys are
ON DELETE SET NULL, so deleting Europe 2026 untags 210 transactions and NULLs
the trip scope on 6 payments — where the hand-derived Europe-first allocation
lives, which nothing recomputes. That stays with the owner.

Trip owed now returns both directions and nets neither. An obligation lives on a
row someone else paid for, so a viewer-as-payer figure can never hold it, and
Sonu's Europe read "you are owed $2,408.24" while omitting the $8,004.04 she
owed. Collapsing the two into a signed net is the tempting next step and would
have corrupted the scope allocation: the grouped-payment allocation cleared each
trip against the one-directional gross, so redefining the debt afterwards turns
$8,004.04 already allocated into an $802.75 over-allocation with household
understated by the same amount. Verified byte-identical — Auckland $1,505.64,
Europe Molina -$816.16, Europe Sonu $0.00, Sonu + Sunny $0.00.

getTransactions gained trip_all_rows so a participant sees the whole trip. It is
opt-in and not implied by trip_id, because the same endpoint backs the main
transactions list and its trip filter must keep owner scoping. Participation is
re-checked in SQL, so passing the flag for someone else's trip returns nothing.

Payments can finally say what they settle. trip_id has existed since migration
0022 but POST never read it and GET never returned it, so every payment made in
the app landed on household and the 9 trip-scoped rows were hand-written SQL.
"Both" needs no new shape — one row per scope sharing a linked_transaction_id.

Three write paths had no authorisation at all and were reachable by any
participant: assignTransactionsToTrip checked nothing, DELETE on a payment
deleted by bare id, and POST accepted any from/to pair. All three now check.

Also fixes the test suite, which was pointing at postgres-pantry: container IPs
move on recreation and 172.22.0.47 stopped being postgres-personal. It only
failed safe because the credentials did not match — resetDB now refuses to
truncate anything not named personal_test.

22 new tests, 276 passing, build clean.
2026-08-02 19:11:19 +10:00
siddharthd f6c500b27a Hide transfers in the transactions view by default
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 51s
Transfers move money between your own accounts; at 433 of 3,996 rows
(~11%) they crowd out the rows that represent actual spending.

getTransactions gains `exclude_categories`, opt-in per caller and
deliberately not defaulted in queries.ts: the rules preview and the bulk
rule-apply path both read candidate rows through getTransactions, and a
default exclusion there would silently shrink what a rule can see and
reach — invisibly, since a rule that matches nothing looks the same as a
rule with nothing to do.

Two behaviours the filter needs, both tested:

- An explicit category pick beats the exclusion. Selecting "Transfers"
  while the default is on subtracts it from the hidden list instead of
  returning zero rows and reading as "you have no transfers".
- COALESCE the effective category to '' before `<> ALL`. NULL <> ALL(...)
  is NULL, not true, so an uncategorised row would disappear from a
  filter that never named its category — the trap EXCLUDE_NON_SPEND
  already documents.

The default is off when the view is scoped to a statement: that is a
reconciliation view, the row count has to match the statement, and a
credit-card payment is the row you went there to check.
2026-07-30 23:34:31 +10:00
siddharthd 22e4a1ead0 fix(splits): make every split account for 100%
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 1m39s
A 50/50 arrangement was stored as a single row saying "Sonu 50%". The
arithmetic was never wrong — `myShare` resolves the payer's share as
`100 - SUM(everyone else)`, so balances and per-user spend were correct
throughout. It was still a bug, because a ledger is read as well as
computed: on screen that row is a 50% share against a blank, which looks
like half the money is unallocated and is indistinguishable from a split
somebody abandoned half-finished.

It also leaked. `getSharedTransactions` filters by participant with an
EXISTS on an explicit split row, so filtering the Shared view by the
payer silently dropped every transaction where their share was only ever
implied.

Four write paths could produce it, three of them unguarded:

  - the Slack nudge's share button, which inserted one row
  - `POST /api/transactions`, where the add form shows an amber total
    under 100 but saves anyway — this is how Lawn Mowing and Hedge
    Pruning were stored
  - `applyRuleActions`, where ten of the fourteen live split rules name
    only the other person

`completeSplit` is now the single place that writes the remainder, and
every one of those paths ends in it. The remainder goes to the
transaction's *owner*, never to "me": the owner's row on their own
transaction is excluded from both halves of the balance query, so it
cannot create, enlarge or discharge a debt, whereas a row for me on
someone else's transaction is a real obligation. That distinction is
what makes this safe to apply to existing data.

