chore(ci): clear the lint debt and make lint blocking (#79)
CI ran lint with continue-on-error because 23 errors predated it. All are fixed, so the flag is gone and a typecheck step is added beside it — nothing else in CI compiles the test files, so a type error in a fixture could only ever be found on a developer's machine. Real fixes, no blanket disables and no suppressions: - react-hooks/set-state-in-effect (6): each was "reset or seed state when an input changes", so each becomes a state adjustment during render behind a previous-value guard — the documented React pattern for it. Two were also latent bugs. transactions/page.tsx depended on `others`, rebuilt by .filter() every render, so the effect already ran every render, one commit late. shared/page.tsx depended on the `tagIds` array identity, so the row window was reset more often than "changing any filter" claims — including after "Show more", the one interaction it must not undo; the key now joins by value. csv-import-modal reads localStorage once at mount, which is a lazy useState initializer, not an effect (SSR-guarded, though the modal is mounted from client state and never prerenders). - react-hooks/static-components (3): SortIcon was declared inside SharedPage, making it a new component type on every render. Hoisted to module scope with the sort state passed as props. - @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any (9): the dynamically imported route handlers in two integration tests. Typed as their real signatures with one `as unknown as NextRequest` cast at the fixture boundary, so the call sites and response bodies get checked instead of opted out. - react/no-unescaped-entities (5): exact-equivalent entities (', "), so no rendered text changes. Also fixes the one pre-existing tsc error (unit/order-ingestion.test.ts:511): `options` is optional, and `?? 0` keeps the assertion failing on an absent list rather than silencing it with a non-null bang. 9 warnings remain (no-unused-vars, exhaustive-deps). eslint exits 0 on warnings, so lint blocks on errors only — deliberately, since none of the remaining warnings should stop a push.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { readFileSync } from "fs";
|
||||
import { resolve } from "path";
|
||||
import type { NextRequest } from "next/server";
|
||||
import { queryRaw } from "../../lib/db";
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -13,13 +14,22 @@ const dir = resolve(__dirname, "../fixtures/orders/real");
|
||||
const html = (f: string) => readFileSync(resolve(dir, `${f}.html`), "utf-8");
|
||||
|
||||
const TOKEN = "test-ingest-token";
|
||||
let POST: any;
|
||||
|
||||
// The handler is imported dynamically (after the env var is set), so its type
|
||||
// is declared here rather than inferred. `unknown` for the request is
|
||||
// deliberate: these fixtures are the two properties the route actually reads,
|
||||
// not a whole NextRequest, and widening to `any` would stop the compiler
|
||||
// checking the call sites too.
|
||||
let POST: (req: NextRequest) => Promise<Response>;
|
||||
|
||||
// One cast, at the boundary, instead of `any` everywhere downstream: the
|
||||
// fixture is the two properties the route actually reads, and everything past
|
||||
// this line stays type-checked.
|
||||
const req = (body: unknown, token: string | null = TOKEN) =>
|
||||
({
|
||||
headers: { get: (h: string) => (h === "x-ingest-token" ? token : null) },
|
||||
json: async () => body,
|
||||
}) as any;
|
||||
}) as unknown as NextRequest;
|
||||
|
||||
beforeAll(async () => {
|
||||
process.env.ORDER_INGEST_TOKEN = TOKEN;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, beforeEach, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import type { NextRequest } from "next/server";
|
||||
import { createPool, mockDbWithPool, resetDB } from "./helpers";
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -12,15 +13,41 @@ import { createPool, mockDbWithPool, resetDB } from "./helpers";
|
||||
const pool = createPool();
|
||||
mockDbWithPool(pool);
|
||||
|
||||
let GET: any;
|
||||
let PUT: any;
|
||||
/** What the review route returns, to the extent these tests read it. */
|
||||
type ItemVerdict = { item: string; verdict: string };
|
||||
type Review = {
|
||||
participant_id: number;
|
||||
rating: string | null;
|
||||
note: string | null;
|
||||
order_again: boolean | null;
|
||||
item_verdicts: ItemVerdict[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
type ReviewBody = {
|
||||
reviews: Review[];
|
||||
splits: { participant_id: number; share_percent: number }[];
|
||||
merchant: {
|
||||
warn: boolean;
|
||||
note: string | null;
|
||||
counts: Record<string, number>;
|
||||
history: { transaction_id: number }[];
|
||||
items: { item: string; loved: number; never: number }[];
|
||||
} | null;
|
||||
};
|
||||
type Ctx = { params: Promise<{ id: string }> };
|
||||
|
||||
// Declared rather than inferred because the route is imported dynamically,
|
||||
// after vi.doMock. `unknown` for the request keeps the fixture honest — it is
|
||||
// the two properties the handler reads, not a NextRequest.
