feat(orders): make an ingested order legible in the transactions view

Four things the view could not tell you, all from reading the rows (user,
2026-07-27).

**Which platform.** The parser has always known — it has to, to read the
template — and then discarded it. "Order - Burger Corner" gives no way to know
whether to open DoorDash or Uber Eats for the detail, and restaurants exist on
both. Now stored on expense_metadata and named in the description:
"Order - Burger Corner (Uber Eats)". Migration 0021 recovers it for the 101
backfilled rows from the order_reference shape — DoorDash receipts carry no id
of their own so ingestion synthesises `msg:<message-id>`, Uber carries a real
trip UUID, which makes the discriminator exact.

**Bank said "Manual".** That label is derived, not stored, and "Manual" reads
as "hand-entered, still awaiting a card line to match". A gift-card order has
no card line coming, ever. It now reads "Gift Card", and — the part that
actually mattered — credits joins cash in needsCardMatch(), so these stop
sitting in the pending-reconciliation queue. All 81 were queued against a match
that could not exist.

**Uber line items were never parsed.** 67 of 101 orders had none. Uber itemises
groceries but not restaurant orders, so some of that is genuine; the rest was
simply unread. Its markup is better than DoorDash's — every cell carries a
data-testid with the item's uuid, so qty/title/amount bind by id rather than by
column position. Sold-out items (0.00) are kept: they are why a total is lower
than what was ordered.

**Uber prints pick-up and delivery addresses on every receipt** and they were
thrown away. Captured as `route` [{label, time, address}], de-duplicated
because the template renders the whole block twice for narrow screens. Wording
is kept as printed ("Pick-up" on some receipts, "Pickup" on others) rather than
normalised, so a template change stays visible. This is the same block a *trip*
receipt uses for start and destination — rides are not ingested today, but the
reader will not need changing when they are.

Also stores source_email_subject/from, which order ingestion had left null on
columns that already existed.

Verified against the captured corpus: route on all 6 Uber fixtures, 5/5 items
on the GLOMARK grocery receipt including the sold-out one. Production data
updated by smarthome:docker/scripts/order-presentation-2026-07-27.sql
(81 descriptions, `backfill` tag, re-run clean). `route` and Uber line items
are parsed from here on only — recovering them for already-ingested orders
means re-reading the mail, which I7 idempotency refuses by design.

prisma/migrations/0021_order_platform_provenance/migration.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+-- Order provenance: which platform the receipt came from, and the message it
+-- came from.
+--
+-- The parser has always known the platform (it has to, to read the template)
+-- and then threw it away. Without it a transaction reads "Order - Burger
+-- Corner" with no way to tell whether to look in DoorDash or Uber Eats for the
+-- detail, and no way to answer "how much of this is DoorDash?" at all.
+--
+-- `source_email_subject` / `source_email_from` already existed for the
+-- Paperless expense path and were simply never populated by order ingestion.
+
+ALTER TABLE expense_metadata ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS platform text;
+
+COMMENT ON COLUMN expense_metadata.platform IS
+  'doordash | ubereats | uber — the receipt template the order was read from.';
+
+-- Backfill the 101 rows written by the 2026-07-27 backfill. DoorDash receipts
+-- carry no order id of their own, so ingestion synthesises `msg:<message-id>`;
+-- Uber receipts carry a real trip UUID. That is the only surviving
+-- discriminator, and it is exact.
+UPDATE expense_metadata
+   SET platform = CASE WHEN order_reference LIKE 'msg:%' THEN 'doordash' ELSE 'ubereats' END
+ WHERE platform IS NULL
+   AND source = 'email'
+   AND paperless_doc_id IS NULL   -- exclude the Paperless expense path
+   AND order_reference IS NOT NULL;
+
+-- Pick-up / delivery stops, as the receipt prints them. Uber puts these on
+-- every order under `Order details`; DoorDash prints no addresses at all, so
+-- this stays '[]' there. Same block a *trip* receipt uses for start and
+-- destination, so this column already fits rides when they come into scope.
+ALTER TABLE expense_metadata ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS route jsonb NOT NULL DEFAULT '[]'::jsonb;
+
+COMMENT ON COLUMN expense_metadata.route IS
+  'Uber only: [{label, time, address}] — pick-up and delivery stops as printed.';
+
+CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_expense_metadata_platform
+    ON expense_metadata (platform)
+ WHERE platform IS NOT NULL;

src/__tests__/integration/order-ingestion.test.ts

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import {
   type MessageMeta,
 } from "../../lib/order-ingestion";
 import { EXCLUDE_NON_SPEND } from "../../lib/analytics-sql";
+import { bankLabel, needsCardMatch } from "../../lib/queries";
 