Also fixes the order panel's "Shared 50/50" toggle, which was inert in
both directions: it posted a lone 50% row to share (rejected — must
total 100%) and an empty array to un-share (rejected — array required),
because no way to clear a split existed. DELETE on the splits route is
that way.

Backfill: 7 rows, verified against a row-level dump diff — 2549 -> 2556
rows, none removed, none modified — and participant balances byte
identical before and after (Molina 19556.07, Sonu 20913.35). Every split
in the database now totals 100%.

Not done: a database-level constraint. Enforcing the sum needs a
deferred constraint trigger, and the rule path commits its DELETE and
INSERT as separate statements, so the trigger would reject the
intermediate state. Making it work means wrapping every write path in a
transaction, which is a larger change than the defect warrants.
2026-07-29 10:23:06 +10:00
siddharthd d458228625 feat(orders): a fifth verdict, 'bad', between ok and never again
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 47s
The jump from "OK" to "Never again" is too big and most
disappointments live in the gap (user, 2026-07-28) — so a merely poor
meal either flattered itself as OK or got blacklisted.

Only 'never' raises the warning on a future order. A blacklist that fires
for every mediocre delivery is one nobody reads, so 'bad' records the
disappointment without triggering the alarm. Both set order_again = false
— you would not choose either again — and that split between "would I
order it" and "warn me about it" is the point of the extra level.

Migration widens the CHECK; nothing is removed, so no existing row needs
mapping.
2026-07-28 19:12:26 +10:00
siddharthd 0cb46a087b feat(orders): record what we thought of an order, per person
The ledger already knew we had ordered from a place; it did not know the
food was bad. Orders got repeated from places we disliked because nobody
remembered by the time the next one went in. That is what the receipt
ingestion was for (ING-9) and the last piece was missing: order_reviews
existed as a table with no API, no UI and no writes.

Four levels, not three. "Loved" and "liked" are both "would order again"
but only one is worth a detour, and "ok" is not a recommendation.

A verdict belongs to a person, not to an order. A shared meal produces
two opinions and they routinely disagree — that disagreement is the
useful part, and the old UNIQUE on transaction_id alone could not hold
it. Now UNIQUE (transaction_id, participant_id), and the default is the
signed-in user rather than the owner: Sonu authenticates through the same
Traefik OAuth as participant 4, so an owner default would have filed her
verdict under his name.

Per-item opinions key on the item DESCRIPTION, not its index. An index is
meaningless across orders; "the Pad Thai here is good" is the signal that
has to survive into the next order from the same merchant. Only the two
poles are offered — a per-item "ok" answers neither of the questions you
ask at order time.

Sharing is recorded as a real 50/50 split, not a decorative flag. The
split already IS the record that an order was shared, and two records of
one fact drift apart.

An ABSENT item_verdicts means "leave them alone"; an empty array clears
them. Without that distinction a note-only save silently wipes every
per-item opinion — the same shape as the bug that reset `settled` on
split rewrites, and just as invisible on screen. Mutation-tested: making
keepItems a no-op fails exactly one test.

mockDbWithPool gained queryRow. Omitting an export from the mock makes it
undefined at the call site, which fails as "not a function" and reads
like a code bug rather than a test-harness gap.
2026-07-28 15:31:22 +10:00
siddharthd a4ab543a6c fix(analytics): make the displayed numbers mean what they say
ci / lint-test (push) Failing after 44s
Six metric-integrity defects from the UI/IA review, plus two found while
verifying the review's own claims against the code.

The reconciled-row exclusion existed only in queries.ts. Every analytics
route counted the superseded manual rows as spend — 48 rows, $4,474.79 of
double count, invisible precisely because the transaction list looked
right. It is now one fragment both sides import.