|
||||
let GET: (req: NextRequest, ctx: Ctx) => Promise<Response>;
|
||||
let PUT: (req: NextRequest, ctx: Ctx) => Promise<Response>;
|
||||
let ownerId: number;
|
||||
let otherId: number;
|
||||
let txnId: number;
|
||||
|
||||
const req = (body?: unknown) =>
|
||||
({ headers: { get: () => null }, json: async () => body }) as any;
|
||||
const params = (id: number) => ({ params: Promise.resolve({ id: String(id) }) });
|
||||
({ headers: { get: () => null }, json: async () => body }) as unknown as NextRequest;
|
||||
const params = (id: number): Ctx => ({ params: Promise.resolve({ id: String(id) }) });
|
||||
const bodyOf = async (res: Response): Promise<ReviewBody> => (await res.json()) as ReviewBody;
|
||||
|
||||
beforeAll(async () => {
|
||||
vi.doMock("@/lib/auth", () => ({
|
||||
@@ -59,25 +86,25 @@ describe("order verdicts — one per person", () => {
|
||||
it("keeps both people's verdicts on the same order", async () => {
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "loved" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const res = await PUT(req({ participant_id: otherId, rating: "never" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
|
||||
// The bug this guards: a UNIQUE on transaction_id alone made the second
|
||||
// save overwrite the first, and the disagreement is the useful part.
|
||||
expect(body.reviews).toHaveLength(2);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews.find((r: any) => r.participant_id === ownerId).rating).toBe("loved");
|
||||
expect(body.reviews.find((r: any) => r.participant_id === otherId).rating).toBe("never");
|
||||
expect(body.reviews.find((r) => r.participant_id === ownerId)?.rating).toBe("loved");
|
||||
expect(body.reviews.find((r) => r.participant_id === otherId)?.rating).toBe("never");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("defaults the verdict to the signed-in user, not the owner", async () => {
|
||||
const res = await PUT(req({ rating: "ok" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].participant_id).toBe(ownerId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("revising a verdict updates rather than duplicating", async () => {
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "loved" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const res = await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "never" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].rating).toBe("never");
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -88,12 +115,12 @@ describe("order verdicts — one per person", () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("derives order_again from the rating", async () => {
|
||||
let body = await (await PUT(req({ rating: "never" }), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
let body = await bodyOf(await PUT(req({ rating: "never" }), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].order_again).toBe(false);
|
||||
body = await (await PUT(req({ rating: "ok" }), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
body = await bodyOf(await PUT(req({ rating: "ok" }), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].order_again).toBe(true);
|
||||
// "bad" is also a no — you would not choose it again.
|
||||
body = await (await PUT(req({ rating: "bad" }), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
body = await bodyOf(await PUT(req({ rating: "bad" }), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].order_again).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -104,13 +131,13 @@ describe("order verdicts — one per person", () => {
|
||||
const older = await seedOrder("Thai Palace", "2026-06-01");
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "bad" }), params(older));
|
||||
|
||||
let body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.counts.bad).toBe(1);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.warn).toBe(false);
|
||||
let body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.counts.bad).toBe(1);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.warn).toBe(false);
|
||||
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "never" }), params(older));
|
||||
body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +152,7 @@ describe("item verdicts", () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
// No item_verdicts key at all — the shape a note-only form sends.