 /**
  * These run against REAL captured receipts, not synthetic fixtures. The earlier
@@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ describe("Order ingestion — invariants", () => {
     expect(b.skipped).toBe("already_ingested");
     expect(b.metadataId).toBe(a.metadataId);
     const n = await queryRow<{ c: string }>(
-      `SELECT count(*)::text c FROM transactions WHERE description = 'Order - Mad Mex'`
+      `SELECT count(*)::text c FROM transactions WHERE description = 'Order - Mad Mex (DoorDash)'`
     );
     expect(Number(n!.c)).toBe(1);
   });
@@ -379,3 +380,60 @@ describe("owner scoping", () => {
     expect(visible).toHaveLength(1);
   });
 });
+
+describe("how an ingested order presents in the app", () => {
+  it("names the platform in the description", async () => {
+    // "Order - Burger Corner" gives no way to know where to look for the
+    // detail, and the same restaurant can be on both platforms.
+    const p = parseOrderHTML(html("dd-01"), meta({ messageId: `desc-${Date.now()}` }));
+    const res = await processOrderIngestion(p);
+    const row = await queryRow<{ description: string }>(
+      `SELECT description FROM transactions WHERE id = $1`, [res.transactionId]
+    );
+    expect(row!.description).toMatch(/\(DoorDash\)$/);
+  });
+
+  it("reads as 'Gift Card', not 'Manual', and stays out of the reconcile queue", async () => {
+    // bank_name is derived — no statement means "Manual", which reads as
+    // "hand-entered, awaiting a card line". A credits order has no card line
+    // coming, ever; 81 of them sat in the queue waiting for one.
+    const p = parseOrderHTML(html("dd-01"), meta({ messageId: `bank-${Date.now()}` }));
+    const res = await processOrderIngestion(p);
+
+    const row = await queryRow<{ bank_name: string }>(
+      `SELECT ${bankLabel()} as bank_name
+         FROM transactions t LEFT JOIN statements s ON s.id = t.statement_id
+        WHERE t.id = $1`,
+      [res.transactionId]
+    );
+    expect(row!.bank_name).toBe("Gift Card");
+
+    const queued = await queryRaw(
+      `SELECT t.id FROM transactions t
+        WHERE t.id = $1 AND t.statement_id IS NULL AND ${needsCardMatch("t")}`,
+      [res.transactionId]
+    );
+    expect(queued).toHaveLength(0);
+  });
+
+  it("records the platform and the message it came from", async () => {
+    const p = parseOrderHTML(
+      html("ue-00"),
+      meta({ messageId: `prov-${Date.now()}`, subject: "Your Wednesday order with Uber Eats", sender: "uber.com" })
+    );
+    const res = await processOrderIngestion(p, {
+      messageId: `prov-${Date.now()}`,
+      subject: "Your Wednesday order with Uber Eats",
+      sender: "uber.com",
+    });
+    const row = await queryRow<{
+      platform: string; source_email_from: string; route: { label: string }[];
+    }>(
+      `SELECT platform, source_email_from, route FROM expense_metadata WHERE id = $1`,
+      [res.metadataId]
+    );
+    expect(row!.platform).toBe("ubereats");
+    expect(row!.source_email_from).toBe("uber.com");
+    expect(row!.route.map((r) => r.label)).toEqual(["Pick-up", "Delivery"]);
+  });
+});