The spend-pace chart computed its own totals in the browser: gross
amounts, debits only, no personal share, no refunds, fees, interest or
itemised loan repayments. On live data it ended July at $4,747.31 under a
headline reading $3,597.10 — and its own baseline line was drawn from the
split-adjusted monthly totals, so the two series in one chart disagreed
with each other. Both now come from /api/analytics/daily, built from the
same fragments as the headline.

Fees aggregated every statement ever imported with no date filter, under
a heading with no period, so a lifetime figure read as a current one and
grew forever. Now bounded, labelled, and selectable.

Comparisons no longer measure a month in progress against complete ones:
the in-progress month is out of every baseline, and a selected current
month is compared through the same day.

Two the review did not catch:

- Every analytics window was a day early. toISOString() on a
  local-midnight Date converts backwards through UTC. Surfaced only once
  fees started reporting the range it had used.
- /monthly rounded per category, /daily per category-day, so the pace
  chart ended a few cents off the headline above it.

Shared currency needed amending rather than applying. Reading s.currency
would have labelled every order row AUD, since an order receipt has no
statement and carries its own currency — the opposite convention from a
foreign charge on an AUD statement, where amount IS AUD. NATIVE_CURRENCY's
COALESCE order keeps the two apart. Balances also now count rows whose AUD
value is genuinely unknown instead of netting a foreign figure against AUD
ones. Latent today: no foreign transaction is currently split.

Tag-filtered balance cards no longer claim "owes you". With a filter on,
payments are deliberately not subtracted, so the figure is a split total
and settling against it would record a payment for a debt that never was.

Split-coverage warnings deliberately omitted (user decision).
2026-07-27 17:10:27 +10:00
siddharthd b6cd62f7b5 feat(orders): show the receipt in the transaction detail panel
ci / lint-test (push) Failing after 47s
`expense_metadata` has held the itemised receipt since ingestion started and
nothing in the UI ever read it. A transaction that came from a DoorDash or Uber
Eats receipt showed a merchant and an amount, with the item list and the
delivery addresses sitting unread in the row behind it (user, 2026-07-27).

Adds GET /api/transactions/[id]/order and an "Order details" section in the
edit modal: line items with their options, pick-up/delivery stops with times
and addresses, the card tail when one was involved, and the provider's own
order reference.

Two details that matter:

- The lookup resolves from **both** sides — `transaction_id` OR
  `matched_transaction_id`. A card-settled order creates no transaction of its
  own (I5); the receipt points at the statement line instead. Matching only on
  transaction_id would have left the panel blank on exactly the card-paid
  orders, which are the ones whose detail is hardest to find elsewhere.
- An empty item list says so in words rather than rendering nothing. Uber
  itemises groceries but not restaurant orders, and orders ingested before the
  Uber item parser existed have none either — a blank section reads as a bug
  when it is usually the receipt.

Read-only. This is what a provider sent; editing it would make provenance mean
nothing.
2026-07-27 10:55:57 +10:00
siddharthd 3778bfe836 feat(rules): show what an apply run changed, and which rule ran
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 38s
Apply History listed only counts - '13 matches · 13 transactions' - which reads
identically whether the run renamed a merchant or split every transaction with
another participant. Revert is destructive, so that is not enough to decide on.

Two additions. Migration 0017 records rule_id, rule_name and source on each run:
rule_name is denormalised so history stays readable after a rule is edited or
deleted, and there is no FK so deleting a rule cannot cascade away the audit
trail. Both write paths now populate it - the condition-matched run and the
selection-based quick action.

And rows expand to show the run's snapshot set against current values: which
transactions were touched and what changed on each. Rows changed by something
else since the run are called out, because reverting restores the pre-run value
and would discard that later edit.

Runs recorded before this show 'Unknown rule' - the rule they came from is not
recoverable.
2026-07-26 15:20:56 +10:00
siddharthd cc852e7c6f feat(rules): preview what a rule would change before applying it
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 34s
Selecting a rule now shows the transactions it would alter, so a subset can be
ticked and applied rather than trusting a bulk run. The apply step takes explicit
transaction ids (the existing bulk apply_rule path), so what you tick is exactly
what changes - a rule whose conditions are too broad cannot reach further than
the preview showed.