|
||||
const res = await PUT(req({ rating: "liked", note: "slow delivery" }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].item_verdicts).toEqual([
|
||||
{ item: "Pad Thai", verdict: "loved" },
|
||||
]);
|
||||
@@ -138,7 +165,7 @@ describe("item verdicts", () => {
|
||||
params(txnId)
|
||||
);
|
||||
const res = await PUT(req({ rating: "liked", item_verdicts: [] }), params(txnId));
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].item_verdicts).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -154,7 +181,7 @@ describe("item verdicts", () => {
|
||||
}),
|
||||
params(txnId)
|
||||
);
|
||||
const body = await res.json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(res);
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].rating).toBe("ok");
|
||||
expect(body.reviews[0].item_verdicts).toEqual([
|
||||
{ item: "Pad Thai", verdict: "loved" },
|
||||
@@ -167,10 +194,10 @@ describe("merchant history", () => {
|
||||
const older = await seedOrder("Thai Palace", "2026-06-01");
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "never", note: "cold" }), params(older));
|
||||
|
||||
const body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.counts.never).toBe(1);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.history.map((h: any) => h.transaction_id)).toEqual([older]);
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.counts.never).toBe(1);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.history.map((h) => h.transaction_id)).toEqual([older]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("treats the same restaurant as one merchant across platforms", async () => {
|
||||
@@ -181,17 +208,17 @@ describe("merchant history", () => {
|
||||
const shouty = await seedOrder("THAI PALACE", "2026-06-01");
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "never" }), params(shouty));
|
||||
|
||||
const body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.history.map((h: any) => h.transaction_id)).toContain(shouty);
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.warn).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.history.map((h) => h.transaction_id)).toContain(shouty);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not carry a verdict across different merchants", async () => {
|
||||
const other = await seedOrder("Pizza Place", "2026-06-01");
|
||||
await PUT(req({ participant_id: ownerId, rating: "never" }), params(other));
|
||||
|
||||
const body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.warn).toBe(false);
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.warn).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("pools item opinions across the merchant's orders", async () => {
|
||||
@@ -206,10 +233,10 @@ describe("merchant history", () => {
|
||||
params(older2)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
// Case-folded: the same dish comes back capitalised differently between
|
||||
// receipts, and two entries for one dish is not a track record.
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.items).toEqual([{ item: "Pad Thai", loved: 2, never: 0 }]);
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.items).toEqual([{ item: "Pad Thai", loved: 2, never: 0 }]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("keeps item opinions from reviews that have no overall rating", async () => {
|
||||
@@ -218,14 +245,14 @@ describe("merchant history", () => {
|
||||
req({ item_verdicts: [{ item: "Satay", verdict: "never" }] }),
|
||||
params(older)
|
||||
);
|
||||
const body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
expect(body.merchant.items).toEqual([{ item: "Satay", loved: 0, never: 1 }]);
|
||||
const body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.merchant!.items).toEqual([{ item: "Satay", loved: 0, never: 1 }]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("share state", () => {
|
||||
it("reports splits so the panel can show shared vs just me", async () => {
|
||||
let body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
let body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.splits).toEqual([]);
|
||||
|
||||
await pool.query(
|
||||
@@ -233,7 +260,7 @@ describe("share state", () => {
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, 50)`,
|
||||
[txnId, otherId]
|
||||
);
|
||||
body = await (await GET(req(), params(txnId))).json();
|
||||
body = await bodyOf(await GET(req(), params(txnId)));
|
||||
expect(body.splits).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(body.splits[0].participant_id).toBe(otherId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user