src/__tests__/unit/order-ingestion.test.ts

@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ describe("validateOrderTotals", () => {
       service_fee: null, tip: null, discounts: null, total_charged: 10,
     },
     line_items: [],
+    route: [],
     is_family: false,
     flags: [],
     ...over,
@@ -180,3 +181,69 @@ describe("mixed Uber payment (issuer-named card leg)", () => {
     expect(validateOrderTotals(p).ok).toBe(true);
   });
 });
+
+describe("Uber route (pick-up / delivery)", () => {
+  const uber = (f: string, subject = "Your Wednesday order with Uber Eats") =>
+    parseOrderHTML(html(f), meta({ subject, sender: "uber.com" }));
+
+  it("reads both stops with their times, as printed", () => {
+    const p = uber("ue-00");
+    expect(p.route).toEqual([
+      { label: "Pick-up", time: "1:20 pm", address: "197 Watton St, Werribee VIC 3030, Australia" },
+      { label: "Delivery", time: "1:40 pm", address: "19 Lady Penrhyn Dr, Wyndham Vale VIC 3024, Australia" },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  it("de-duplicates the block Uber renders twice", () => {
+    // The receipt emits the whole address section a second time for narrow
+    // screens. Without de-duplication every trip has four stops.
+    expect(uber("ue-00").route).toHaveLength(2);
+    expect(uber("ue-26").route).toHaveLength(2);
+  });
+
+  it("keeps the receipt's own wording rather than normalising it", () => {
+    // Uber is not internally consistent: "Pick-up" on some receipts,
+    // "Pickup" on others. Inventing a canonical spelling would hide that a
+    // template changed.
+    expect(uber("ue-mixed", "Your Friday morning order with Uber Eats").route[0].label).toBe("Pickup");
+  });
+
+  it("works on an international receipt", () => {
+    const p = uber("ue-26");
+    expect(p.route[1].address).toContain("Luzern, Switzerland");
+  });
+
+  it("DoorDash has no route — its receipts carry no addresses", () => {
+    expect(parseOrderHTML(html("dd-01"), meta()).route).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("Uber line items", () => {
+  it("itemises a grocery order, binding qty/title/amount by item id", () => {
+    const p = parseOrderHTML(
+      html("ue-09"),
+      meta({ subject: "Your Sunday evening order with Uber Eats", sender: "uber.com" })
+    );
+    expect(p.line_items).toHaveLength(5);
+    expect(p.line_items[0]).toMatchObject({
+      qty: 1,
+      description: "Highland Brewing MILK FULL CREAM U H T 900ML",
+      amount: 440,
+    });
+    // A sold-out item prints 0.00 and is kept: it is why the total is lower
+    // than what was ordered, and dropping it makes the receipt unexplainable.
+    expect(p.line_items.map((i) => i.amount)).toContain(0);
+  });
+
+  it("a restaurant order legitimately has none", () => {
+    // Uber itemises groceries only; a restaurant receipt states a total and
+    // nothing else. Empty here is the receipt, not a parse failure — so it
+    // must not raise no_line_items_parsed either.
+    const p = parseOrderHTML(
+      html("ue-00"),
+      meta({ subject: "Your Wednesday order with Uber Eats", sender: "uber.com" })
+    );
+    expect(p.line_items).toEqual([]);
+    expect(p.flags).not.toContain("no_line_items_parsed");
+  });
+});

src/app/api/orders/ingest/route.ts

@@ -72,7 +72,11 @@ export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
 
     if (dryRun) return NextResponse.json({ kind: "order", order });
 
-    const result = await processOrderIngestion(order, { messageId: meta.messageId });
+    const result = await processOrderIngestion(order, {
+      messageId: meta.messageId,
+      subject: meta.subject,
+      sender: meta.sender,
+    });
     return NextResponse.json({
       kind: "order",
       order_reference: order.order_reference,

src/lib/order-ingestion.ts

@@ -12,6 +12,24 @@ export const CUTOVER_DATE = "2026-01-09";
  */
 export const DEFAULT_OWNER_ID = 1;
 