Matches are split into 'would change' and 'already correct'. A merchant
normalisation rule matching 400 rows where 380 already hold the right value is 20
changes and 380 rows of noise; only the 20 are listed.

Preview is offered for every rule including manual_only quick actions, which
previously had no way to see their reach at all. A rule with no conditions
matches every transaction - that is how apply already behaves, so the preview
reports it prominently rather than hiding it.

Applies still snapshot to rule_apply_runs, so they remain revertable.
2026-07-26 15:08:29 +10:00
siddharthd 030490efa3 feat(cash): mark how a transaction was paid, exclude cash from reconciliation
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 41s
getPendingReconciliations treated every unreconciled manual transaction as
awaiting a matching statement row. Cash never appears on a statement, so a cash
entry sat in the queue indefinitely being offered matches within 3 days and 1%
on amount - and accepting one is silently destructive: reconciled manual rows
are filtered out of every query, so the cash spend disappears while the card
transaction it matched claims to be that same spend.

Migration 0016 adds transactions.payment_method (card | cash | bank_transfer |
other, NULL = unknown) with a CHECK constraint and a partial index. The notCash()
fragment excludes cash from both halves of the reconciliation query - the pending
list and the candidate match subquery, which aliases the manual row as m.

Only cash is excluded. Bank transfers do appear on a statement now that
transaction accounts are imported, and NULL means unknown, so both stay
candidates and every pre-existing row behaves exactly as before.

ATM withdrawals deliberately stay categorised as spend rather than transfers.
Treating them as transfers is only correct if every cash purchase is logged;
with partial logging it silently deletes the unlogged remainder from spend.
2026-07-26 14:38:47 +10:00
siddharthd e0b0fc91e0 feat(rules): manual-only rules as one-click quick actions on selected transactions
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 52s
A rule flagged manual_only never runs in the apply-all pass; instead it shows
as a button in the transactions bulk bar and applies its actions to the current
selection (conditions ignored — the selection is the condition). Recorded as a
rule_apply_run, so it reverts from Rules -> Apply History like any other run.

Motivation: tagging Home + splitting 50/50 with Sonu was two bulk actions every
time. Now it is one click, and any other combo can be defined the same way.

