Sign the investments line so withdrawals net against contributions
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 50s
ci / lint-test (push) Successful in 50s
A withdrawal from a fund is a disinvestment, not income: units convert back to cash and net worth is unchanged. Summed unsigned it read as more money invested. March 2026 showed $38,615.34 of investing in a month that was net -$11,384.66, because a $25,000 Raiz withdrawal was added to an $8,563.80 IBKR deposit instead of cancelling it. Each credit costs twice — once for being added, once for not being subtracted — so the error is double the credit: $50,000 in March, $3,000 in May 2025, $53,000 across the window. Since net = income - spent - investments, March's net of -$55,918.73 should read -$5,918.73. Filing withdrawals as income is the other tempting answer and is worse: it books an asset disposal as earnings and feeds the same figure into net with a flattering sign. Same reason the Up item sales in Known Gaps do not belong on the income line. What this cannot resolve: part of a withdrawal genuinely is income — the capital gain. The bank descriptor is one gross figure with no cost base, so it cannot be decomposed from statement data. Netting tracks cash committed against cash returned and leaves the gain for holdings data to surface; it does not assert the gain is zero. The budget page gates the Invested card on `!== 0` rather than `> 0` — a net-disinvesting month is real data, not an empty one — and renders negative months in amber so the sign is not hidden by matching digits.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -529,6 +529,33 @@ Loan interest uses the `loan_interest` category; principal repayments use
|
||||
`investment` (excluded from spend, surfaced on the investments line in monthly
|
||||
analytics).
|
||||
|
||||
### The investments line is signed
|
||||
|
||||
A withdrawal from a fund is a **disinvestment**, not income. Units convert back
|
||||
to cash; net worth is unchanged. `INVESTMENT_SIGNED` (`analytics-sql.ts`) makes
|
||||
credits and refunds negative so they net against contributions, and
|
||||
`/api/analytics/monthly` is the only consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
Summed unsigned, a withdrawal read as *more* money invested: March 2026 showed
|
||||
$38,615.34 of investing in a month that was net **−$11,384.66**, because a
|
||||
$25,000 Raiz withdrawal was added to an $8,563.80 IBKR deposit instead of
|
||||
cancelling it. **Each credit costs twice** — once for being added, once for not
|
||||
being subtracted — so the error is double the credit, $50,000 in that month.
|
||||
|
||||
Filing withdrawals as `income` is the other tempting answer and is worse: it
|
||||
books an asset disposal as earnings and feeds `net = income − spent −
|
||||
investments` with a flattering sign. Same reason the Up item sales in Known Gaps
|
||||
do not belong on the income line.
|
||||
|
||||
**What this cannot resolve:** part of a withdrawal genuinely *is* income — the
|
||||
capital gain. The bank descriptor is one gross figure with no cost base
|
||||
(`TRANSFER FROM RAIZ WITHDRAWAL 7D5262D8A839248A12`), so it cannot be decomposed
|
||||
from statement data. Netting tracks cash committed against cash returned and
|
||||
leaves the gain for holdings data to surface; it does not assert the gain is zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Consequence for the UI: a net-disinvesting month is real data, so the budget page
|
||||
gates on `!== 0`, not `> 0`, and renders negatives in amber.
|
||||
|
||||
### Prisma
|
||||
|
||||
The schema at `prisma/schema.prisma` covers all tables. The generated client (gitignored) must be regenerated after schema changes:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user