+/** Human labels for the platform a receipt came from. */
+export const PLATFORM_LABEL: Record<ParsedOrder["platform"], string> = {
+  doordash: "DoorDash",
+  ubereats: "Uber Eats",
+  uber: "Uber",
+};
+
+/**
+ * Transaction description.
+ *
+ * The merchant alone ("Order - Burger Corner") does not say where to go and
+ * look for the detail, and there are restaurants on both platforms. The
+ * platform is the one thing the parser always knows and used to discard.
+ */
+export function orderDescription(platform: ParsedOrder["platform"], merchant: string): string {
+  return `Order - ${merchant} (${PLATFORM_LABEL[platform]})`;
+}
+
 export interface IngestResult {
   transactionId: number | null;
   metadataId: number | null;
@@ -93,7 +111,13 @@ async function ensureTag(name: string): Promise<number> {
  */
 export async function processOrderIngestion(
   order: ParsedOrder,
-  options: { messageId?: string; backfillMode?: boolean; ownerId?: number } = {}
+  options: {
+    messageId?: string;
+    backfillMode?: boolean;
+    ownerId?: number;
+    subject?: string;
+    sender?: string;
+  } = {}
 ): Promise<IngestResult> {
   const flags = [...order.flags];
   const day = order.order_datetime.slice(0, 10);
@@ -159,7 +183,7 @@ export async function processOrderIngestion(
        RETURNING id`,
       [
         day,
-        `Order - ${order.merchant_name}`,
+        orderDescription(order.platform, order.merchant_name),
         creditsAmount,
         // No FX rate is available at ingest, so amount_aud is left NULL for
         // foreign orders rather than asserting a conversion we cannot make.
@@ -194,8 +218,9 @@ export async function processOrderIngestion(
     `INSERT INTO expense_metadata (
        transaction_id, source, source_message_id, order_reference, line_items,
        subtotal, amount, merchant_normalized, transaction_date,
-       card_last4, currency, flags, reconciled_at
+       card_last4, currency, flags, reconciled_at,
-     ) VALUES ($1,'email',$2,$3,$4::jsonb,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10,$11::jsonb,$12)
+       platform, source_email_subject, source_email_from, route
+     ) VALUES ($1,'email',$2,$3,$4::jsonb,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10,$11::jsonb,$12,$13,$14,$15,$16::jsonb)
      RETURNING id`,
     [
       transactionId,
@@ -210,6 +235,10 @@ export async function processOrderIngestion(
       order.currency,
       JSON.stringify(flags),
       pending ? null : new Date().toISOString(),
+      order.platform,
+      options.subject ?? null,
+      options.sender ?? null,
+      JSON.stringify(order.route ?? []),
     ]
   );
 
@@ -239,9 +268,10 @@ export async function reconcilePendingOrders(): Promise<{
     merchant_normalized: string;
     card_last4: string | null;
     currency: string | null;
+    platform: ParsedOrder["platform"] | null;
   }>(
     `SELECT id, order_reference, amount::text, transaction_date::text,
-            merchant_normalized, card_last4, currency
+            merchant_normalized, card_last4, currency, platform
        FROM expense_metadata
       WHERE transaction_id IS NULL
         AND reconciled_at IS NULL
@@ -255,7 +285,7 @@ export async function reconcilePendingOrders(): Promise<{
     const total = Number(row.amount);
     const probe: ParsedOrder = {
       order_reference: row.order_reference,
-      platform: "doordash",
+      platform: row.platform ?? "doordash",
       merchant_name: row.merchant_normalized,
       order_datetime: `${row.transaction_date}T00:00:00Z`,
       currency: row.currency || "AUD",
@@ -265,6 +295,7 @@ export async function reconcilePendingOrders(): Promise<{
         service_fee: null, tip: null, discounts: null, total_charged: total,
       },
       line_items: [],
+      route: [],
       is_family: false,
       flags: [],
     };
@@ -291,7 +322,7 @@ export async function reconcilePendingOrders(): Promise<{
            payment_method, merchant_name, merchant_normalized, transaction_type, owner_id
          ) VALUES ($1,$2,$3,$3,$5,'credits',$4,$4,'debit',$6)
          RETURNING id`,
-        [row.transaction_date, `Order - ${row.merchant_normalized}`, remainder, row.merchant_normalized, category, DEFAULT_OWNER_ID]
+        [row.transaction_date, orderDescription(row.platform ?? "doordash", row.merchant_normalized), remainder, row.merchant_normalized, category, DEFAULT_OWNER_ID]
       );
       txnId = txn!.id;
       created++;