Extracts the action-application and snapshot logic from the apply route into
src/lib/rule-actions.ts so both callers share one implementation — splits upsert
rather than delete+reinsert, so settled flags survive.
2026-07-25 23:02:26 +10:00
siddharthd 48ec151c15 feat(trips): trip tracking with analytics, tag conversion, and transaction assignment
Adds trips table usage across API and UI: trip CRUD, per-trip analytics
(category/daily/merchant/tag/participant breakdowns), tag-to-trip
conversion, trip assignment via transaction overrides, and trip filter
in the transactions view. Recovered from working tree after local git
corruption; feature was already live via host-context Docker builds.
2026-07-19 20:00:51 +10:00
siddharthd b8cd1b0f89 fix(reconcile): prevent split/tag double-counting on reconciled transactions
Move splits, tags and overrides from manual to statement side on reconcile
(delete from manual after copying) instead of just copying. Add read-time
filter to exclude reconciled manual transactions from balance and shared
transaction queries. Also adds participant filter to shared expenses page.
2026-05-11 19:15:41 +10:00
siddharthd 0c1f88ed9c feat(transactions): add imported date column, split filter, and sortable columns
- Show created_at as "Imported" column in transactions and shared views
- For reconciled transactions, show original CSV import date (not statement processing date) via LEFT JOIN on reconciled_with_id
- Add has_split filter (all/split only/unsplit only) to transactions page
- Transactions table: sortable by imported date; split filter dropdown
- Shared table: client-side sort by date, imported, and amount
2026-05-10 16:04:54 +10:00
siddharthd 4a49add277 feat: CSV import and batch reconciliation UI
- Add reconciled_with_id column to transactions (links manual → statement tx)
- CSV import wizard: 4-step modal (upload → map columns → review → done)
  - Handles any bank format via column mapping with localStorage presets
  - Single signed or separate debit/credit column modes
  - Editable preview table before committing
  - Auto-tags all imported rows with 'csv-import'
- Batch reconcile page: shows all unreconciled manual transactions with
  potential statement matches (date ±3 days, amount ±1%) pre-fetched
  - Select matches across multiple rows, apply all at once
  - Copies overrides/tags/splits from manual → statement tx atomically
  - Manual tx marked reconciled (linked), hidden from main transactions view
  - Transactions with no matches shown separately
- Import CSV button on transactions page
- Reconcile nav item in sidebar
2026-04-13 06:23:08 +10:00
siddharthd 0a1f6b48a2 feat(ui): mobile-responsive sidebar + rules improvements
- Sidebar: hidden on mobile, opens as slide-out drawer with hamburger
  toggle; auto-closes on navigation; desktop layout unchanged
- Layout: responsive padding accounting for mobile header bar
- Rules: add tag as a condition field (has/not-has tag)
- Rules: apply a single rule via per-rule Apply button
- Rules: splits-from defaults to 2026-01-09
2026-03-21 08:33:08 +11:00
siddharthd d53d3106f2 fix(shared): tag filter SQL precedence, balance cards filter by tag 2026-03-14 21:30:33 +11:00
siddharthd 02ac136e19 fix(payment): crash on open due to amount.toFixed on numeric string
feat(shared): tag filter on shared transactions list
2026-03-14 21:27:08 +11:00
siddharthd 85e7801407 feat(shared): replace settle buttons with payment ledger
- New split_payments table records actual payments between participants
- Balance = total split obligations - total payments (splits never marked settled)
- Record Payment modal per participant: direction toggle, amount pre-filled with balance, date, notes
- Payment history inline on each balance card with +/- display and delete
- Per-transaction Settle button removed; Action column removed from shared table
- Splits always show the true cost breakdown regardless of payment state
2026-03-14 21:09:00 +11:00
siddharthd 5206388958 feat(filters): smart query bar with amount operators and multi-select dropdowns
- Query bar parses >500, >=500, <500, <=500, 500-1500 into amount_min/max filters
- Parsed tokens shown as dismissable chips below the query bar
- Category, Bank, Tag, Type filters upgraded from single-select to multi-select
- MultiSelect dropdown component with checkbox list and active-state border
- Backend: TransactionFilters uses string[] for categories/bank_names/tag_ids/transaction_types
- SQL: ANY($n::text[]) / ANY($n::int[]) for array filters
2026-03-14 20:39:28 +11:00
siddharthd fc22a61a43 feat(transactions): manual transaction support and multi-owner query infrastructure
- Add POST /api/transactions to create manual transactions (statement_id=NULL, owner_id set directly)
- Queries switch from JOIN to LEFT JOIN statements so manual transactions are visible
- COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id) throughout for owner resolution
- Add "Manual" bank filter option in getTransactions
- Search extended to include merchant_normalized override
- Split data fetched via lateral subquery on every transaction row
- getParticipantBalances rewritten as UNION for bidirectional net balances
  (credits/refunds negate, split from either side of the relationship)