src/lib/order-parse.ts

@@ -20,6 +20,18 @@ export interface LineItem {
   options?: string[];
 }
 
+/**
+ * A stop on the receipt's map: pick-up, delivery, or (for a trip) the ride's
+ * start and end. Uber prints these for every order under `Order details`.
+ */
+export interface RoutePoint {
+  /** "Pick-up" / "Delivery" — whatever the receipt itself calls it. */
+  label: string;
+  /** Local time as printed, e.g. "1:20 pm". No date; the receipt gives none. */
+  time: string | null;
+  address: string;
+}
+
 export interface PaymentBreakdown {
   credits_amount: number | null;
   card_amount: number | null;
@@ -47,6 +59,8 @@ export interface ParsedOrder {
   payment: PaymentBreakdown;
   totals: OrderTotals;
   line_items: LineItem[];
+  /** Uber only. Empty for DoorDash, whose receipts carry no addresses. */
+  route: RoutePoint[];
   is_family: boolean;
   flags: string[];
 }
@@ -116,6 +130,81 @@ function tdPairValue(html: string, label: string): number | null {
   return m ? money(m[1]) : null;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Uber itemises only *grocery* orders — a restaurant receipt states a total and
+ * nothing else, which is why 67 of the 101 backfilled orders have no items.
+ * When it does itemise, the markup is far better than DoorDash's: every cell
+ * carries a `data-testid` naming its role and the item's own uuid, so quantity,
+ * title and amount can be bound to each other by id rather than by position.
+ */
+function parseUberLineItems(html: string): LineItem[] {
+  const items: LineItem[] = [];
+  const titleRe =
+    /data-testid="shoppingCart_item_title_([0-9a-f-]+)"[^>]*>([\s\S]*?)<\/td>/gi;
+
+  for (const m of html.matchAll(titleRe)) {
+    const [, id, rawTitle] = m;
+    const description = collapse(decodeEntities(stripTags(rawTitle)));
+    if (!description) continue;
+
+    const qtyM = html.match(
+      new RegExp(`data-testid="shoppingCart_item_quantity_${id}"[^>]*>\\s*(\\d+)\\s*<`, "i")
+    );
+    const amtM = html.match(
+      new RegExp(
+        `data-testid="shoppingCart_item_amount_${id}"[^>]*>([\\s\\S]*?)<\\/td>`,
+        "i"
+      )
+    );
+    const amtText = amtM ? collapse(decodeEntities(stripTags(amtM[1]))) : "";
+    const amtNum = amtText.match(/(-?[\d,]+\.\d{2})/);
+
+    items.push({
+      qty: qtyM ? parseInt(qtyM[1], 10) : 1,
+      description,
+      // A sold-out item prints 0.00 and is genuinely part of the order — it
+      // explains a total that does not match what was asked for. Keep it.
+      amount: amtNum ? money(amtNum[1]) : 0,
+    });
+  }
+  return items;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Uber's `Order details` block, anchored on `data-testid="address_point_N_*"`.
+ *
+ * The template repeats the whole block twice (once hidden for narrow screens),
+ * so the same stop appears more than once and has to be de-duplicated. This is
+ * the same markup a *trip* receipt uses for its start and destination — rides
+ * are not ingested today, but the reader will not need changing when they are.
+ */
+function parseUberRoute(html: string): RoutePoint[] {
+  const seen = new Set<string>();
+  const points: RoutePoint[] = [];
+
+  const labelRe = /data-testid="address_point_(\d+)_time"[^>]*>([\s\S]*?)<\/td>/gi;
+  for (const m of html.matchAll(labelRe)) {
+    const [, idx, rawLabel] = m;
+    const addrM = html.match(
+      new RegExp(`data-testid="address_point_${idx}_address"[^>]*>([\\s\\S]*?)<\\/td>`, "i")
+    );
+    if (!addrM) continue;
+
+    const address = collapse(decodeEntities(stripTags(addrM[1])));
+    // "1:20 pm - Pick-up" — time and label share one cell.
+    const combined = collapse(decodeEntities(stripTags(rawLabel)));
+    const split = combined.match(/^(.*?)\s+-\s+(.*)$/);
+    const time = split ? split[1] : null;
+    const label = split ? split[2] : combined;
+
+    const key = `${label}|${time}|${address}`;
+    if (!address || seen.has(key)) continue;
+    seen.add(key);
+    points.push({ label, time, address });
+  }
+  return points;
+}
+
 function parseDoorDashLineItems(html: string): LineItem[] {
   // <td width="10%">1x</td><td width="75%"><b>Name</b> (Cat)<br><font>• Opt</font>…</td><td width="15%">$22.10</td>
   const re =
@@ -397,11 +486,15 @@ export function parseOrderHTML(html: string, meta: MessageMeta): ParsedOrder {
   // ---- line items ----------------------------------------------------------
   // Uber Eats receipts carry no itemisation (verified across 29 real mails).
   const line_items =
-    platform === "doordash" ? parseDoorDashLineItems(clean) : [];
+    platform === "doordash" ? parseDoorDashLineItems(clean) : parseUberLineItems(clean);
   if (platform === "doordash" && line_items.length === 0) {
     flags.push("no_line_items_parsed");
   }
 
+  // Uber prints addresses on every receipt; DoorDash prints none at all, so an
+  // empty route there is expected rather than a parse failure.
+  const route = platform === "doordash" ? [] : parseUberRoute(clean);
+
   const currency =
     explicitCurrency ||
     (/\b(NZD|USD|LKR|CHF|EUR|GBP|SGD|INR)\b/.test(text)
@@ -417,6 +510,7 @@ export function parseOrderHTML(html: string, meta: MessageMeta): ParsedOrder {
     payment,
     totals,
     line_items,
+    route,
     is_family,
     flags,
   };

src/lib/queries.ts

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ export interface TransactionRow {
   principal_amount: number | null;
   interest_amount: number | null;
   // How it was paid (migration 0016). NULL = unknown, treated as reconcilable.
-  // 'cash' is excluded from reconciliation — see notCash().
+  // 'cash' and 'credits' are excluded from reconciliation — see needsCardMatch().
   payment_method: string | null;
   // override fields
   category_override: string | null;
@@ -133,17 +133,24 @@ export async function getTransactions(ownerId: number, filters: TransactionFilte
     params.push(filters.categories);
   }
   if (filters.bank_names?.length) {
+    // "Manual" and "Gift Card" are not banks — they are the two shapes a
+    // statement-less row can take, and bankLabel() decides which. The filter
+    // has to split on the same condition or the chip selects nothing.
     const hasManual = filters.bank_names.includes("Manual");
-    const bankList = filters.bank_names.filter((b) => b !== "Manual");
+    const hasGiftCard = filters.bank_names.includes("Gift Card");
-    if (hasManual && bankList.length > 0) {
+    const bankList = filters.bank_names.filter((b) => b !== "Manual" && b !== "Gift Card");
-      conditions.push(`(t.statement_id IS NULL OR s.bank_name = ANY($${paramIdx++}::text[]))`);
+    const alternatives: string[] = [];
-      params.push(bankList);
+    if (hasManual) {
-    } else if (hasManual) {
+      alternatives.push(`(t.statement_id IS NULL AND t.payment_method IS DISTINCT FROM 'credits')`);
-      conditions.push(`t.statement_id IS NULL`);
+    }
-    } else {
+    if (hasGiftCard) {
-      conditions.push(`s.bank_name = ANY($${paramIdx++}::text[])`);
+      alternatives.push(`(t.statement_id IS NULL AND t.payment_method = 'credits')`);
+    }
+    if (bankList.length > 0) {
+      alternatives.push(`s.bank_name = ANY($${paramIdx++}::text[])`);
       params.push(bankList);
     }
+    conditions.push(`(${alternatives.join(" OR ")})`);
   }
   if (filters.tag_ids?.length) {
     const noTags = filters.tag_ids.includes("untagged");
@@ -210,7 +217,7 @@ export async function getTransactions(ownerId: number, filters: TransactionFilte
       o.category_override, o.merchant_normalized as merchant_override, o.notes, o.my_share_percent,
       COALESCE(o.category_override, t.category) as effective_category,
       COALESCE(o.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_name) as effective_merchant,
-      COALESCE(s.bank_name, 'Manual') as bank_name,
+      ${bankLabel()} as bank_name,
       COALESCE(s.currency, 'AUD') as currency,
       -- My share, resolved the same way analytics does it (see myShare in
       -- analytics-sql.ts): explicit split row, then override, then whatever is
@@ -294,7 +301,7 @@ export async function getTransactionById(id: number) {
       o.category_override, o.merchant_normalized as merchant_override, o.notes, o.my_share_percent,
       COALESCE(o.category_override, t.category) as effective_category,
       COALESCE(o.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_name) as effective_merchant,
-      COALESCE(s.bank_name, 'Manual') as bank_name,
+      ${bankLabel()} as bank_name,
       COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id) as owner_id,
       p.name as owner_name
     FROM transactions t
@@ -376,12 +383,20 @@ export async function getMerchantSuggestions(search: string) {
 }
 