- getSharedTransactions: remove my_share_percent from SELECT (fixes GROUP BY error),
  WHERE rewritten as two distinct cases (owner with others split vs participant on others' txn)
- getTransactions: OR EXISTS condition so split participants see shared transactions
- add-transaction-modal component for creating manual transactions with splits
- 0008_my_share_percent migration adds my_share_percent to transaction_overrides
2026-03-14 20:04:00 +11:00
siddharthd af4c64bba7 feat(splits): save split as rule from split modal
- Checkbox in split modal: 'Also save as rule for <merchant>'
- Creates a rule with apply_split action storing the participant shares
- Rules engine now handles apply_split: deletes existing splits and re-applies
- Bulk split mode hides the checkbox (rule wouldn't make sense for ad-hoc bulk)
2026-03-11 12:40:03 +11:00
siddharthd 7b3fd4b65f fix(merchants): net spend accounting for refunds/credits
- Merchant totals now show net spend (gross debits minus refunds)
- Refund count and amount shown in profile drawer and table
- Scatter plot Y-axis uses net_spend, X-axis uses debit_count
- Per-merchant transaction history includes refunds (shown as negative)
- Monthly trend chart reflects net spend per month
2026-03-10 00:43:58 +11:00
siddharthd dd11019fdf fix(transactions): editable transaction type, fee/interest counted as spend, fees category
- TypeBadge is now clickable — opens inline select to change debit/credit/fee/interest/etc.
- PATCH /api/transactions/[id] now accepts transaction_type, updates transactions table directly
- Analytics monthly query includes fee and interest types as spend (not just debit)
- fee and interest amounts show red in transaction list (same as debit)
- Add fees category to taxonomy
2026-03-10 00:24:42 +11:00
siddharthd 714c5a9b25 feat(merchants): scatter plot, merchant profiles, and per-merchant transaction history
- /merchants page with spend-vs-frequency scatter chart (click to open profile)
- Merchant profile drawer: stats, monthly trend line, full transaction history
- /api/analytics/merchants: split-adjusted merchant aggregates + monthly trends
- /api/analytics/merchants/[merchant]: per-merchant transaction list
- Add Merchants nav item to sidebar
2026-03-10 00:05:48 +11:00
siddharthd c1d031511a feat(insights): committed/discretionary chart, recurring charge detection, fees & interest audit 2026-03-09 23:04:52 +11:00
siddharthd d1a0eedf03 feat(analytics): cashflow view with income/investment/net — split-adjusted + multi-currency
- Add 'investment' category (shares, ETFs, super)
- Analytics API: separate income, investment, expense queries; use amount_aud for FX-aware sums
- Analytics page: cashflow summary (income/expenses/invested/net cash), grouped bar chart,
  income + invested rows in 6-month trend table
- MonthlyAnalytics interface: add income, investments, net fields to totals
- DB: amount_aud + exchange_rate_to_aud columns added and backfilled (in prior migration)
2026-03-08 19:15:20 +11:00
siddharthd be85822cc7 merge: Phase 5 (Rules Engine) + Phase 6 (Budget & Analytics)
Resolve additive conflicts in schema.prisma and hooks.ts — both models and all hooks retained.
2026-03-08 17:09:57 +11:00
siddharthd d455738732 feat(finance): Phase 6 — Budget & Analytics
Add monthly budgets per category with spend-vs-budget dashboard and 6-month trend table.
Includes upsert budget API, monthly analytics endpoint, inline budget editing, and route auth fixes.
2026-03-08 16:57:33 +11:00
siddharthd 31cffbe1bb feat(finance): Phase 5 — Rules Engine
Add rules engine with CRUD API, condition/action evaluation, and apply-all endpoint.
UI: rule builder form with field/operator/value conditions, tag multi-select, apply button with result stats.
2026-03-08 16:56:13 +11:00
siddharthd 93450f7caa feat(finance): Phase 4 — Tags
- tags table: name, color; transaction_tags junction table
- GET/POST /api/tags; DELETE /api/tags/:id
- POST/DELETE /api/transactions/:id/tags for per-transaction tagging
- Bulk tag/untag via /api/transactions/bulk (action: tag/untag)
- Tags returned inline with transaction list via LATERAL join
- Tag filter on Transactions page
- Bulk "Tag as..." in bulk action bar
- Tag pills + "+" picker on each transaction row
- /tags page: create with color picker, list with counts, delete
2026-03-08 16:28:03 +11:00
siddharthd 35a5be97b0 feat: initial finance SPA — phases 1 & 2
Next.js 16 personal finance dashboard connected to postgres-personal.

Phase 1 (Foundation):
- API routes: GET /api/transactions (paginated, filterable, sortable),
  GET /api/statements, GET /api/merchants
- Transactions data table with date/category/bank/search filters, pagination, sort
- Statements card grid with period, due date, amount, transaction count
- Sidebar layout with nav for all planned sections

Phase 2 (Normalisation):
- PATCH /api/transactions/[id] — upsert transaction_overrides
- POST /api/transactions/bulk — bulk categorize/normalize
- Inline click-to-edit category (22 options) and merchant name
- Blue dot override indicator, bulk action bar
- Effective values via COALESCE(override, llm_value) pattern

Stack: Next.js 16 (App Router, standalone), Prisma 7.x + @prisma/adapter-pg,
TanStack Query, Tailwind CSS. Auth via Traefik chain-oauth@file.
2026-03-07 23:31:40 +11:00