 export async function getBankNames() {
-  const [bankRows, manualCount] = await Promise.all([
+  const [bankRows, statementless] = await Promise.all([
     queryRaw<{ bank_name: string }>(`SELECT DISTINCT bank_name FROM statements ORDER BY bank_name`),
-    queryRaw<{ count: number }>(`SELECT COUNT(*)::int as count FROM transactions WHERE statement_id IS NULL`),
+    queryRaw<{ label: string }>(
+      `SELECT DISTINCT ${bankLabel("t", "s")} as label
+         FROM transactions t LEFT JOIN statements s ON s.id = t.statement_id
+        WHERE t.statement_id IS NULL`
+    ),
   ]);
   const banks = bankRows.map((r) => r.bank_name);
-  if (manualCount[0]?.count > 0) banks.push("Manual");
+  // Order matters for the filter chips: real banks first, then the
+  // statement-less kinds, in a stable order rather than whatever the DB returns.
+  for (const label of ["Manual", "Gift Card"]) {
+    if (statementless.some((r) => r.label === label)) banks.push(label);
+  }
   return banks;
 }
 
@@ -533,8 +548,25 @@ export async function batchInsertCSVTransactions(
  * transaction accounts are imported, and NULL means unknown — both stay
  * candidates, which preserves the behaviour of every pre-existing row.
  */
-export const notCash = (alias = "t") =>
+/**
-  `(${alias}.payment_method IS NULL OR ${alias}.payment_method <> 'cash')`;
+ * Payment methods that can still be matched against a card statement line.
+ *
+ * Cash never appears on one. Neither does a credits-funded delivery order: the
+ * gift card already paid it, so there is no card leg coming, ever. Leaving
+ * those in the queue meant 81 orders sat in "pending reconciliation" waiting
+ * for a match that could not exist (user, 2026-07-27).
+ */
+export const needsCardMatch = (alias = "t") =>
+  `(${alias}.payment_method IS NULL OR ${alias}.payment_method NOT IN ('cash', 'credits'))`;
+
+/**
+ * Bank label for a transaction. A row with no statement was not imported from
+ * one, and the label has to say *why*: "Manual" reads as "hand-entered, still
+ * awaiting a card line", which is wrong for a gift-card order — nothing is
+ * awaited. `s` must be the statements alias in scope.
+ */
+export const bankLabel = (t = "t", s = "s") =>
+  `COALESCE(${s}.bank_name, CASE WHEN ${t}.payment_method = 'credits' THEN 'Gift Card' ELSE 'Manual' END)`;
 
 export interface PotentialMatch {
   id: number;
@@ -578,7 +610,7 @@ export async function getPendingReconciliations(ownerId: number): Promise<Manual
        WHERE ts.transaction_id = t.id
      ) txn_splits ON true
      WHERE t.statement_id IS NULL AND t.owner_id = $1 AND t.reconciled_with_id IS NULL
-       AND ${notCash("t")}
+       AND ${needsCardMatch("t")}
      ORDER BY t.transaction_date DESC, t.row_index ASC`,
     [ownerId]
   );
@@ -620,7 +652,7 @@ export async function getPendingReconciliations(ownerId: number): Promise<Manual
        WHERE m.statement_id IS NULL
          AND m.owner_id = $1
          AND m.reconciled_with_id IS NULL
-         AND ${notCash("m")}
+         AND ${needsCardMatch("m")}
          AND COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id) = $1
          AND NOT EXISTS (
            SELECT 1 FROM transactions mt WHERE mt.reconciled_with_id = t.id
@@ -687,7 +719,7 @@ export async function getSharedTransactions(ownerId: number, tagIds?: number[],
       o.category_override, o.merchant_normalized as merchant_override, o.notes,
       COALESCE(o.category_override, t.category) as effective_category,
       COALESCE(o.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_normalized, t.merchant_name) as effective_merchant,
-      COALESCE(s.bank_name, 'Manual') as bank_name,
+      ${bankLabel()} as bank_name,
       COALESCE(t.owner_id, s.owner_id) as owner_id,
       p_owner.name as owner_name,
       COALESCE(src.created_at, t.created_at) as created_at,